Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

John Rostron

Members
  • Posts

    3,510
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by John Rostron

  1. On 4/23/2024 at 5:23 PM, j3rry said:

    I tried a few macros Walt mentioned in the link. But nothing worked. I have my macro overworked but without the option " maintain ratio " it will not work. So I gave up ....

    This comes near but it was not possible to set to a pixel size only percent ...

    Could you clarify how you want your image resized? My macros work on absolute pixel sizes not percents. I could create a modified version if you tell me exactly what you want.

    John

     

  2. 18 hours ago, nickbatz said:

    ...because the screen resolution is what counts.

    But resampling while you resize sharpens the image, and - correct me if I'm wrong - it never creates artifacts.

    An appropriate downsizing algorithm would probably sharpen an image. However, I would be reluctant to claim that it never created artefacts.

    If you are upsizing, then it is much more dependant on the kind of image - and on the algorithm. It  would also be more likely to cause artefacts because it has to create pixels which were not there before. Having said that, modern specialized upsizing software can do amazing things.

    John

  3. I have been recording macros to change the dpi of an image without changing the physical size. These macros will not work in the current versions of Photo, but did work in version 1.6. I originally had a copy of the installation file for v1.6, but this was one of the casualties of me transferring to a new computer. I still have a licence for version 1, but I am told that version 1.6 is no longer available. Would it be possible to obtain a copy of the v1.6 installation files. The macros I originally recorded in v1.6 still work, but some users would like versions that create a different dpi to those I already provide.

    John Rostron

  4. Yes, impressive. The depth of field is narrow, but most is in foocus, notably the brakes on the antennae.

    What is it? I could probably work out what it is from my key (written by my old boss), but I would guess something like a male common mosquito Culex pipiens.

    John

  5. 14 hours ago, JIPJIP said:

    Hi,

    I don't know if there is a more recent topic about this subject.

    Is there now (2024) a way to resize an image AND specify the method (bilinear, bicubic, etc ..;) in a macro ?


    Thanx

    You can specify the resampling algorithm using Document > Resize in a macro, but the saved macro always uses the original image propeties when running, not those of the image you apply it to.

    Using Equations avoids this problem, but you cannot specify the resampling algorthm.

    John

  6. Whilst in nitpicking mode, can I point out that scientific names have only the first word (the generic name) capitalised. The remaining words are all lower case. For example Homo erectus pekinensis.

    The central skull should be named  Homo habilis, not Homo habitus.

    A very nice poster!

    John

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.