Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I stopped using Affinity Photo for processing raw files from my Canon R6, as the white balance and tint were completely different from as shot. Does version 2 address this problem?

Posted

Got a raw file we can check for you?

iMac 27" 2019 Sequoia 15.0 (24A335), iMac 27" Affinity Designer, Photo & Publisher V1 & V2, Adobe, Inkscape, Vectorstyler, Blender, C4D, Sketchup + more... XP-Pen Artist-22E, - iPad Pro 12.9  
B| (Please refrain from licking the screen while using this forum)

Affinity Help - Affinity Desktop Tutorials - Feedback - FAQ - most asked questions

Posted

Thank you for your reply. This was taken yesterday, when I open this in Affinity Photo, this comes up with a white balance of 4410k and a magenta tint of 35%. When I open this in Canon DPP the white balance shows as 5200k. 

_N5A7237.CR3

Posted

FWIW, here's what it shows in the raw editors I have installed (beautiful buck, by the way):

darktable 4.1 - image.png.65cbdb76759848d6086bd06d30287624.png

RawTherapee 5.9 - image.png.e07d9c0d7a7d66fb6de52c9eed93291d.png

ART 1.16.4 - image.png.50c5773f721198375a5c1e372fa6281b.png

DPP 4.16 - image.png.0eb4a6deed9ac7a51252974e48a6711e.png

Affinity Photo 1 - image.png.17e48aa8ce91542a36eaf0cb02b56e47.png

Affinity Photo 2 - image.png.43fc17f9afc5644a4096e8bf3dd4166a.png

Len
Affinity Photo 2 | QCAD 3 | FastStone | SpyderX Pro | FOSS:  ART darktable  XnView  RawTherapee  Inkscape  G'MIC  LibreOffice
Windows 11 on a 16 GB, Ryzen 5700 8-core laptop with a cheesy little embedded AMD GPU

Canon T8i / 850D | Canon EF 24-70mm F4L IS USM | Canon EF 70-200mm F4 L USM | Rikenon P 50mm f/1.7 | K&F Concept Nano-X filters
...desperately looking for landscapes in Nolandscapeland        Flickr

Posted

Thank you for your reply, I don't understand why Affinity does this. I reported it on version 1 and was hoping it was going to be fixed in this version, but it would appear not.

Posted

IMO the Develop persona in Photo is more or less a "me too!" thing at this point. Yes, it processes raw images but there are far more powerful (and free) alternatives out there. I've tried it a bit but don't see myself moving to it for raw processing except maybe in a pinch. Hopefully they'll continue to develop it (no pun intended) into something competitive but at this point I don't think it's "there". The Photo persona is why I bought the app.

Len
Affinity Photo 2 | QCAD 3 | FastStone | SpyderX Pro | FOSS:  ART darktable  XnView  RawTherapee  Inkscape  G'MIC  LibreOffice
Windows 11 on a 16 GB, Ryzen 5700 8-core laptop with a cheesy little embedded AMD GPU

Canon T8i / 850D | Canon EF 24-70mm F4L IS USM | Canon EF 70-200mm F4 L USM | Rikenon P 50mm f/1.7 | K&F Concept Nano-X filters
...desperately looking for landscapes in Nolandscapeland        Flickr

  • 2 months later...
  • Staff
Posted

Sorry that you have experienced this problem with the Affinity Suite. 

We have now released 2.0.4 on all platforms, and using that build we believe this problem no longer occurs.

Patrick Connor
Serif Europe Ltd

"There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man. True nobility lies in being superior to your previous self."  W. L. Sheldon

 

  • 1 year later...
Posted

@A.2001 I downloaded @PaulG09's CR3 file (earlier in this thread) and opened it in AP v2.5.7 (Mac M4, running Sequoia). It opens in the Develop Persona with a WB of 5269 and a Tint of -2. To my eyes, that looked WAY too yellow, but those numbers seemed to be fairly close to what @lphilpot saw in other RAW processors. The image was also tonally flat, so I boosted the Exposure to +1 stop and the Blacks to +10, just as a starting point. 

Different RAW processors don't look the same, even if you use the exact same WB/Tint numbers in each one. They all apply their own default recipes (or defaults you set), such as contrast, tone curve, saturation, custom camera profile settings, sharpening, etc. By default, Affinity doesn't apply much of anything. When I opened this RAW image in the Develop Persona, it reported the above numbers and was flat and yellow. If I click the "up arrow" in the White Balance Panel immediately after opening the file (per the screenshot below) it appears I get what the Develop Persona sees as the "correct As Shot WB". The "WB numbers" certainly don't agree with the other processors, but it looked much more natural. That changed the WB to the low 4000K range. If you mess with the sliders first, it no longer gives you that As Shot WB, at least for me...it just moves the WB by set amounts A WB of around 4000K to 4400K looks a lot better to me. Perhaps 4200K in Affinity Develop Persona is somewhat equivalent to 5200K in Canon DPP or another app, at least according to the LIB-RAW color module used in Affinity. I find I have to adjust WB on nearly every image in the Develop Persona, or if I have a known neutral, I can use the WB color picker. 

Not as full featured, for sure, but I find I can get very good results with it nonetheless. I like the ability to use RAW Layer (Linked), which keeps my AfPhoto file sizes small, so I use the Develop Persona a lot. It could be a lot better and more full featured. I hope something here makes sense and is helpful. If not, I'd use a different RAW processor. Canon DPP is made for CR3 files, so I'm sure it will give better results right off the bat. 

Screenshot2024-12-17at11_56_13AM.jpg.87f2cc9aae2daefb6d1e8b534b53c793.jpg

2024 MacBook Pro M4 Max, 48GB, 1TB SSD, Sequoia OS, Affinity Photo/Designer/Publisher v1 & v2, Adobe CS6 Extended, LightRoom v6, Blender, InkScape, Dell 30" Monitor, Canon PRO-100 Printer, i1 Spectrophotometer, i1Publish, Wacom Intuos 4 PTK-640 graphics tablet

Posted

BTW, the attached JPG (sRGB, downsized to 1600 px. JPG Quality 80) was processed from the CR3 file provided (nice photo of that buck, by the way). I used 3800K and +2 Tint in the Affinity Develop Persona, and at least to my eyes, the color looks about right. 5200K was WAY too yellow, IMO (at least when using Affinity Develop Persona). FWIW.

 

_N5A7237.jpg

2024 MacBook Pro M4 Max, 48GB, 1TB SSD, Sequoia OS, Affinity Photo/Designer/Publisher v1 & v2, Adobe CS6 Extended, LightRoom v6, Blender, InkScape, Dell 30" Monitor, Canon PRO-100 Printer, i1 Spectrophotometer, i1Publish, Wacom Intuos 4 PTK-640 graphics tablet

Posted
8 hours ago, A.2001 said:

Affinity changes my WB, TINT and FOCUS or SHAPE

Compared to what? It is normal that each RAW developer applies some kind of preset to a RAW file when loaded. To get a "neutral" view you should load the RAW file in a Viewer thats just displays the RAW values, e.g. FastRawViewer. All other viewers, like Faststone, XnView... just show the embedded and higly developed jpg preview.

You may want to upload one of your RAW files to show the differences.

Regards,
Otto

Affinity Suite v2.6.x - Windows 11 Pro

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.