atfitzy Posted January 9, 2018 Posted January 9, 2018 (edited) How do I convert this (Seahawks) to this (screenshot)? Edited January 9, 2018 by atfitzy Quote
Staff MEB Posted January 9, 2018 Staff Posted January 9, 2018 Hi atfitzy, Welcome to Affinity Forums Which program are you using Affinity Designer or Photo? Quote A Guide to Learning Affinity Software
atfitzy Posted January 9, 2018 Author Posted January 9, 2018 I'm using Designer but I have both. Quote
Alfred Posted January 9, 2018 Posted January 9, 2018 You can do this quite easily with the Mesh Warp Tool in Affinity Photo. firstdefence 1 Quote Alfred Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for Windows • Windows 10 Home/Pro Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for iPad • iPadOS 17.5.1 (iPad 7th gen)
John Rostron Posted January 10, 2018 Posted January 10, 2018 You could also use Filter > Distort > Equations and for the y parameter enter: y=y+a*h*x*(w-x)/w/w The a parameter controls how much the curve extends upwards (as a fraction of the height, h). The expression x*(w-x)/w/w varies from zero at 0 and 1, to 0.25 when half way. You would need to rasterize the text first. Quote Windows 11, Affinity Photo 2.4.2 Designer 2.4.2 and Publisher 2.4.2 (mainly Photo). CPU: Intel Core i5 8500 @ 3.00GHz. RAM: 32.0GB DDR4 @ 1063MHz, Graphics: 2047MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
Alfred Posted January 10, 2018 Posted January 10, 2018 5 minutes ago, John Rostron said: The expression x*(w-x)/w/w varies from zero at 0 and 1, to 0.25 when half way. Unless I'm misreading it, that expression is equivalent to x*(w-x)/(w*w), which seems marginally less confusing than having two division operations in quick succession. Quote Alfred Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for Windows • Windows 10 Home/Pro Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for iPad • iPadOS 17.5.1 (iPad 7th gen)
John Rostron Posted January 10, 2018 Posted January 10, 2018 3 minutes ago, Alfred said: Unless I'm misreading it, that expression is equivalent to x*(w-x)/(w*w), which seems marginally less confusing than having two division operations in quick succession. Yes, /(w*w) might be marginally less confusing, but /w/w is quicker to type! Especially on a tablet. John Quote Windows 11, Affinity Photo 2.4.2 Designer 2.4.2 and Publisher 2.4.2 (mainly Photo). CPU: Intel Core i5 8500 @ 3.00GHz. RAM: 32.0GB DDR4 @ 1063MHz, Graphics: 2047MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
Alfred Posted January 10, 2018 Posted January 10, 2018 1 minute ago, John Rostron said: Yes, /(w*w) might be marginally less confusing, but /w/w is quicker to type! Especially on a tablet. John Fair point, especially with reference to tablets! John Rostron 1 Quote Alfred Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for Windows • Windows 10 Home/Pro Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for iPad • iPadOS 17.5.1 (iPad 7th gen)
firstdefence Posted January 10, 2018 Posted January 10, 2018 That equation just bends the text it doesn't arch the text? unless I'm missing something? Quote iMac 27" 2019 Sequoia 15.0 (24A335), iMac 27" Affinity Designer, Photo & Publisher V1 & V2, Adobe, Inkscape, Vectorstyler, Blender, C4D, Sketchup + more... XP-Pen Artist-22E, - iPad Pro 12.9 (Please refrain from licking the screen while using this forum) Affinity Help - Affinity Desktop Tutorials - Feedback - FAQ - most asked questions
carl123 Posted January 10, 2018 Posted January 10, 2018 44 minutes ago, John Rostron said: ....You would need to rasterize the text first. The Equation filter automatically rasterizes text so no need to do it first Quote To save time I am currently using an automated AI to reply to some posts on this forum. If any of "my" posts are wrong or appear to be total b*ll*cks they are the ones generated by the AI. If correct they were probably mine. I apologise for any mistakes made by my AI - I'm sure it will improve with time.
John Rostron Posted January 10, 2018 Posted January 10, 2018 1 hour ago, firstdefence said: That equation just bends the text it doesn't arch the text? unless I'm missing something? Yes, I think that it should be a y instead of h at the beginning. It will also depend on the proximity of the text/shape to the bottom line. I will have a further play. 51 minutes ago, carl123 said: The Equation filter automatically rasterizes text so no need to do it first Yes it does, but I always think it tends to get in the way. I prefer to rasterize it myself, especially if this was to be part of a macro. John Quote Windows 11, Affinity Photo 2.4.2 Designer 2.4.2 and Publisher 2.4.2 (mainly Photo). CPU: Intel Core i5 8500 @ 3.00GHz. RAM: 32.0GB DDR4 @ 1063MHz, Graphics: 2047MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
John Rostron Posted January 13, 2018 Posted January 13, 2018 @atfitzy. I thought that I had created a suitable filter using Distort > Equations, but ran into a problem. I have posted this separately here. Quote Windows 11, Affinity Photo 2.4.2 Designer 2.4.2 and Publisher 2.4.2 (mainly Photo). CPU: Intel Core i5 8500 @ 3.00GHz. RAM: 32.0GB DDR4 @ 1063MHz, Graphics: 2047MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
MikeW Posted January 13, 2018 Posted January 13, 2018 Using, or needing to use, formulas to do this task for a wing-it type of design process seems rather archaic. I'm sure it may be fun to some, but designs such as this are simply best to do in something that can at minimum have an envelope distort feature, export it, then bring it into AD if one desires. The below was made in another application (in less time than it took to start AD), and copy/pasted into AD. Mike Quote
John Rostron Posted January 13, 2018 Posted January 13, 2018 28 minutes ago, MikeW said: I'm sure it may be fun to some, Quite right! Would you deny me my simple pleasures? It is very much what you feel comfortable with. John Quote Windows 11, Affinity Photo 2.4.2 Designer 2.4.2 and Publisher 2.4.2 (mainly Photo). CPU: Intel Core i5 8500 @ 3.00GHz. RAM: 32.0GB DDR4 @ 1063MHz, Graphics: 2047MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
MikeW Posted January 13, 2018 Posted January 13, 2018 Knock yourself out. I'm the last person who would deny anyone taking pleasure in such endeavors. On my off time, I too do things that others would consider a colossal waste of time, I'm sure. But I generally don't do so to make a square peg fit a round whole. Oh, wait. I do that too in quite a literal sense: making pegs for pinning tenons in furniture... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.