A_B_C Posted January 11, 2020 Posted January 11, 2020 My sincerest congratulations to the new version! Awesome work! One small observation though. I am still somewhat unhappy with the Divide operation, and since my issue is already described in a post from some years ago, I’ll take the liberty to just post the link. In my opinion, Divide should work like this, but (C) is still different. Would be cool to have this reviewed for 1.8! Thank you! Alex https://forum.affinity.serif.com/index.php?/topic/12629-affinity-designer-customer-beta-1351/&page=4&tab=comments#comment-56676 Oval 1
Staff MattP Posted January 12, 2020 Staff Posted January 12, 2020 Hi Alex! 'Divide' is not implemented correctly and really needs reimplementing... It introduces strange shapes and arguably just produces the wrong outputs (as shown). The other operations are working better now, but I need more time with 'Divide' still... Matt Uwe367, ashf, Frozen Death Knight and 2 others 4 1
ELinder Posted January 12, 2020 Posted January 12, 2020 7 hours ago, MattP said: Hi Alex! 'Divide' is not implemented correctly and really needs reimplementing... It introduces strange shapes and arguably just produces the wrong outputs (as shown). The other operations are working better now, but I need more time with 'Divide' still... Matt Well darn, my hopes were that the improvements in Booleans included bug 'afd-2042'. Speaking of which, it would be very helpful to include specific bug numbers where appropriate in the list of fixes and improvements for the beta releases. Erich Jowday 1
A_B_C Posted January 12, 2020 Author Posted January 12, 2020 Thank you, Matt! No pressure. I wasn’t entirely clear to what extend you’ve already had time to work on the Booleans. You did a wonderful job on the Expand Stroke function. It produces such an accurate, elegant output now! I don’t know how you did it, but the results are just awesome! Alex ronnyb, Boldlinedesign and MattP 3
mdriftmeyer Posted January 14, 2020 Posted January 14, 2020 Not to put too much pressure on the developers, but that's a basic boolean operation that should be fully functional before the 1.8 release time. Oval and Jowday 1 1
Oval Posted January 14, 2020 Posted January 14, 2020 17 hours ago, mdriftmeyer said: should be fully functional before the 1.8 release time +1 Solution: time machine
fde101 Posted January 14, 2020 Posted January 14, 2020 21 minutes ago, Oval said: time machine Unfortunately, Apple's Time Machine can only go backwards. They haven't solved the forward-in-time aspect of it yet (backing things up before they are created). Alfred, Wosven, A_B_C and 2 others 5
A_B_C Posted January 14, 2020 Author Posted January 14, 2020 I believe to remember that Matt once said that the Divide operation isn’t just a simple operation (or that it is at least unlike the other ones) and requires a series of algorithms to be performed. So there seem to be some complications in play. MattP, Boldlinedesign and Jowday 2 1
Jowday Posted October 2, 2020 Posted October 2, 2020 Priorities are at play. And you are paying. With years of life and lost opportunities. Will you wait another year for a fix? Two? More? They are not trying to figure out and implement cold fusion. Rather implement a working and acceptable divide operation that should have worked properly since 2015. You are waiting because they let you wait. But you will get Publisher on iPad I guess. Artcraft 1 "The user interface is supposed to work for me - I am not supposed to work for the user interface." Computer-, operating system- and software agnostic; I am a result oriented professional. Look for a fanboy somewhere else. “When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger.” ― Confucius Not an Affinity user og forum user anymore. The software continued to disappoint and not deliver.
A_B_C Posted October 5, 2020 Author Posted October 5, 2020 “Years of life and lost opportunities”: I get what you mean, though I wouldn’t describe myself as depending on a piece of software that much … 😉
Recommended Posts