wonderings

1 year is not that long a time. Do you really think Canva bought Affinity for $380 million dollars just to do nothing? Maybe they are in the midst of something that takes time and they want to release with as few bugs as possible? Or would you prefer things just get released ASAP so people get something new an shiny to play with before getting into the posts about bugs and things that need fixing? I have no knowledge of what is going on in the back end but using some logic will tell you that they are not stopping development.

not having something is not a feature. No one is being forced to use AI in other apps. I use Photoshop AI all the time, I can easily not use AI in Photoshop as well, nothing is forcing anyone to use it. I would rather have options than not have options. When you are making your living with the software you want the fastest and easiest path to get the job done. In commercial print and design no one is impressed if you say you did something freehand and it took you hours opposed to using AI and doing it in 2 mins, in fact they don't want to even pay for that anymore. Now I am completely on board with no AI for actual art. I will never display art created by AI, hate the idea of it.

Canva purchase Seriff. So Affinity is owned by Canva.

not sure what you are referencing with the drains.

Not looking for this, but I am getting swastika vibes from the Pump It logo. Has the same basic shape. I would only really care about this if this was a logo for an actual company that someone might bring up at some point.

Definitely video game vibes with this one, particularly because of the instructions themselves, could totally see that in a Zelda game or something like it.

I do agree that without AI Affinity is going to fall behind. I use it daily in Adobe CC and can't imagine working without it now. I like your idea for a stand alone subscription just for the AI. That is really the only way they could do it without going full subscription model for entire thing which I think would be a bad idea based on the user base.

are you able to share the file to see if this is isolated on your computer of happening to others as well?

I would not say Affinity is a long way behind, but the lack of AI does set it back. I use AI daily, it is fantastic for fixing up photos and literally saves hours of time making things that were more intensive to be simple and basic now. I am against AI for art, commercial design for brochures and things like that are not art and I have no problem utilizing AI for that. Affinity has become part of my "tool kit", somewhat regularly I will get a PDF that I need to try and edit in Illustrator. The file will be missing the supporting files but show high res in Acrobat. Now obviously the missing file is there but for some reason Illustrator can't or does not want to see it. I drop that same file in Designer 2 and it maintains the high res elements to the file and basically gives me the missing file that was not embedded. There are places where Affinity is way faster as well, which I think is in part of the software being much newer it does not have the same bloat that Adobe can have. Some files that can slow down my M1 Max will run smoother in Affinity and save me time by letting me do some simple things to fix the file all quickly with next to no lag. If this is your living then you need to use the software that is best for you. I have no brand loyalty, I pay for what lets me get the job done the fastest and easiest. Don't make it emotional, just think functional.

What they have allows you to get in elements of a photoshop file. This is a nice thing if you are migrating from one work flow to another, ie Adobe to Affinity. I remember when Quark was the big layout application and then time and effort that went into migrating to Indesign. Thankfully we had the app side by side so was not as big a deal as it would be now keeping an Adobe subscription along side the purchase of Affinity. I am not opposed to this being improved, but I think there are probably a lot more things to do in Affinity then worry about how well they import a different applications files. It will always be an uphill battle as apps change and evolve. With AI fully integrated into Adobe CC this will probably get even more difficult with Affinity not having AI at all. Yes there is a solution to everything, it just might not be the solution you want. In my head when working I want the easiest and simplest solution. You want to work with PSD files, the simplest solution is to use Photoshop. Now I understand that you don't want to pay the monthly subscription fee as you are most likely just designing or playing around with it as a hobby and not as a professional. You say Affinity can do all the work, but for you it seems it can't because again you want to work with Photoshop files in an app that is not photoshop. There will always be an element of fighting and wrestling with the files make something not created by Affinity or for Affinity. Not sure how the app is not 100% functional by not being able to run non native files. Also not sure why you need compassion, there is no ill will here or attacks against you. I think your needs don't make a lot of sense for what Affinity is doing.

I do understand what you want, you want better compatibility with PSD files in Affinity. So you want Affinity to better translate the file to use in Affinity. This is always going to have issues, like people trying to work collaboratively while using different software, most cases here is Publisher and Indesign. It is a horrible idea for that. Now I know you are not wanting to work collaboratively but you are wanting Affinity to make it so it opens Photoshop files perfectly or very close. Which is why I suggest that if you really want to work with Photoshop files then it would be best to work with Photoshop itself. Or develop and design yourself direct in Affinity. It might even be a good way for you to learn the software better. Take the photoshop file you want to use and instead of bringing it in try and recreate it from scratch. Lots of people to help on this forum and I am sure in other places.

If you need to use Photoshop I would recommend using Photoshop. Or learn how Affinity Photo works and excels and do it their way. Seems a weird suggestion as well, you want Affinity to out do Adobe.... by supporting Adobe formats better?

Most people design for print or not going digital with it. You can run a preflight to convert to RGB but how that will convert the colours I am not sure, I never go that direction. Do E-Readers have high resolution screens? I have old black and white kindle, images would look horrible on it, are newer ones high resolution that you would benefit from the wide colour gamut of RGB?

not recommended at all. Your artwork is going to be converted again to CMYK by the print shop doing the print shop. There are no RGB printers, they all convert. In the majority of cases you will not see huge colour shifts but there are lots of brighter vibrant colours that will change, as well as skin tones. We had a big fancy Xerox digital press some years ago that if an RGB image went in with people and the skin tones looked ok, when the Xerox would convert they would come out with red faces. If you work with a CMYK workflow you will have a much better idea of what you are going to get when it comes to printing even without a colour calibrated monitor. Sending PNG's for print even if they were CMYK is not a great idea because it is rasterizing everything. For best results export as PDF. Your printer will prefer that 100% as workflows are pretty much all based on PDF. PNG is just going to get converted to CMYK and then to PDF.

One change which might offer some hope is Affinity was purchased by Canva which does support Hindi. Canva brings a lot more resources to Affinity so maybe in a much closer future you might see Hindi support. Strong recommended to try out demos before purchasing any software to make sure it does what you need it to do.