Jump to content

Asser82

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    141

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

53 Good

See reputation activity

About Asser82

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

579 profile views
  1.    Asser82 reacted to a post in a topic: Color problem with Nik Collection plugins
  2.    Patrick Connor reacted to a post in a topic: Affinity Publisher (1.7) Launch Announcement
  3. Asser82

    Affinity Publisher (1.7) Launch Announcement

    Asser82 replied to Patrick Connor's topic in News and Information

    Nice work, Hopefully GPU acceleration on windows will also get some love in the future. In addition a Lightroom like app would be cool, where a virtual copy of a raw file could be edited in Photo via Studio Link.
  4.    Petar Petrenko reacted to a post in a topic: Phoто Customer Beta - 1.7.1.404 RC2
  5. Asser82

    Phoто Customer Beta - 1.7.1.404 RC2

    Asser82 replied to Petar Petrenko's topic in Photo Beta on Windows

    There is a keynote in two days. There we will see, what comes next after Publisher. At least it is announced that way.
  6.    colin_g2011 reacted to a post in a topic: AP 1.7.0 Slow Raw Performance
  7.    Mesquito reacted to a post in a topic: AP 1.7.0 Slow Raw Performance
  8.    PaulAffinity reacted to a post in a topic: AP 1.7.0 Slow Raw Performance
  9.    Frozen Death Knight reacted to a post in a topic: AP 1.7.0 Slow Raw Performance
  10.    Patrick Connor reacted to a post in a topic: AP 1.7.0 Slow Raw Performance
  11. Asser82

    AP 1.7.0 Slow Raw Performance

    Asser82 replied to elbingo's topic in Photo Bugs found on Windows

    Perhaps offer two denoise algorithms: 1) Fast and ordinary one (default) 2) Slow and perfect one (option) The ones, who select 2) have time to wait. The ones who do not care (1)), have fast develop times. Same strategy works well in DxO PhotoLab with ordinary denoise and prime denoise.
  12.    Wumpus reacted to a post in a topic: Call for Camera Images
  13.    WMax70 reacted to a post in a topic: Color problem with Nik Collection plugins
  14. Asser82
    I have also written to a resposive forum moderator to shortcut you to the NIK department, so hopefully things will go the right way. At least we will now, which side has work to do :-)
  15.    WMax70 reacted to a post in a topic: Color problem with Nik Collection plugins
  16. Asser82
    I have already reposted the current progress here. https://feedback.dxo.com/t/maybe-improved-nik-support-in-affinity-incoming/7907 But speaking developer to developer would speed up things.
  17.    Asser82 reacted to a post in a topic: Color problem with Nik Collection plugins
  18. Asser82

    New NIK Collection Released by DXO

    Asser82 replied to Russ2's topic in Resources

    Just for your information: There is a new release of the DxO NIK, which has targeted some crashes with Affinity Photo on Mac. They are explicitely working on a better compatibility with Affinity Photo now: https://nikcollection.dxo.com/release-notes/
  19. Asser82
    Or you buy AcdSee Pro for around 50€/$. It replaces Lightroom very well in terms of DAM for me and the payed amount is a one time fee for many years.
  20. Asser82
    DxO is becomeing more customer oriented. There is a public feature request board available. You can now vote for official Affinity support for NIK here: https://feedback.dxo.com/t/official-support-of-nik-plugins-with-affinity-software/3283/1
  21. Asser82

    Introducing... Affinity Spotlight

    Asser82 replied to KateM's topic in News and Information

    First my heart jumped...because I thought spotlight might be the Affinity lightroom. But thinking about it, I remembered, that I read a RAW vs JPEG article on spotlight yesterday, which was great. So, thx for this.
  22. Asser82
    Yes, I also do not understand why a print layouting tool is preferred to a DAM / RAW tool. Looking at the Facebook follower of Adobe products: Photoshop: 7.6 Mio -> Affinity Photo Illustrator: 1.5 Mio -> Affinity Designer Lightroom: 1.4 Mio -> Missing InDesign: 0.7 Mio -> Affinity Publisher the Lightroom clone should come first, because it has a twice as large user base. But maybe such a tool is harder to make, because of the different RAW formats, camera/lens profiles, metadata stuff and undocumented raw features. Hence the decission, to postpone it to later. Making a DAM tool can really be a time sink.
  23. Asser82
    Ah, good to know, thx.
  24. Asser82
    Maybe some sort of user defined preset or template functionality could help which could be applied as default starting point, when the user opens a raw. This way the user could set up the settings from the video as default preset. Today's raw tools tend to do more 'Auto' with more or less success.
  25. Asser82

    Call for Camera Images

    Asser82 replied to Mark Ingram's topic in News and Information

    And if you make a DAM, please make the window which contains the preview tiles dockable. This will allow the user: 1) to dock it to the centre to see many tiles at once. 2) to dock it as filmstrip to the bottom to place a large preview window to the centre for culling It would also work with 1) only, but would not be that flexible.
  26. Asser82

    Call for Camera Images

    Asser82 replied to Mark Ingram's topic in News and Information

    Cool finding, comment at the bottom: raw.pixls.us is used by darktable for regression testing of rawspeed and by RawTherapee. It is available for any projects that need access to a library of raw files.
  27. Asser82

    Call for Camera Images

    Asser82 replied to Mark Ingram's topic in News and Information

    @Mark Ingram If you need some inspiration, have a look on IMatch. Not from the usability and visual design point of view, but from its capabilities and the possibility to be used with different raw development tools. Looking at it, Lightroom becomes really limited. Especially the metadata, version and buddy file handling are unique. Maybe this can help to make the right decissions. Wish you good luck.
×

Important Information

These are the Terms of Use you will be asked to agree to if you join the forum. | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

  I accept