Jump to content

Fritz_H

Members
  • Content Count

    412
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About Fritz_H

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

1,087 profile views
  1. Sadly I can not see the issue you are describing - perhaps it would have helped drawing a circle around the correct and the wrong font-display. As far as I know, the Affinity-Application do not (yet) support variable fonts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_fonts Did you purchase the variable version by mistake?
  2. Well, an option that does not work is useless and may therefore be considered a bug.... to be fixed.
  3. so, what are these options good for? some more Usability-Nonsense?
  4. Hi, triggered by this posting: https://forum.affinity.serif.com/index.php?/topic/129579-affinity-all-never-purge-useless-data-at-saving/ I tried to see this issue myself: created an empty document, drew an empty picture frame, clicked on "replace image" and chose a JPG-file of about 11 MB and made sure that "EMBED Picture" is selected saved that Publisher-File and closed Publisher. The size of the Publisher-File (about 520KB) was, well: suprising. I renamed the JPG-File and opened the Publisher-File. Result: ???? Windows 8.1 Pro 64 Bit, german. Publisher: 1.8.5.703
  5. Perhaps there is some misunderstanding here: This changed application-behavior is only available in the most recent beta -> Serif can and will change features during the beta-phase (-stage); that is what it´s used for: check and change things (if necessary) .
  6. OK.. so tell me please: which problem does this change solve? What exactly improves by using ".JPEG" ?
  7. Nobody needs a checkbox in the Prefs for a feature nobody needs and nobody asked for. Just trash that stupid idea.
  8. I don´t see a single problem Serif solves by changing the default from .jpg to .jpeg but this change will for sure CAUSE problems and inconveniences. I ask Serif to quickly remove this nonsense and focus on fixing the real issues. ( like usability finally? ) Thanks.
  9. I think such an "export selected images to PDF" - Feature would perfectly suit into a DAM-Application...
  10. @mikeindevon You are right - I don´t know the UI-Design of Photoshop but Tabs like every modern WebBrowser offers, would be far more intuitive/useful.. (BTW: one of the many usability-issues of the Affinity-Products... <sigh> )
  11. Well, not referring to the main topic? I will take this as an answer, Thanks.
  12. ? "devalue" ? did not see it that way - Your answer just made me unsure (uncertain?) whether I could explain my idea properly/intelligibly...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please note the Annual Company Closure section in the Terms of Use. These are the Terms of Use you will be asked to agree to if you join the forum. | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.