-
Posts
165 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
kevinmcsherry got a reaction from GarryP in Catalonia by Motor Scooter Poster
Pencils, lots of tracing paper, Indian ink and AD. I've created a series of these retro style posters around the theme of the 1960s, modernism, etc. You can see them all here: https://www.facebook.com/scooterola/
-
kevinmcsherry got a reaction from MEB in Catalonia by Motor Scooter Poster
Pencils, lots of tracing paper, Indian ink and AD. I've created a series of these retro style posters around the theme of the 1960s, modernism, etc. You can see them all here: https://www.facebook.com/scooterola/
-
kevinmcsherry got a reaction from Patrick Connor in Testing Affinity Publisher (Mac) Auto-Update
Nope. I was wrong. It opened perfectly. Sorry about that...
Mutter, mutter...
-
kevinmcsherry got a reaction from Patrick Connor in Testing Affinity Publisher (Mac) Auto-Update
It worked fine for me, although it opened on a blank screen whereby I had to Reset Studio to see all the tools panels, etc. I could still start a new project, it was just slightly disconcerting.
Kevin
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
kevinmcsherry got a reaction from Kurt J. Meyer in Table of contents and hyperlinks
Agreed, hyperlinks needed.
-
kevinmcsherry got a reaction from IndieGuy in Shark!
I did an illustration in acrylics more than twenty years ago and just decided to recreate it as a vector image.
It took me half the time to make it. I'm thoroughly convinced!
Kevin
-
kevinmcsherry reacted to toltec in CMYK problems with printer's RIP
A software RIP (Raster Interface Processor) converts an image file into film (usually). Basically, a printer driver.
Some RIPs are better than others as they are programs and made by different companies. The same way Photo editing programs are made by different companies and some RIPs struggle more than others. So you could try a different printer.
If your file is really too complex, with too many nodes or maybe too many gradients it can overwhelm any RIP. A couple of decades ago gradient fills use to cause problems, I can't speak for modern RIPs..
The different things you describe are not related. CMYK has nothing to do with curves or flattening.
Outputting to PDF will absolutely not flatten the drawing.
Flattening. In Photo (Document > Flatten) turns multiple layers into one single image layer. Vectors are converted to bitmaps.
However, what I suggest you do is
1 Convert the document to CMYK. Document > Colour Format > CMYK.
2 Resize the document to A1. Document > Resize Document
If you need bleed (almost certain) make it a few mm bigger all around.
+
This one happens to be A1 landscape.
2 ASK THE PRINTER WHAT RESOLUTION IT SHOULD BE. For litho, normally 300 dpi, for a poster, I suspect much less.
3 Export as JPEG in that resolution. The one above is 300 dpi
4 Set the JPEG quality to 85% (see below)
What you want is a huge CMYK JPEG. Despite that, the file size should only be a few Megabytes. (Less than 10) It is 9.13MB below.
Tell the printer that it is for an A1 poster.
He should easily be able to cope with that.
When you do documents in the future. Start as A1 at 300 dpi and output as I suggested above.
You might want to output the text as text (rather than part of the JPEG)
Load the huge background CMYK image into Photo and put the text and text frames on top. Export the whole thing as a PDF
-
kevinmcsherry got a reaction from Maxxxworld in CMYK problems with printer's RIP
Hi all. I wasn't sure where to post this question, since I can only see an option to post questions for the iPad. Mine is about Designer in OS X. Please move the topic if it's in the wrong place.
I create posters -usually around A1 physical size, they're a mixture of sometimes very complex vector layers (as I convert mono drawings as in the example attached) and raster layers for ageing and texture. They can be around 150 -200MB. I also create them in CMYK since I was told that the colour space has a wider gamut. I have converted to RGB for one large format printer and they've had no problem at all outputting posters.
Now -the problem: I sent these files as CMYK PDFs (reduced in physical size to A3) to a different printer, since that's what they wanted and my files caused all sorts of problems. Crashed the RIP (whatever that is) and generally took aeons to process. I had to cancel the task before I alienated this chap. Anyway, he said that the files weren't flattened -and that there were thousands of vector curves and the RIP couldn't handle them. So my question is -doesn't exporting to a PDF do the flattening anyway? Even after I exported to TIFF and then again to PDF, there were still problems. Can anyone tell me what best practice is for sending to a trade printer who wants CMYK files?
Looking forward to hearing from anyone with expertise!
Best regards,
Kevin
-
kevinmcsherry reacted to WhiteX in Flatten In Designer?
Hello JET,
as far as I know Flatten means making one layer from several layers, regardless if it's raster or vector. I don't confuse the terms, I'd like to "expand" the design first, and "flatten" next. You can see my attachments and previous comments to understand why I want this. (In short, I just want to get transparent strokes cut out of multiple shapes without one hundred of boolean operations). Most of my questions were partially answered, but I still can't seem to find an answer how to get correct vector output when using layers in "Erase" mode. I really don't care how many layers I have, but flattening the layers was how I could burn the visible layers into one previously (in Illustrator). Affinity Designer seems to have a different workflow for preparing a design for delivery and printing.
Thanks!
-
kevinmcsherry got a reaction from stokerg in Refine Selection
Dammit!
Thank you -I was going up and down the View menu like Mr Magoo. I had forgotten it's called the context toolbar.
It's all good now -thanks again to you both.
Kevin
-
kevinmcsherry got a reaction from Patrick Connor in Refine Selection
Dammit!
Thank you -I was going up and down the View menu like Mr Magoo. I had forgotten it's called the context toolbar.
It's all good now -thanks again to you both.
Kevin
-
kevinmcsherry reacted to stokerg in Refine Selection
Hi kevinmcsherry,
Unless i'm missing something, it doesn't appear there is a selection present in the screenshot, no what would be marching ants.
Make a selection with any of the selection tools and you should have a Refine button along the top toolbar (see attached)
-
kevinmcsherry reacted to Patrick Connor in Refine Selection
You have a missing context toolbar. Use "View" > "Show Context Toolbar"
-
kevinmcsherry got a reaction from fernandolins86 in Guilloché pattern (Spirograph patterns)
For anyone who's a newbie like me, here's the 'Power Duplicate' video here. It explains the basics of how Dutchshader made those patterns: https://vimeo.com/110124748