lbohen Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 I made an image smaller with Photo 2.5.4. The original image was very clear and 3102 x 1744 px at 144 DPI. When resizing to 200 x 112.4 px at 72 DPI the resulting image was blurry. See the attached smaller image. Why would the image quality degrade? How to prevent the image quality from degrading? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ldina Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 Well, your original image has 5,409,888 pixels. Your downsized image has 22,480 pixels. So you are discarding 99.6% of all your pixels and the program is doing its best to preserve the quality with whatever resampling method you choose. Exporting has the same issues. That's a massive size change. If you start with a pixel based image, you can try downsampling in incremental steps and see if that helps, e.g., downsize by 50%, then again, etc, until you reach your desired size. Try different resampling algorithms....bilinear, bicubic, etc. If you notices a loss of quality in any of your steps along the way, you can try re sharpening before continuing to the next step. No guarantees. Ideally, you'd want to create this job using vectors instead of pixels, especially since it is such a simple design. Then you can export to whatever size you want without any loss in quality. Quote 2017 15" MacBook Pro, 16 MB RAM, Ventura v13.7, Affinity Photo/Designer/Publisher v1 & v2, Adobe CS6 Extended, LightRoom v6, Blender, InkScape, Dell 30" Monitor, Canon PRO-100 Printer, i1 Spectrophotometer, i1Publish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Bruce Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 51 minutes ago, lbohen said: I made an image smaller with Photo 2.5.4. The original image was very clear and 3102 x 1744 px at 144 DPI. When resizing to 200 x 112.4 px at 72 DPI the resulting image was blurry. See the attached smaller image. Why would the image quality degrade? How to prevent the image quality from degrading? I assume that the original is all vector work. Photo shows things as if they had been rendered down to Pixels. As @Ldina has pointed out the design is now only a tiny fraction of the original area. I would open the .afphoto in Designer, if you have it, and if the smaller image is still a vector only .afphoto document. Designer shows vectors as vectors, Photo shows vectors with a pixel view. Quote Mac Pro (Late 2013) Mac OS 12.7.6 Affinity Designer 2.5.5 | Affinity Photo 2.5.5 | Affinity Publisher 2.5.5 | Beta versions as they appear. I have never mastered color management, period, so I cannot help with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pšenda Posted August 30 Share Posted August 30 13 hours ago, lbohen said: Why would the image quality degrade? Why would the image quality degrade when the resolution is reduced? - try to answer yourself how quality and detailed a 1x1 pixel image will be. 13 hours ago, lbohen said: When resizing to 200 x 112.4 px Since pixels cannot be divided into smaller parts, the dimension you specify will always be rounded to whole pixels. However, this will change the aspect ratio of the new image, which must be recalculated, resulting in further degradation of image quality. R C-R 1 Quote Affinity Store (MSI/EXE): Affinity Suite (ADe, APh, APu) 2.4.0.2301 Dell OptiPlex 7060, i5-8500 3.00 GHz, 16 GB, Intel UHD Graphics 630, Dell P2417H 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 23H2, Build 22631.3155. Dell Latitude E5570, i5-6440HQ 2.60 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics 530, 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 23H2, Build 22631.3155. Intel NUC5PGYH, Pentium N3700 2.40 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics, EIZO EV2456 1920 x 1200, Windows 10 Pro, Version 21H1, Build 19043.2130. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.