Our response time is longer than usual currently. We're working to answer users as quickly as possible and thank you for your continued patience.
![](https://forum.affinity.serif.com/uploads/set_resources_8/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
ATP
Members-
Posts
146 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
ATP reacted to a post in a topic: How to Draw the BP Logo in Affinity Designer
-
ATP reacted to a post in a topic: How to Draw the BP Logo in Affinity Designer
-
ATP reacted to a post in a topic: Try Affinity Free For 6 Months
-
ATP reacted to a post in a topic: What to do if your Affinity document is corrupted or failing to open, with an error message shown?
-
Thinking of buying Photo V2
ATP replied to Dave.Kelly's topic in Affinity on Desktop Questions (macOS and Windows)
https://affinity.serif.com/en-gb/whats-new/version-2/ Every new feature Serif deemed important to point out is on this page, including all features in subsequent point releases. -
Alfred reacted to a post in a topic: I missed 50% off chance. Can I still get it?
-
ATP started following JPG not recognized , I missed 50% off chance. Can I still get it? , Publisher 2.5.2.2486 artefacts and 3 others
-
I missed 50% off chance. Can I still get it?
ATP replied to ZZzzZZ's topic in Customer Service, Accounts and Purchasing
It's your lucky day. -
Publisher 2.5.2.2486 artefacts
ATP replied to anto's topic in Other New Bugs and Issues in the Betas
My guess would be turning off hardware acceleration would fix it. Hopefully Serif will take care of the bug. -
Publisher 2.5.2.2486 artefacts
ATP replied to anto's topic in Other New Bugs and Issues in the Betas
Is hardware acceleration on or off? -
Petar Petrenko reacted to a post in a topic: AVIF Support Needed.
-
ATP reacted to a post in a topic: Offline activation
-
ATP reacted to a post in a topic: Offline activation
-
lardbros reacted to a post in a topic: Offline activation
-
lardbros reacted to a post in a topic: Offline activation
-
dcr reacted to a post in a topic: Offline activation
-
No internet required. They activate in a similar way to V1.
- 79 replies
-
- suggestions
- offline
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
ATP reacted to a post in a topic: 2.5.0 Beta Build 6 (2463) RC1
-
If you're buying business licenses, those can be activated offline. The minimum quantity is two. Not useful for consumers, but it works for businesses.
- 79 replies
-
- suggestions
- offline
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
ATP reacted to a post in a topic: Variable Font Support
-
ATP reacted to a post in a topic: Variable Font Support
-
ATP reacted to a post in a topic: QR Code Tool
-
AK_CCM reacted to a post in a topic: QR Code Tool
-
A pop-up dialog is essential for the feature to be used by more casual users. I could easily see frustration with the current implementation.
-
Great addition! If the library has the feature, the option of Aztec code generation would be great too, though more niche.
-
ronnyb reacted to a post in a topic: Move data entry
-
TihoS reacted to a post in a topic: Offline activation
-
TihoS reacted to a post in a topic: Offline activation
-
TihoS reacted to a post in a topic: Offline activation
-
It would be great if Serif could add some transparency of the encoders used, versions and the equivalent parameters for the encoder libraries. Give us a scale in the documentation or similar, so we could check with the encoder library to more precisely tune our final output quality. Currently the quality slider exposed in the export interface isn't directly comparable to anything from the encoders used, this makes it difficult to ensure similar quality when exporting across multiple applications. Some background for the request. JPEG XL is supported in Affinity 2, but nowhere is it documented what library, which version, what effort settings or what quality/distance equivalent the quality slider in AFP corresponds to. This information could be hugely useful when more precise control of final output quality is desired, and not only for JPEG XL but all export formats supported. *There's no third-party notice for anything to do with JPEG XL.
-
+1 Complete support from me too. There's a lossless option with WebP, so we should definitely get the option with JPEG XL too. The latest libjxl version has a 10x improvement in memory usage and greatly increased speed. I could suspect the high memory usage was a reason to not support the lossless option, but that worry is now in the past. The same is true for the lossy mode, though not important for this topic. This newly released article has an overview of the improvements and some comparisons to other formats. I highly recommend checking it out.
-
Move data entry
ATP replied to Ash's topic in [ARCHIVE] 2.4, 2.3, 2.2 & 2.1 Features and Improvements
Is there really no UI option to open this dialog, only a keyboard shortcut? -
I want to pop in here and ask, are people happy with how Affinity Photo handles RAW photos? My old copy of Lightroom handles RAW pictures a lot better, so much so that I never use Affinity Photo for anything RAW. Their RAW processing needs to become a lot better if they create a Lightroom competitor.
-
Measurement Tool
ATP replied to Chris Wood's topic in Feedback for the Affinity V2 Suite of Products
Could it also be possible to get a dynamic area tool? Where we can drag a shape directly with the tool, to get quick measurements? This is possible! Simply drag a shape with the shape tool, it will show you the height and width in your set scale. Of course in addition to the main feature request which is permanent measure/area layers/objects. -
Can you make the same behavior happen with any other file?
-
Did you export as JPEG XL in Affinity Photo 2? JPEG and JPEG XL are not the same format. JPEG XL is a new format which currently isn't widely supported.