Suggest you increase price and boost development

[amandas]

Hi,

As the title suggests. I am a fan of your software, it has good architecture and is capable of besting Adobe products in long run, only I feel the the development is too slow. I don't mind paying twice the current price for each of your products - maybe a poll among the users about that?

 

Best

[Aammppaa]

People's votes are a little contentious in the UK right now. 

[Jowday]

[Michael Naylor]

I appreciate your honesty, Jowday.  Their broken promises for a DAM over many years has really pissed me off.  I'm back with Adobe.

[mrtymcln]

I'd happily pay more ($80 per app, $63 on sale is still cheaper than Adobe) if it meant Serif could develop their DAM quicker. I'd also suggest: prioritising a desktop DAM over a tablet Publisher–desktop publishing is better done on a desktop.

[gm10]

don't mind paying twice the current price for each of your products

Or keep the price the same, but add subscription option for separate products and the entire suit. Personally, I am still on the fence. When/if Serif adds a web builder, I'd buy the web builder and Publisher immediately, maybe photo as well. If office subscription is available by that time, I'd rather buy the entire suite subscription.

[RowdyMonkey]

For anyone who works on both Windows and Mac, the price is already effectively double.  The whole suite for both platforms is currently just short of £300, so doubling the cost of each product on each platform would take it close to £600.  I think many individuals and small businesses would have to think carefully about that, particularly if paid upgrades were to become more frequent.

[Distill7]

You have to understand that they're a small company, they don't have many developers. Even if they increase prices, it won't lead to boosted development.

What I also think is that they might be delaying some features for version 2.0, so just be patient a little bit.