Jump to content

loukash

Members
  • Posts

    6,499
  • Joined

Posts posted by loukash

  1. 1 hour ago, Viktor CR said:

    How do you have one layer or image spread over multiple Artboards and stay in place consistently, whether you move Artboards or reposition the image?

    So many possibilities… especially since using Designer Artboards used to be the actual workaround for the lack of multipage spreads in Publisher. ;)
    For example here:

    ^ It's a long thread so there are likely more examples that me and others have posted.

    Or here's something:

    But if you need to know more, please post a separate thread or join an existing one on that very topic.

  2. On 10/31/2024 at 5:23 AM, Viktor CR said:

    I can imagine artists wanting to be able to eventually produce all sorts of tiled designs, that can effortlessly be output as print ready PDF.

    1 hour ago, Petar Petrenko said:

    I think it will be well suited for Designer.

    Yep, this is exactly what you may want to use Designer for all along. Artboards can be of any shape, size and position. They can be even nested or overlapping.
    Just set up your tiled design with Artboards in Designer (persona or app) first, then move over to Publisher to use its advanced typography features if needed. 

  3. 46 minutes ago, Patrick Connor said:

    Can you explain whether you mean

    (a) "it is a step back" us not (yet) implementing a way to access the earlier behaviour on mac to match Windows

    or

    (b) it is "a step back" that it applies to your selection instantly?

    Both.
    I, for one, like the current behavior, and I like to have options.

    23 minutes ago, Sean P said:

    There is an open issue that is preventing that part working on macOS and iPad. It is logged and intended to be fixed (which is why it was phrased with currently). 

    Ah, thanks.

  4. 1 hour ago, JoJu said:

    they have high resolution screens

    That includes my trusty old pre-Retina MBP 2008 as well. In fact, my ambivalent relationship with Arial goes as far back as a purple iMac DV 400, back in 2000… ;) 

    1 hour ago, JoJu said:

    35 years working with computers

    Yeah, same here. For example, my main computer 1994–1998 was my then-flatmate's PowerBook 140 with a monochrome display and a whopping 40 MB hard drive. It could run PageMaker 4 though, so I was happy with it.

    1 hour ago, JoJu said:

    the definition of "easily readable" does not contain 9 pt text-sizes

    It depends on the glasses: :27_sunglasses:
    For reading and for computer work, currently I've recycled the spectacles I was wearing when I was like 12-13, i.e. 45 years ago. (I replaced the frames, of course…) They just work nicely for distances around 50–70 cm. 

    1 hour ago, JoJu said:

    your use case

    I've posted this screenshot a few years ago in another context on this forum, but here it is, Arial in one of my FM databases in action:

    fm_project_time_tracking.png.10b4e700e364d60da63494a8a1d6d59f.png

    With Helvetica – or any other sans serif font for that matter – it just didn't work for me the way I wanted it.
    The core of this database is over 25 years old. In fact, one of my archived early versions was created on 19 August 1999…

    ~~~

    Back on topic:

    Hey, it could have been worse!

    Comic Sans, anyone? :D 

  5. Speaking of Arial, it can cause me literally physical pain when I'm looking at it printed on paper.
    And boy, was I angry when one of my former clients decided to change their corporate identity and forced me to use Georgia (which is alright) and Arial (ouch!) for the brochures I laid out for them, replacing Helvetica Neue.

    But…

    There are instances when Arial is hard to beat in terms of readability, and that's when it's used at small sizes on a computer display. After all, essentially that's what it was originally designed and optimized for. For example, I do some FileMaker programming every now and then: Arial 9pt is perfect for UI labels, and Arial 11pt for text fields, easily readable on any of my 15" MacBooks. And yes, of course at first I tried Helvetica et al; Arial just works better in those situations, no matter how hard I tried…

  6. 2 hours ago, JoJu said:

    just noticed a couple of times, it's not always opening up the symbols panel and I can't see why at the moment.

    I don't remember the default MacOS keyboard shortcut for "Emoji & Symbols" as I usually modify many of those shortcuts anyway (hey, my muscle memory goes as far back as System 7 and I don't like to change my habits all too often… ;))  But it could be that an Affinity shortcut conflicts with it, and overrides it.

  7. 55 minutes ago, MikeTO said:

    You can add your own text replacements to Affinity using Settings > AutoCorrect.

    Yes, but that's in APu only.

    1 hour ago, MikeTO said:

    Your macOS text replacements will work in Affinity text fields

    Exactly, at least in those that are apparently based on NSText.
    In Photo, you can e.g. use a field in the Metadata panel to temporarily input the shortcuts, then copy & paste into a text frame.

  8. 23 minutes ago, JoJu said:

    in no Affinity app?

    Probably because Affinity text frames don't utilize Apple's NSText framework. Which they can't because otherwise they wouldn't be compatible with the Windows versions.
    It works with third party text expanders, however. Keyboard Maestro can do it, among many others.

  9. 10 hours ago, Chills said:

    However,  starting where we are the discussion changed to a Light-Bridge DAM that is needed because user of all three Affinity apps will have a vast amount of assets to manage. (this is why Bridge was standard will any CS app)

    Ah, I should have read on before replying above… :D 
    You're actually confirming what I just said.
    Cheers! :) 

  10. 10 hours ago, Chills said:

    the missing link in the Affinity suite

    … is not "missing". It's literally called StudioLink.

    10 hours ago, Chills said:

    Something that ties the other three apps together (which is why Adobe did LR in the first place)

    Um, nope. What actually ties Adobe apps together is Bridge.
    I, for one, couldn't care less about Lightroom. I'm a designer, not a photographer.

    Much like I, for one, couldn't care less about an "Affinity Lighttable" (or whatever it would be called).
    Affinity is a graphic design suite, not a photo editing suite, hence the "missing link" it needs is something like Bridge or iView/Expression Media.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.