Staff Patrick Connor Posted November 26, 2017 Staff Posted November 26, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, harrym said: Interesting point, hadn't thought about this before. When working with the beta I've always just reported anything I find. Some clarification from the team may be useful. When they post 7 changes maybe the only thing they want feedback on are those seven items and any related fallout everything else might just be noise to them? Regards I actually think my comment was out of place and wrong, sorry. I thought I had posted into the 1.6.7 beta 1 thread, where there have only been a few changes since the release build 1.6.6. As this thread is 1.6.1.93 it includes changes not listed here, in build 92, 91 & 90 since the last release 1.6.0.89. So it is fair comment that other things may have changed as a consequence of the fixes and improvements. So it is perfectly fair to comment on any aspect of the program in beta threads. However if you notice no difference between the release and the current beta it seems a bit off topic to say so here, but not banned. Edited November 26, 2017 by Patrick Connor Versions corrected Patrick Connor Serif Europe Ltd Latest V2 releases on each platform Help make our apps better by joining our beta program! "There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man. True nobility lies in being superior to your previous self." W. L. Sheldon
harrym Posted November 26, 2017 Posted November 26, 2017 46 minutes ago, Patrick Connor said: I actually think my comment was out of place and wrong, sorry. I thought I had posted into the 1.6.7 beta 1 thread, where there have only been a few changes since the release build 1.6.6. As this thread is 1.6.1.63 it includes changes not listed here, in build 62, 61 & 60 since the last release 1.6.0.59. So it is fair comment that other things may have changed as a consequence of the fixes and improvements. So it is perfectly fair to comment on any aspect of the program in beta threads. However if you notice no difference between the release and the current beta it seems a bit off topic to say so here, but not banned. Hi Patrick, First, It's Sunday night what the heck are you doing here! Second, I hope my post wasn't taken as criticism in any way? absolutely no need to apologise to me for anything! Regards
PaulAffinity Posted November 26, 2017 Posted November 26, 2017 Once .93 was live there was no beta.... No beta can be downloaded. From a bug's perspective all bugs and queries should be logged against live .93. They require ALL issues to be logged so they can be checked. Cheers P
PaulAffinity Posted November 26, 2017 Posted November 26, 2017 1 hour ago, Patrick Connor said: I actually think my comment was out of place and wrong, sorry. I thought I had posted into the 1.6.7 beta 1 thread, where there have only been a few changes since the release build 1.6.6. As this thread is 1.6.1.63 it includes changes not listed here, in build 62, 61 & 60 since the last release 1.6.0.59. So it is fair comment that other things may have changed as a consequence of the fixes and improvements. So it is perfectly fair to comment on any aspect of the program in beta threads. However if you notice no difference between the release and the current beta it seems a bit off topic to say so here, but not banned. Er.... Patrick this is .93 not .63. My understanding is that Live and Beta are now identical code. Paul Patrick Connor 1
Rick G Posted November 26, 2017 Posted November 26, 2017 1 hour ago, PaulAffinity said: Once .93 was live there was no beta.... No beta can be downloaded. From a bug's perspective all bugs and queries should be logged against live .93. They require ALL issues to be logged so they can be checked. Cheers P Hofnaar 1 Affinity Designer 2.2.2075 & beta 2.3.1.2212 Affinity Photo 2.2.2075 beta 2.3.1.2212Affinity Publisher 2.2.2075 & beta 2.3.1.2212 Windows 11 Pro Version 22H2 OS build 22621.1928 Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10700 CPU @ 2.90GHz 2.90 GHz Installed RAM 16.0 GB (15.7 GB usable) System type 64-bit operating system, x64-based processor
Iam1of2 Posted November 27, 2017 Posted November 27, 2017 Didn't see any comment regarding this issue, but I have had a problem with 1.6.1.93 and the selection brush. The marching ants indicating the selected area show only across the bottom and right side of the selected area when that area selected reaches the top and left sides of the image. The area selected does faithfully display when choosing to create a layer. However knowing ahead of time, is a guess.
PaulAffinity Posted November 27, 2017 Posted November 27, 2017 9 hours ago, Rick G said: I know Rick G... Read my previous posts.. Beta .93 forum thread should have been locked and closed by a Mod when Live .93 was released. (Same code) Cheers, Paul
Mark Ingram Posted November 27, 2017 Author Posted November 27, 2017 Even if I locked the thread, it wouldn't stop you from making new posts in the beta forum about things. I think the rule should be pretty simple, if it only happens in the beta (and not latest retail version) report it in the beta forum. If it happens in the latest retail version too, report it in the general Bugs forum. Gnobelix, Alfred and Roger C 3
Aammppaa Posted November 27, 2017 Posted November 27, 2017 Lock the beta forum if there isn't a current beta? Relying on people to follow any sort of rule sounds awfully risky to me PaulAffinity and Rick G 2 Win10 Home x64 | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X @ 3.7GHz | 48 GB RAM | 1TB SSD | nVidia GTX 1660 | Wacom Intuos Pro
Rick G Posted November 27, 2017 Posted November 27, 2017 1 hour ago, Aammppaa said: Lock the beta forum if there isn't a current beta? Relying on people to follow any sort of rule sounds awfully risky to me Amen to the rules. As soon as a new beta is released, this whole question becomes moot until the next release. Kindness rules. We are customers that believe in the products to the point we love beta testing them. I hope they keep that in mind Affinity Designer 2.2.2075 & beta 2.3.1.2212 Affinity Photo 2.2.2075 beta 2.3.1.2212Affinity Publisher 2.2.2075 & beta 2.3.1.2212 Windows 11 Pro Version 22H2 OS build 22621.1928 Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10700 CPU @ 2.90GHz 2.90 GHz Installed RAM 16.0 GB (15.7 GB usable) System type 64-bit operating system, x64-based processor
Iam1of2 Posted November 29, 2017 Posted November 29, 2017 (edited) On 11/25/2017 at 1:09 PM, mapline said: Same here my x-t20 compressed RAF takes 40sec! Good when open. I don't have any magic, and after reading your posts, I clocked the load time on several RAF images and they averaged just a tic over 4 seconds. Computer is a MSI with i7 processor, 32 GB ram, and Invidia 930 graphics card. Just another bit of info, my desktop which is a 2012 ASUS with an i5 with 8GB and another older Invidia card was a bit longer, but not unexpected because the specs aren't there. Just tried 4 more raws to see if I was dreaming and I got 5.5, 6.4, 4.1, 4.6 - all files about 18.9 mb in size. I am loading from a folder on the hard drive, not off of the SD card or from camera. Edited November 29, 2017 by Iam1of2 left out important info.
Mark Ingram Posted November 29, 2017 Author Posted November 29, 2017 1.6.2.94 is now available. PaulAffinity 1
Recommended Posts