Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About billtils

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    UK with frequent visits to family in Australia and USA
  • Interests
    Photography ("Serious hobby" level); Cooking

Recent Profile Visitors

674 profile views
  1. billtils

    Plugins 1.7

    Or even if it did work, Earlio. I have DxO PhotoLab and it's the biggest waste of money I have ever spent on editing software. There's nothing in it that I use and can't do with AP and the original free NIK collection.
  2. billtils


    I'm not complaining about or criticising what Serif have done in the last 3 or 4 years, with AP or with the other lines, but I would have been happier if they had just said when this was first discussed that a DAM was of interest but not a priority. The moment has passed.
  3. billtils


    That could be anything from 13 to 25 months from now. It's almost certainly already too late for me and in that time frame "almost" can be deleted. Could attract others though.
  4. billtils


    It's been "wait until next year" since day 1. I can understand that Serif devoted resources to other developments such as the iThingy version for sound commercial reasons, but would have preferred that they just drop the DAM and be done - and let us know that's where things are.
  5. I haven't posted much here for a while as the current MAS version meets my editing needs quite nicely - thanks to all for your great work. However, it seems like a lifetime ago that we were assured that a DAM was coming. Is this still the case or has it been dropped?
  6. Just curious about what is meant by "Gradient mask" here and how people use the AP version. There is a gradient mask tool in CaptureOne that I use a lot. It draws a gradient (obviously :rolleyes: ) by selecting a start point and then dragging to the desired end point. You can then apply any of the C1 editing tools to that segment of your image, I don't see that flexibility in the AP version (and yes, I will be 0.001% amazed if the issue is my understanding rather than the capability of the tool in AP).
  7. @R C-R Actually this is a Mac site (Affinity Photo on Mac Beta). It is AP that is now not Mac only, but there is a separate forum for the Windows version. I suppose if we go up a level, you would be correct that Affinity Beta Support in itself is not platform specific. However, there would not be much point in posting advice that involved the possible use of Apple Photos on the other Forum ;) .
  8. Ash, there are just two things that matter here: Firstly at present AP is an editing program (and a very, very good one) but does not have a library/Digital Asset Manager function; secondly there are many other programs that do work (and work well) in regard to the library function and can call AP as an external editor. Bottom line is if you have Apple Photos or any version of Lightroom (as examples - I don't use either of these, but this is a Mac site and if you have a Mac you have Photos free of charge and it seems you may have an older non-subscription version of LR) then go ahead and use that as your DAM and call AP for editing.
  9. That only applies to large enterprise installations. Single/small business users are another matter altogether. And my beef as a single user is the current price up/value for money down trend.
  10. Mike (and fde 101 and Traveling Man and lots of others ...) see post #17 above from vague-logic. That's the workflow that I use (as does at least one other significant contributor here) and it works very well indeed. Why not download the free trial and give it a run? The DAM is very flexible; it will work with referenced or managed libraries and can structure your files in a multi-layer folder system and/or by keywords. I was an early moaner about the lack of a DAM, but the ease of calling AP as external editor from CaptureOne means I have lost interest in that aspect. As an aside, I think that the prioritisation mentioned by Andy in post #19 makes a lot of sense. If I were to change anything in my personal set-up in the mid-term future it would be to move to a Windows platform as Apple seemingly relentlessly and blindly keep introducing new Macs that have fewer features of interest (no SD card reader, no magsafe power cord, 16GB max RAM on the latest MacBookPro) but a big jump in price. I'll take a serious look at the W version of AP when it is released.
  11. amazme1, what you say about LR being "the one exception" is not correct. Capture One Pro and ACDSee, to name but two, can do this (DAM + photo editor).
  12. At some point the use of [ and ] to change/select brush size stopped working in AP, but it only happens with some functions. It is OK in Quick Mask and in Blemish Removal - but curiously not in Inpainting or Healing ...
  13. Won't you get what you need using File > New and selecting Web from the dropdown? If the main issue is removing the EXIF data you can do it like this.
  14. billtils

    Erwerbt Aperture von Apple

    csp, I totally agree - in principle at any rate! But - and it's a BIG "but" - replicating the structure of my large Aperture library elsewhere is nightmare inducing, and that's before I get to the task of what to do with originals and versions. However, something based on your last suggestion would be very nice to have!
  15. This is replicating what happens with MB and images in the Aperture library. When accessed in Aperture from MB they open as jpegs (or not at all ...) but if you place them in Apple's Picture folder (and use that as a referenced Aperture library), they open as RAWs (NEFs or whatever camera is appropriate). Guess it's an Apple thing ... I had similar issues when trying out other Aperture replacements and gave up.