Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Content Overlay (Layer FX) - Less need to make Symbols!


Recommended Posts

Hi,

I've made this request before, but I'll make it again briefly because I think it's important.

Why is there no 'Content Overlay' FX, like there is a Color Overlay and a Gradient Overlay.

With Content Overal FX you overlay the content over itself, with a different blend mode for example, and opacity, maybe some transform/offset controls.
This way you can mix blend modes without making Symbols all the time.

What do you think?
Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/12/2020 at 10:11 AM, OdFori said:

'Content Overlay' FX

Is it possible to give an example of what this function should do? I somehow did not understand it from the description.

Affinity Store (MSI/EXE): Affinity Suite (ADe, APh, APu) 2.4.0.2301
Dell OptiPlex 7060, i5-8500 3.00 GHz, 16 GB, Intel UHD Graphics 630, Dell P2417H 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 23H2, Build 22631.3155.
Dell Latitude E5570, i5-6440HQ 2.60 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics 530, 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 23H2, Build 22631.3155.
Intel NUC5PGYH, Pentium N3700 2.40 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics, EIZO EV2456 1920 x 1200, Windows 10 Pro, Version 21H1, Build 19043.2130.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/12/2020 at 10:11 AM, OdFori said:

I've made this request before, but I'll make it again briefly because I think it's important. Why is there no 'Content Overlay' FX, like there is a Color Overlay and a Gradient Overlay.

With Content Overlay FX you overlay the content over itself, with a different blend mode for example, and opacity, maybe some transform/offset controls. This way you can mix blend modes without making Symbols all the time.

What do you think?

For several uses I think it is a good idea - fx for classic manipulations in Photo but probably many others.

  • "The user interface is supposed to work for me - I am not supposed to work for the user interface."
  • Computer-, operating system- and software agnostic; I am a result oriented professional. Look for a fanboy somewhere else.
  • “When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger.” ― Confucius
  • Not an Affinity user og forum user anymore. The software continued to disappoint and not deliver.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/12/2020 at 4:11 AM, OdFori said:

With Content Overal FX you overlay the content over itself, with a different blend mode for example, and opacity, maybe some transform/offset controls.

Couldn't you just duplicate it, and change the blend mode or opacity of the duplicate?

-- Walt
Designer, Photo, and Publisher V1 and V2 at latest retail and beta releases
PC:
    Desktop:  Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 64GB memory, AMD Ryzen 9 5900 12-Core @ 3.00 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 

    Laptop:  Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 32GB memory, Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz, Intel UHD Graphics Comet Lake GT2 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU.
    Laptop 2: Windows 11 Pro 24H2,  16GB memory, Snapdragon(R) X Elite - X1E80100 - Qualcomm(R) Oryon(TM) 12 Core CPU 4.01 GHz, Qualcomm(R) Adreno(TM) X1-85 GPU
iPad:  iPad Pro M1, 12.9": iPadOS 17.7, Apple Pencil 2, Magic Keyboard 
Mac:  2023 M2 MacBook Air 15", 16GB memory, macOS Sonoma 14.7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/12/2020 at 9:11 AM, OdFori said:

With Content Overal [sic] FX you overlay the content over itself, with a different blend mode for example, and opacity, maybe some transform/offset controls. This way you can mix blend modes without making Symbols all the time.

Workaround when you don't need transforms: simply nest a non-adjusting Levels (or some other) Adjustment with the required blend mode and opacity in the object. (Of course, actually using the Adjustment's controls and/or masking the Adjustment provides even more opportunities.) Please actually try this if you are tempted to assume it won't work.

When you do need a transform, ask, "Why on earth is there no live version of the Affine filter or the Equations filter?"  and then you could try messing around with the Live Perspective Filter for non-destructive transforms that can be given any blend mode and/or opacity. Careful, though, that live filter easily crashes the app.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, walt.farrell said:

Couldn't you just duplicate it, and change the blend mode or opacity of the duplicate?

Haha Walt, u oldskool right? Appreciate that.
I like to set up rough structures/compositions which I would like to improve incrementally with having to redo as little as possible while going into the details. 

14 hours ago, anon2 said:

Workaround when you don't need transforms: simply nest a non-adjusting Levels (or some other) Adjustment with the required blend mode and opacity in the object. (Of course, actually using the Adjustment's controls and/or masking the Adjustment provides even more opportunities.) Please actually try this if you are tempted to assume it won't work.

When you do need a transform, ask, "Why on earth is there no live version of the Affine filter or the Equations filter?"  and then you could try messing around with the Live Perspective Filter for non-destructive transforms that can be given any blend mode and/or opacity. Careful, though, that live filter easily crashes the app.

That's a great tip Anon,
It doesn't seem to exactly reproduce the same result as 'duplicating the layer/making a blendmode-varianced symbol of it on top', at least not in the way I tried it (regardless of changing the scope of the filter), I do not understand why, but I guess that's OK; this is no math we're doing here, that gives a lot of flexibility and freedom to try things out, without making symbols. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, OdFori said:

It doesn't seem to exactly reproduce the same result as 'duplicating the layer/making a blendmode-varianced symbol of it on top', at least not in the way I tried it (regardless of changing the scope of the filter)

I have a suspicion of what may be happening in your test document since you are using Symbols, but please attach the document or a link to a download of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/14/2020 at 6:42 PM, anon2 said:

I have a suspicion of what may be happening in your test document since you are using Symbols, but please attach the document or a link to a download of it.

I did the test with picture frames and test images. Trying to mix the 'Lighten' with a 'Linear Light' on top with 58% opacity. Here's the sample file.

The first is copying the layer, and then two different tries with the adjustment layer method. The middle one fails I think because the scope of the 'Lighten' does not hit to the background.

 

iu-2.jpeg

iu.jpeg

didtestagain.afpub

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see your layering and blending structures are far more complex than just an image blended with itself. Each of your examples features three framed images, each image blending with its containing frame and then frames being blended with frames.

The blending operations are non-commutative. For example, the following two lines are not equivalent

A linearLight (A lighten B)

(A linearLight A) lighten B
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.