etaoin Posted June 8, 2020 Posted June 8, 2020 I'm running Affinity Photo on a 27-inch iMac and I find the user interface harder to use than other programs. The gray-on-gray non-color scheme lacks contrast making it hard to see icons, etc. Also, you have plenty of room to make the icons in the various tool bars at least 50 percent larger. Please consider that in your next update. Thanks. Jowday 1 Quote
wonderings Posted June 8, 2020 Posted June 8, 2020 Comparing Photo to Photoshop I do not see much of a difference. Affinity also uses some colour in their tool bars. Not sure which one I prefer, I am leaning towards Photoshop as the grey on darker grey is a bit more preferable for my eyes but that is just a matter of choice. Both seem equally functional from a visual stand point. Quote
Pšenda Posted June 8, 2020 Posted June 8, 2020 As you can see, it can't suit everyone. The only option is to make everything fully configurable so that each user can set everything according to their needs. Quote Affinity Store (MSI/EXE): Affinity Suite (ADe, APh, APu) 2.5.7.2948 (Retail) Dell OptiPlex 7060, i5-8500 3.00 GHz, 16 GB, Intel UHD Graphics 630, Dell P2417H 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 24H2, Build 26100.2605. Dell Latitude E5570, i5-6440HQ 2.60 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics 530, 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 24H2, Build 26100.2605. Intel NUC5PGYH, Pentium N3700 2.40 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics, EIZO EV2456 1920 x 1200, Windows 10 Pro, Version 21H1, Build 19043.2130.
fde101 Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 There is a light color scheme available within Preferences, but I would suggest you try adjusting the "UI Gamma" setting first to see if you can find a better contrast level without going quite that far. Neutral gray as the bulk of the interface is critical for professional applications that deal with image-related manipulation. Having colorful elements in the UI can throw off the user's perception of the colors within the document itself and be the cause of errors in the results. Spaceman Spiff and Wosven 2 Quote
mackleys Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 for me +1 on this. I don't need color UI icons, but better contrast with the icons is needed in dark mode for better recognition of elements. I switch between dark and light UI depending on the ambient light in my work environment and the contrast/color/saturation of the images I am working on. The light UI has good contrast for quick icon scanning; the dark not so much. (as an aside I still kinda recall the discussion about this when you launched v1.6 - https://www.designernews.co/stories/79399-is-a-light-or-dark-ui-better: it really seems to come down to preference and content) Quote
csc14us Posted July 7, 2020 Posted July 7, 2020 I like the Affinity Photo user interface and would not be in favor of an overhaul. Aftemplate, Spaceman Spiff, RNKLN and 2 others 5 Quote
Aftemplate Posted July 7, 2020 Posted July 7, 2020 Check: Preferences > user interface Grayscale is customizable(Gamma) Other issues waiting to be solved are clearly more pressing and difficult than UI. (E.g. missing GPU 10 times acceleration in windows. Missing GPU float high quality "stageless variable speed" rotary canvas) Quote The more restricted you put on the program, the closer you program is to idiot.
csc14us Posted July 7, 2020 Posted July 7, 2020 I want a robust brush manager; that's my #1 item. Frozen Death Knight, KC Honie, RNKLN and 1 other 4 Quote
Aftemplate Posted July 7, 2020 Posted July 7, 2020 7 minutes ago, csc14us said: I want a robust brush manager; that's my #1 item. I vote for you. The current brush manager is not satisfactory. Quote The more restricted you put on the program, the closer you program is to idiot.
Vulcan Posted September 25, 2020 Posted September 25, 2020 On 7/6/2020 at 9:32 PM, Aftemplate said: I vote for you. The current brush manager is not satisfactory. Well. today I tried to use the Brush tool for retouching during raw development. Help files left me completely frustrated; this tool to that panel to some tab to some kind of menu and back again… Finally, I imported the raw file into Aperture (limping along on Catalina thanks to Retroactive app) and used the Spot & Patch tool to quickly fix the problem. An important difference is that Aperture's Spot & Patch is found in one adjustment panel. Tools (adjustments, controls) in Affinity Photo seem to be scattered by comparison. "Overhaul" could mean different things to different people (e.g., I stopped using Photoshop when Aperture 1.5 was released) but I would like to see Affinity Photo's instrumentalities consolidated. Short of that, help files could be improved by showing pictures of items in context, instead of just an icon that leaves the user searching for pieces of the interface, which may vary depending on persona. Quote
Jowday Posted September 26, 2020 Posted September 26, 2020 7 hours ago, Vulcan said: "Overhaul" could mean different things to different people An UX could sort it all out - and should. Monitor this URL and see if Serif will try to hire an UX before Affinity 2.0. My guess is - unfortunately - no: https://affinity.serif.com/en-gb/careers/ Quote "The user interface is supposed to work for me - I am not supposed to work for the user interface." Computer-, operating system- and software agnostic; I am a result oriented professional. Look for a fanboy somewhere else. “When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger.” ― Confucius Not an Affinity user og forum user anymore. The software continued to disappoint and not deliver.
KC Honie Posted September 27, 2020 Posted September 27, 2020 On 9/25/2020 at 11:03 PM, Jowday said: An UX could sort it all out - and should. Monitor this URL and see if Serif will try to hire an UX before Affinity 2.0. My guess is - unfortunately - no: https://affinity.serif.com/en-gb/careers/ I suspect 2.x's UI is fairly well set in stone at this point... Quote iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, 2017) Mac OS 13 | 4.2 GHz Quad Core Intel-Core i7 | 64GB Ram | Radeon Pro 580 8 GB Capture One Pro | Adobe Photography (Lightroom and Photoshop) | Affinity Designer 2 (for now) | Affinity Photo 2 (for now) | Affinity Publisher 2 (for now) | Topaz Labs Photography Suite | Fast Raw Viewer | NeoFinder | Assorted other tools...
