Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have searched for this but can't find an answer:

In a document with cables - say mains cables, signal cables, network cables etc. each is represented by a simple stroke with a width and colour.

The cables are all in different groups - some are straight lines, some are (variously) curved. If I want to change the weight of all signal cables, for example, change all the red 1pt lines to purple 2pt.

changing style of multiple items.png

If I use a 'style' I can't work out how to edit the style to change all the objects with that style.

If I use a symbol, they all have to be the same shape.

I don't want all the cables of a type in the same group so how do I go about changing the colour / width of related objects in different groups together in a controlled way?

Posted

In the menu Selection, you can choose "same stroke width" or "same stroke color". 

Affinity Suite 2.5 – Monterey 12.7.5 – MacBookPro 14" 2021 M1 Pro 16Go/1To

I apologise for any approximations in my English. It is not my mother tongue.

Posted

Yes, @Oufti, but that also changes objects which have the same stroke width and colour which don't have that meaning. If you change it to a colour and width that is used somewhere else, you can no longer differentiate between the wanted objects and the ones that were previously that colour and width.

I have currently gone through and changed the name of all the 'signal cables' to the same name and then I can select them by name. It works but prevents me from giving them the names that make more sense.

Posted

I have now tried that and it works, @bbrother; I didn't realise what the tags were for, so thank you.

It's not as useful as being able to redefine a named style and have it affect all layers associated with that style, which is what I was hoping to find, but it appears to be the best option if you can manage with only a few tags.

Posted
35 minutes ago, Magicbean said:

It's not as useful as being able to redefine a named style and have it affect all layers associated with that style

I agree with that👍. There should be a true object styles feature that would allow to do this. 

Posted

Thanks @Return,

That's another useful way to make selections of objects across layers; it looks as though there are quite a lot of options for doing this. But more useful still if I could change the definition of a style and have it affect all the objects that used that style. I think I could do this in Aldus (and then Macromedia) Freehand over 30 years ago - it was incredibly useful and much easier!

But thank you for the reminder about states and queries - that was useful!

Posted
13 minutes ago, Magicbean said:

I think I could do this in Aldus (and then Macromedia) Freehand over 30 years ago - it was incredibly useful and much easier!

I hear you!
My FH9 still runs in the SheepShaver OS 9 emulation… :D 

 

 

MacBookAir 15": MacOS Sonoma > Affinity v1, v2, v2 beta // MacBookPro 15" mid-2012: MacOS El Capitan > Affinity v1 / MacOS Catalina > Affinity v1, v2, v2 beta // iPad 8th: iPadOS 18 > Affinity v2

Posted

Global Styles would be a great feature request/upgrade, similar to regular vs global colors…

2021 16” Macbook Pro w/ M1 Max 10c cpu /24c gpu, 32 GB RAM, 1TB SSD, macOS Sequoia 15.1

2018 11" iPad Pro w/ A12X cpu/gpu, 256 GB, iPadOS 18.1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.