Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] Γ—

Customer Feedback

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Member Title

Recent Profile Visitors

1,145 profile views
  1. πŸ™„ @GarryP @PΕ‘enda and many others in here. You guys are as usual just on routine autopilot with your thousands of responses. "Have you thought about that?" Nah. You haven't. I hope Serif thinks a bit more about such input from customers, and looks out at the market and the future. If you made the effort and gathered some knowledge, instead of ranting on here about things you don't understand, you would see a tremendous growth in collaboration features in many software genres, and of course it accelerated during covid lockdowns. If you had ever been on a large commercial project as a salaried employee - I can easily guess that you haven't - it's not about everyone being an editor or content provider - it's about being able to share, get input, directly at online meetings or electronically when the colleague, stakeholder or customer has time and much more. And that doesn't happen by sharing PDFs or other outdated nonsense. It happens online. Simultaneously or asynchronously. But that kind of thing is built around cloud services, and Serif has built their products around old Stone Age principles, and builds their business on tens of thousands of small savers, so they'll never ever get to that level, nor is that their plan. Haha, what the hell am I doing here anyway. I (we) are done evaluating Affinity, which is products for amateurs, private associations and tiny traders, but marketed as much more (it's not), while this forum is totally dominated by users whose hobby is to be on this forum. Get out a bit. You should have learned that much from covid lockdowns. And by the way, it's summer. Adieu. I and my colleagues are not going back, we have been so confirmed by the evaluation that we should not lower the bar. But it was a lot of fun to think that some cutting-edge, low-cost programs had been found. But it was just a bluff. Nicely wrapped up. Signing off, checking out, leaving the plimsoll: Eddie
  2. Many programs often check at the start, because the programmers and the companies have chosen the easy solution of a one-off check at the start. Because everyone else does. Then someone makes update checkers that run in the background all the time, because everyone else does. And then someone integrates all sorts of junk into these programs, e.g. cloud services, out of self-interest and uses it as a sales channel for all sorts of other things. I don't get the feeling that there are highly trained programmers specialising in optimisation and minimal programming developing these components. There is space junk. And then there's software junk. They have more in common than you think. But... The programmers and companies can design it however they want. Pretty much. And especially go smarter. That goes for emojis too; I've contacted The Unicode Consortium with strong recommendation to make an ashamed and guilty look emoticon. You'll need it! πŸ™‚
  3. Oh God no, not more programs and services starting with the OS and running in the background all the time please. It's a disease carried over from Windows, where you can have more icons in the System Tray than in a busy taskbar. In 2022 there must be a better way - doing this check from inside the programs while they run or using the OS scheduling service to run a check at whatever interval. If the program is not going to do anything important daily or even weekly, and will probably only have something to offer every few months, then there is no reason for it to run non-stop. And as I read it, StudioLink just needs to be in sync with major releases, not minor service releases.
  4. I can seriously recommend Serif to take it even more seriously. It was one thing that almost single-handedly plucked Affinity out of our evaluation. It's something that needs to be pro-actively investigated. systematically, persistently, thoroughly and patiently. We also experienced such errors - and quite a few others - some error dialogs were apparently erroneous, as the files could be saved and reopened anyway. But the pattern was clear, add real complexity to the documents, and then come the real problems. But such a persistent problem with data loss - regardless of whether the customer takes backup - no go. It worked better than cold washes with ice water here. "No thanks." We experienced several such failures on lightning-fast machines on the primary drive, which I don't think is an exotic configuration, so it was critical discovery, and it's a particularly critical failure. The applications as such are otherwise pleasantly bug-free (and thank you for that), but this... Psst to you out there. Never leave programs or files open for days or hours, unless the program is working on something or you are at the machine. Turn off when you leave. Turn it on when you come in the morning. Computers look cool on the surface, but you have no idea how much a reboot equals a good night's sleep after a long march.
  5. Yes, but it's just completely irrelevant in the above context and to what I'm writing. And look how it can now go off the rails. The point was that everything has a risk. Closing here.
  6. Obviously, we all know that, but the point of my post was that there is no guarantee of continuity whether you choose programs from e.g. Google (big), Serif (medium sized) or NumericPath (Vectorstyler, one dev).
