Pšenda

But only until I start using green pepper - then I'll have a problem again. I guess I'll have to reconsider the structural taxonomy for my spices 🙂

I generally don't use pink salt because, according to all the principles of proper and modern UI, it is stored right next to pink ribbons, and I don't wear them at all - they wouldn't go with my feathers.🦩

Why do you put salt and pepper in the same place? - how is anyone supposed to know! The UI of your apartment is completely unusable for the average user, because salt is white, and belongs in the bedroom with the sheets, and black pepper belongs in the cellar with the coal.

Why is the Exit command for closing the application in the File menu?! How does it relate to the file? I immediately request the creation of a specific Application menu item. Why is the Settings command in the Edit menu? How setting preferences does relate to editing. I immediately request that this item be moved to the new Application menu. Why is the Personas switching command in the File menu - how does it relate to the file? I immediately request that it be moved to the new Application menu. P.S. And I'm not an AI — believe me (otherwise I wouldn't be writing this statement). These are all my thoughts and ideas.

These programs seem to only work with "thumbnails" (created by the camera) when viewing files, not with the actual RAW data. If you only need to view the files (for sorting photos) and not directly develop them, it is better to use a viewer, not a photo editor.

Even though this comparison is original (I would say absurd), it is still possible - but only if it is done from the right perspective. There is a huge difference between buying a house by a complete layman (this is his first house), who is completely clueless about everything, or buying a house by a professional real estate agent, who, even during a few hours of inspection of the house, is able to check hundreds of technical details (such as a rotten roof, leaking windows, problems with groundwater, clogged sewage, etc.), but especially the inappropriate layout of the rooms, inappropriate amenities of the location, etc. Simply because I am a "professional", I should know what I want and what I absolutely need.

FX effects are not visible in the bounding box - their effect on the size of the object is only applied when creating an Artboard or when exporting. For example, this is Outer bevel or Emboss.

You mean make Artboards Pixel perfect? Move tool, select artboard in Layers panel, and see to values in Transform panel - all (position and size) must be whole pixel.

... alternatively, you have an fx on the circle that could also enlarge the object - for example Outer Glow or Outer Shadow.

However, in your request you mention the icon in APhoto, i.e. "Add Pixel Layer". So it is completely irrelevant what something is called in some other program. P.S. There is no problem in requesting the addition (or renaming) of the existing Add Pixel Layer icon to Add Layer you mentioned. However, since there are several layer types in Affinity, see the Layer menu, it will be quite confusing what is actually created after clicking on this icon.

By the way, if you noticed, I was responding to another user's post, not yours, so it doesn't matter what you said or didn't say.

Dragging a layer of any type to the Trash will delete that layer - that's to be expected, since the Trash can delete any type of layer. But what would you expect if you dragged a layer of another type (say a Shape, Text, or Image layer) onto the Add Pixel Layer icon? Should it duplicate the dragged layer and rasterize it (convert to pixel)? Or should it do nothing, since it's not a Pixel layer?