Jowday Posted September 27, 2020 Posted September 27, 2020 2 hours ago, KC Honie said: I suspect 2.x's UI is fairly well set in stone at this point... Without any UX, yes, that is probably true. Quote "The user interface is supposed to work for me - I am not supposed to work for the user interface." Computer-, operating system- and software agnostic; I am a result oriented professional. Look for a fanboy somewhere else. “When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger.” ― Confucius Not an Affinity user og forum user anymore. The software continued to disappoint and not deliver.
walt.farrell Posted September 27, 2020 Posted September 27, 2020 3 hours ago, KC Honie said: I suspect 2.x's UI is fairly well set in stone at this point... Are you assuming that 2.0 will follow 1.9? It certainly might, and I have no knowledge of Serif's plans. But at least one Serif staff member has previously mentioned the possibility of 1.10, 1.11, etc. We really have no idea when Serif will decide it's time for 2.0, and until they announce something I don't think we have any way to know for sure Quote -- Walt Designer, Photo, and Publisher V1 and V2 at latest retail and beta releases PC: Desktop: Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 64GB memory, AMD Ryzen 9 5900 12-Core @ 3.00 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Laptop: Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 32GB memory, Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz, Intel UHD Graphics Comet Lake GT2 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU. Laptop 2: Windows 11 Pro 24H2, 16GB memory, Snapdragon(R) X Elite - X1E80100 - Qualcomm(R) Oryon(TM) 12 Core CPU 4.01 GHz, Qualcomm(R) Adreno(TM) X1-85 GPU iPad: iPad Pro M1, 12.9": iPadOS 18.2.1, Apple Pencil 2, Magic Keyboard Mac: 2023 M2 MacBook Air 15", 16GB memory, macOS Sequoia 15.0.1
KC Honie Posted September 27, 2020 Posted September 27, 2020 ^^^ Yes, I am making the logical assumption that 2.x will follow 1.9.x... 2.x gives Serif a cash infusion. (I am sure a much needed cash infusion). There are a number of issues that desperately need to be fixed that logically would not occur with a dot release. Jowday 1 Quote iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, 2017) Mac OS 13 | 4.2 GHz Quad Core Intel-Core i7 | 64GB Ram | Radeon Pro 580 8 GB Capture One Pro | Adobe Photography (Lightroom and Photoshop) | Affinity Designer 2 (for now) | Affinity Photo 2 (for now) | Affinity Publisher 2 (for now) | Topaz Labs Photography Suite | Fast Raw Viewer | NeoFinder | Assorted other tools...
Pšenda Posted September 27, 2020 Posted September 27, 2020 3 hours ago, KC Honie said: 2.x gives Serif a cash infusion. (I am sure a much needed cash infusion). If version 2.x does not bring any significant improvement over version 1.x - then who and why would buy this "upgrade" from existing users? So assuming that Serif will just change the main version - to make money, is very short-sighted. For the release of version 2.x (if it should really have a financial benefit) it will definitely have to offer a lot of functional changes and improvements. Move Along People 1 Quote Affinity Store (MSI/EXE): Affinity Suite (ADe, APh, APu) 2.5.7.2948 (Retail) Dell OptiPlex 7060, i5-8500 3.00 GHz, 16 GB, Intel UHD Graphics 630, Dell P2417H 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 24H2, Build 26100.2605. Dell Latitude E5570, i5-6440HQ 2.60 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics 530, 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 24H2, Build 26100.2605. Intel NUC5PGYH, Pentium N3700 2.40 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics, EIZO EV2456 1920 x 1200, Windows 10 Pro, Version 21H1, Build 19043.2130.
KC Honie Posted September 27, 2020 Posted September 27, 2020 1 hour ago, Pšenda said: If version 2.x does not bring any significant improvement over version 1.x - then who and why would buy this "upgrade" from existing users? So assuming that Serif will just change the main version - to make money, is very short-sighted. For the release of version 2.x (if it should really have a financial benefit) it will definitely have to offer a lot of functional changes and improvements. Well it goes without saying that the expectation of 2.x would be a major improvement... Quote iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, 2017) Mac OS 13 | 4.2 GHz Quad Core Intel-Core i7 | 64GB Ram | Radeon Pro 580 8 GB Capture One Pro | Adobe Photography (Lightroom and Photoshop) | Affinity Designer 2 (for now) | Affinity Photo 2 (for now) | Affinity Publisher 2 (for now) | Topaz Labs Photography Suite | Fast Raw Viewer | NeoFinder | Assorted other tools...
Ceresede Posted September 28, 2020 Posted September 28, 2020 The interface on ipad pro isn’t acceptable because it’s a problem for the health of eyes. White text on black font? There’s no need for! Quote
emmrecs01 Posted September 29, 2020 Posted September 29, 2020 @Ceresede Welcome to the Affinity forums. Since your comment refers to the interface on iPad I think you should really post to the dedicated iPad suggestions forum here. Jeff fde101 1 Quote Win 11 Pro, intel i7 14700, NVidia GTX 4060, 32G RAM, intel UHD 770. Long-time user of Serif products, chiefly PagePlus and PhotoPlus, but also WebPlus, CraftArtistProfessional and DrawPlus. Delighted to be using Affinity Designer, Photo, and now Publisher, version 1 and now version 2. iPad Pro (12.9") (iOS 18.2) running Affinity Photo and Designer version 1 and all three version 2 apps.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.