  7. There are so many nuances to this. As a thumb rule, yes. In reality, not always. I've seen big and small programs disappear, ditto companies, or change terms so that even as a commercial you have to change vendors and software. And I'm not referring to Adobe. The IT world is volatile and dynamic. Serif also retired an entire product line including file format, and replaced it with a new one, developed at an impressively slow pace with years of delays and feature shortages. It's not a better alternative at all. Better assurance that THE COMPANY is there, but an eternity of waiting and uncertainty about what to expect. So you'll have to look around. In our professional and commercial evaluation, we did not include Vectorstyler. For several reasons. But if you are a hobbyist - and I think 98% of you are - I simply can't think of any reason other than money to advise against evaluating and buying Vectorstyler as a companion to Affinity, complementing in workflows blend or perspective, for example. As long as you are not dependent on the program and the program file format itself. Vectorstyler is absolutely insanely good feature-wise, and the programmer is clearly in a completely different league than Serif's devs. He is so talented. And clearly a genius at vector math. On top of that, bugs are fixed within weeks or few months worst case. I'm aware of all the weaknesses and uncertainties of the current program and one-man company, so we don't need that discussion here, thank you, but the program is impressive feature-wise, so in the overall picture assess how important it is to you to get something MADE and DELIVERED. That's what it's all about as a creative. You have to take a calculated risk sometimes. I'm personally going to keep an eye on Vectorstyler - it's a pleasure to follow something that evolves significantly from month to month. I know that as a company we won't be investing in Serif's programs for commercial use (probably never will), but I'll be keeping an eye on Serif as well, but here I can settle for dropping by annually - without any expectations. It was a strange experience that Affinity Designer in particular is a completely different program for a completely different audience than what the marketing and website are trying to bluff through. But I can understand that more artistic types are fond of the program. So am I for creative use. But I predict it will end up on the back burner once I finish my test creations. We as a company - and ambitious professionals - need somethingthat has mature vector features from top to bottom, and where the algorithms are professional and solid. That's why we're staying with Adobe, but it's been exciting to look around. There is clearly money to be made from the many talented hobbyists. But it's also their limited needs that drag down many small programs. Even those with the potential for more and bigger. But look at Vectorstyler - as the market stands now, it's clearly the cheapest of the feature-rich vector programs at a tolerable price. However, I think it's significantly much better in the macOS edition for M1. /Eddie
  8. Of course Photo should record the percentage in this case. It is after all the whole point of the operation. It's sloppy implementation. Similar action in Photoshop records what it should: The procedure, as always, should be: A) Gather data from customers and the market so you know use cases for functionality. Research competitors' products. B) Develop functionality. Not the other way around.
  9. Thx Old? Bruce πŸ™‚ There they are! Unfortunately, I had overlooked these. I need to slow down and be more thorough. πŸ™„ Thanks, I've assigned most of them shortcuts now. I also need to be able to mark several layers and mass rename, e.g. mark 10 layers and name them 'bricks', and other 10 and call them cement. Hair. Sky. Highlights. Reflection. Anything. Cheers
  10. I prefer shortcuts that make logical sense. And don't require an English keyboard; that's too 80s. When it comes to up, down, right and left, I re-assign to arrow keys, which somehow help me remember which combination of other keys to use. I'm disappointed, that there doesn't seem to be an option to similarly via a keyboard shortcut toggle the selection in the layers panel with the keyboard and select some layers - as in file managers. For example, it will help a lot when we create groups where the shortcut exists to create or release the group. When working with many, many, many layers, mouse or pen or whatever is far from always a fast tool. A shortcut for renaming layers? Yes please. You should be able to press Enter on macOS or F2 on Windows to rename a layer, which are the system keyboard shortcuts for these respective operating systems. And find rename in the context sensitive menu. These shortcuts work much better for me on macOS (where control + arrows are reserved for macOS):
  11. That issue really hurts often in Publisher and should have been fixed already.
  12. As I have written before, Serif seriously needs a serious forum for commercial use of Affinity, and also for very ambitious customers. As I have also written before, the forum is more like a political youth party forum than a customer forum. All the little useless emotion driven posts that do no good, just fill in with noise. And then you have obviously not understood the intentions of many of the posts here. Even though it is written in black and white. It is completely irrelevant to anyone but you that you are happy with the functionality of the program. Have you considered the idea that your needs may be smaller and even MUCH smaller than those of others? Nope, you sure haven't. You just have opinions. And in the midst of your unbridled need to share your own OPINIONS, you scare away those customers who have needs and input that can carry the programs forward from where they are today. You simply must learn to live with the fact that others disagree with you, and that others have substantially different needs than you. That's what we're writing here - not to you, but to Serif. And to make it visual. Here's the car you and users are happy with. A lot of us aren't:
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.