Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Belmont

    Slow performance still

    Just realized something...the performance problem only happens when dragging the size handle in the bottom right. If I drag any of the other corners it works fine. Strange.
  2. Belmont

    Slow performance still

    Excellent, thanks.
  3. It seems the performance in the newest beta is still messed up. See the movie I attached. All I did was create a new document, float the window, then drag t he window size handle around. This doesn't happen in the production version. My computer is a windows 10 machine running an i5 processor and 2 GB NVidia card. Nothing to brag about but totally sufficient for Affinity. Matt 0001-0213.mp4
  4. Has anything be found out about the problems described above?
  5. Same problem here. It is even worse if you try and resize a floating window.
  6. The procedural textures are a neat idea but they seem very unusable unless you have a math degree. The same was true with the equations filter. Perhaps making some sort of user friendly interface would increase their usage and make them more useful? Or at least substantial documentation with lots of examples.
  7. I second all of these suggestions. I was just trying to replicate my process for gathering up pictures for scapbooking and these deficiencies make the whole process take 10 times as long as it does in photoshop. It's simple things like this that make the program so much more useful. I realize I could come up with a different process that might fit AP better but these suggestions seem so 'simple' and logical. Another example: I convert all images to 320 dpi for printing (that is how the printer wants them). So when making a layout I create a 12x12 320 dpi image to create the scrapbook layout. Now I open each picture that will go on that layout. They open with 72 dpi so I have to convert them. In PS all I do is grab the crop tool, set it to 320 dpi (once per session) and then crop the image to whatever size I need. It automatically converts it to 320 dpi thus killing the proverbial two birds with one stone. In AP I have to create a new 12x12 document. Then open up the image. Go to resize document, click type in 320 dpi, uncheck resample image, then click ok. Then I have to grab the crop tool and crop. This obviously take much longer. There are MANY other example. Still love the program but it does take more work to do many things.
  8. Sorry, when I said beta I meant the pre-release version. This isn't like affinity where they have a beta version that is actually a later version being tested. This was the release BEFORE the final release was put out so it is actually older. If I didn't push the highlights all the way down then it wasn't quite so scary. They introduced a Raw Develop 'filter' in the release version that helps the highlight recovery a lot (among other things).
  9. Here are 4 more programs for you: DXO Optics 10 DXO Optics 11 Luminar 2018 beta Luminar 2018 (final) All I did with these was load the image in and drag the highlights down to the minimum. I pulled the highlights all the way back which I wouldn't do normally but I wanted to see what would happen. RawSamples.pdf
  10. Can you supply the raw file and we can run it through other programs we work with?
  11. Wouldn't you know, I'm on Windows. Is this something that is planned?
  12. In photoshop it is very convenient to be able to drag a layer from one image and plop it in another open image. I haven't found a way to do that in AP yet. I suppose one could select the right layer, copy, then go to the new document and paste but it is so much easier to see the layer you want in the layer list, grab it and drag to the new document having it create a copy of the layer there. I've tried various things and ended up with frustrating results (it not creating a new layer but 'pasting' the image into an existing layer for one). Perhaps I'm just going about it wrong. Is there a way to do this drag and drop layer procedure with AP?
  13. I have had really good experiences with Luminar 2018 so far (granted I have only been using it for a couple days). Every raw image I threw at was processed reasonably quickly on a mid range machine and the ease of getting a nice looking image is terrific. I can pull up a raw image (CR2) and spit out a nice looking final render in under a couple minutes. In DXO it would have taken me WAY longer to get a comparable image and many times I couldn't have done it solely in DXO. Granted, the noise reduction is better in DXO and it handles lens distortion better but when your end project is to get a nice picture to put in a scrapbook or on the wall, those high end features really don't come into play. DXO also always introduced artifacts into my images when I used some of those higher end features (chromatic aberration fixes and lens sharpness) so I don't miss them much. If I needed to process a high ISO image I can always pop into DXO and use the noise reduction there. There are some bugs to work out still but the same holds true for Affinity. I don't feel like the speed of the program is that slow. I can pull up a full quality raw image from my T3i, add several filters to it and even another layer or adjustments with a mask and still have it working pretty much real time (on a i5 8GB machine). In fact, I find it to be at or better than the performance of DXO. Compared to NIK, for simply processing a photo to get a nice picture, I can get a quality look quicker in Luminar. Obviously NIK has other features which aren't part of Luminar's scope so it doesn't do any good comparing those. I look forward to the additions that are promised. I always by software on what is currently available though, not what they promise will come later. There is always less disappointment that way. I haven't tried using it as a plug in in Affinity yet. If that works it would be icing on the cake.
  14. When I use a brush with the wet edges box checked that setting sticks and applies to every other brush I use. Steps to reproduce 1. Open a new session of AP 2. Create a new document 3. Select the brush tool and select one of the basic round brushes. The wet edges check box shouldn't be checked. 4. paint a little on the document 5. Change the brush to something that has wet edges checked. There are some in the DAUB Bristles or DAUB Gouache categories. You should see the wet edges checkbox become selected 6. Now go back and select the original brush used in step 3. You should see that the wet edges setting is still checked when it should be off according to the brush settings.
  15. Great, thanks. Love the program by the way. It takes a little while to learn the Affinity way of doing things (as opposed to PS) but the results are getting better and better.