Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

Everything posted by Aftemplate

  1. Any recent developments with suggestions for this feature?
  2. Besides. Vector curve length measurement. There is also area measurement.
  3. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25157976 So far there have been two ways to to heavy compute tasks on GPUs: CUDA (Nvidia only) and OpenCL (all vendors). Nvidia invested a lot in software and toolchains to make CUDA the go to option for many projects (especially in the machine learning community). Meanwhile OpenCL is falling apart and sees less and less support and updates. However, the Vulkan API which is also supported by most vendors (except Apple where you have to use a compatibility layer called MoltenVK) is gaining traction in the compute sector. If you trust the benchmarks, th
  4. I like imho. For you previous "another one" comment, I agree with part of it and oppose part of it. But, as you said, it's up to the AP team. So there is no point in arguing between us. Layers are timelines, Low complexity. It is changing at this moment..
  5. No need to apologize. (I don’t want to spend my time saying I’m sorry. I’m not a rude person, I just want to type the most useful words. After listening to your explanation, everything is now clear. (I hope you edit the previous reply and correct it. I want to respond to that.
  6. You misunderstood what I meant. Could you please re-edit it? I'll respond to it. @IPv6
  7. In order to enter fewer words, I didn't make it clear. Now I will make my intentions clear. You may have heard of Autodesk Maya. It allows traditional "layers" while also allowing users to manipulate nodes. Maya is built entirely on a node, and each property has a corresponding node. Which one to use. Depends on what the user likes. I don't want to remove layers. I want layers and nodes to coexist. Nodes are used at this time when the layer is unable to do something. If you can do a two-way conversion between them, that's definitely the best! (But it may make it more difficult for you
  8. Linked Layers Such workarounds will increase complexity. I don't think this is a good plan. Pure layers and pure nodes keep the architecture simple. Combine any two unrelated things together and you will gain complexity, I hate that.
  9. You are still not brave enough. node mode ui needs a true brave there. You can realize their one-way conversion: layer to node(compatibility) The best way to solve a problem is to solve the root cause of the problem.
  10. Now we can count on the hope of 2.x, this heavyweight feature will be available! Andy Somerfield is the Brilliant developer I've ever met, affinity photo is a Breathtaking masterpiece.
  11. (This is the most shocking news I've ever heard this year!)Thank you! @Andy Somerfield I hope, node map is like a building, with multiple layers of drilling links. Avoid map that are too large. and accommodate more nodes. Fully Expose as many nodes as possible and provide an expert mode options to lose warranty: remove all limit. Max freedom!! The person who redefines the rules of the photo editing game is you! Adobe recently acquired Substance Designer. A node editor.
  12. @IPv6 I'm believe the warp real-time filter and the nodeUI will come true!
  13. Do you have plans to implement this Full Nodeization at some point in the future?
  14. - Added “Live Mesh Warp” layers - This allows for better controllable deformation. compared to Liquify. @Andy Somerfield
  15. I've already replied to you, In another topic. Windows Acceleration is garbage and is currently 2 times slower.
  16. Use the same hardware and affinity version. @Mark Ingram Metal has greatly frustrated you OpenCL. you should fight back at Vulkan.
  17. Resampling using linear rather than gamma can effectively eliminate this negative effect. Thank you for everything you have done for Affinity Photos. You deserve to be appreciated. @Andy Somerfield
  18. Detailed description of the problem : https://guide.encode.moe/encoding/resampling.html#downscaling-in-linear-light https://slow.pics/c/U4sMk0tW (Reproduce the problem) https://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/filter/nicolas/#downsampling_examples (Resampling algorithm) My test image (I used it to successfully reproduce the problem in the eye area) Test steps: 1- Open it in the affinity photo 2- Zoom in and view at about 30~40% 3- Adjust the performance preferences of Affinity Photos 4- Switch the view quality in the nearest neighbor/bilinear 5- You will notice a significant change
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please note there is currently a delay in replying to some post. See pinned thread in the Questions forum. These are the Terms of Use you will be asked to agree to if you join the forum. | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.