emmrecs01

not much of help.    

not much of help..

not much of help. 

Can’t see the problems you are talking about because the screen recordings are so bad.
So instead of just swearing, try to describe clearly what the problems are that you are experiencing.. 

Your language is not up to the standards of this forum.
you have one scan option working pretty well. You can’t provide screen recordings using OS tools, instead using shaky smartphone camera. I can’t spot any real problem.
sorry for giving honest answer to your question.

It might help other people who are looking for a solution to the same problem, and come across this thread looking for answers, if you say how you resolved it.

I recommend using the Trial version and "properly" trying it out. Hard to judge what "smooth transfer of workflow" means for you.

Hi @veritheon
Yes, the universal license gives you the freedom to use all 3 programs of the suite on all platforms (Windows, MacOS or IOS). And that on as many devices as you personally manage. Individual licenses only for the program and limited to the platform for which they were purchased.
With Microsoft you only get the individual programs, to what extent this is the case with Apple is beyond my knowledge.
In any case, I would recommend that you purchase the license directly from the Serif store.

I've said this umpteen times: it's quite beyond me how and why Serif decide to make some settings sticky (like the number of pages in a new document), but not others (like always exporting as single pages). Why on earth can't they just let the user decide what defaults they want?

They may have plans for AI but Affinity do not disclose their app development plans/roadmap so it's just guesswork as to what will be in the apps in the future.

To me, Walt, it's the same concern. The individual using an AI app, that has sourced its material without asking permission, is just as bad as the AI corporation. The one is stealing, the other is handling stolen goods. Just my opinion.

I think it's a good future for free accounts but idk why paid users should treat like this? if i registers my email account to forums and have some purchases on the same account it should automatically removed me from non-paid accounts because paid accounts don't share spam that often.
because i feels this rule farce me to do xx amount of passive comments just to get the privilege , it's the same to stackflow most people spam "grammar and typo" fix to farm their points.

Is that a question about keyboard shortcuts, or a feature request for more shortcuts, or just a statement about the existing shortcuts?
Because InDesign and Publisher have different ways of working, and have different feature sets, there will probably always be certain shortcuts in one which don’t (and may never have) have an equivalent in the other.
If you can be a bit more specific about what you are wanting/suggesting/asking then we can probably help further.

Which, of course, like everything generated by AI, is accurate and completely reliable! 😁
 

I like the new version but I can't buy it now, I still have the old version, until I buy it I will have to use alternative methods to reuse one or more files created in the new version, so next time I am already aware that I will only do tests until I make the purchase if I don't have this bad experience.

Too bad experience... I've tested the new version and I'm obliged to buy it? 

Why can't we save v1 format files from v2???
This is a real adobe level bait and switch. Absolutely crazy that there is no way to pass files between the versions.

Who gave you these instructions?
So this is an exercise to familiarise yourself with Affinity Publisher, to create a template for repeatable web graphic generation in publisher for export into file formats, such as png, webp and jpeg. 

This is not a good idea to ask existing license holders of version 1.0 to pay for version 2.0 upgrade, generally it comes free.

I have now done that, but nobody else seems confused and if they are I will tell them

"These Forums are not for sharing AI created artwork, or discussions regarding AI prompts to create specific images.
The 'Share your work' section of the Forums are designed for sharing work specifically created within or using the Affinity apps.
When sharing work, we ask users to provide an explanation of the tools/workflows they used with the Affinity apps, so that other members can have a better idea of the possibilities of the Affinity apps functions - though this is not a strict requirement."
Opening a picture or photo and then printing or exporting it unedited is not sufficient to be covered under the term "using", even though technically English is unclear on this. "using" in that sentence means adding to or changing in a significant or non-obvious, novel or interesting way that others may appreciate.   

No it was not. If you want to play semantics (which you always do) then I could change the definition of what is allowed to make sure they are excluded. Stop bellyaching. Just assume that we will not allow them no matter what the wording says, because that is what is happening, like it or not.

While I somehow understand your frustration, do not blame others for your own faults. What you buy is clearly mentioned on several pages on Serifs website.
When I moved from my Macbook back to Windows several years ago, I checked upfront whether my licenses are valid on the new platform.

I don't use Photo a lot but in Publisher, I sometimes use the Pixel persona for specific photo tasks. If I encounter a problem there, should I post my question in Publisher, Photo or General section?
Also when in the respective main persona, there are tools common to the 3 apps and others specific to this app. How should I know which are which?
For example, Text styles, Paragraph and Character panels are common to the 3 apps but Text Frame and TOC panels are specific to Publisher.
This means if I have a problem with a coloured text frame in Designer (it happens: [1], [2],…), I'll probably need to use Publisher to correct it. So what? Where to post?
I agree though that better using tags when needed should be helpful.  

It is repeatedly shown that the way of setting the page orientation is not intuitive. Users are looking for orientation settings on the right side of the window.