Our response time is longer than usual currently. We're working to answer users as quickly as possible and thank you for your continued patience.
kirknurse
-
Posts
40 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
duckrabbit reacted to a post in a topic:
Affinity Publisher is not a copy of InDesign - no massive fail!
-
CarlM reacted to a post in a topic:
Affinity Publisher is not a copy of InDesign - no massive fail!
-
CarlM reacted to a post in a topic:
Affinity Publisher is not a copy of InDesign - no massive fail!
-
dcrosby reacted to a post in a topic:
[IDML Implemented] How can I open Indesign (indd and idml) Files in Publisher?
-
SrPx reacted to a post in a topic:
Affinity Publisher is not a copy of InDesign - no massive fail!
-
jmwellborn reacted to a post in a topic:
[IDML Implemented] How can I open Indesign (indd and idml) Files in Publisher?
-
Fixx reacted to a post in a topic:
[IDML Implemented] How can I open Indesign (indd and idml) Files in Publisher?
-
As someone who used InDesign from 1.0, I remember how buggy and the same complaints that people are expressing about Publisher were there as well. While it would be nice for the import compatibility it is not a deal-breaker (for me). If anything new I use publisher and anything old I can either rebuild the file or edit in InDesign -
melriksdesign reacted to a post in a topic:
Affinity Publisher is not a copy of InDesign - no massive fail!
-
flookoco reacted to a post in a topic:
[Implemented] Publisher does not recognize WORD .docx files!
-
Hi I am not sure if this is a bug or feature request. In previous versions of Publisher when I placed a PDF that had crop marks and bleeds it imported as is. The last two versions when I place the document it comes into the page cropped. However, when you go to edit you still see everything. There are instances where those marks and/or bleeds may be required. Is this just a bug or will you be implementing placement options that would allow the user to determine how the external document will be placed?
-
Quarian reacted to a post in a topic:
[Implemented] Publisher does not recognize WORD .docx files!
-
I am by no means an novice I used page layout programs from Page-maker days. Magazines, Catalogues, Annual Reports, booklets I have worked on many multi-page publications. While I understand what you're describing. I think you're over-reaching when you say it won't prevail in a professional environment. It depends on the individual's workflow, Affinity is not Adobe and vise-versa. Two things, 1. Are you trying to force your expectations on the product? 2. When you compare apples to oranges you're setting yourself up for disappointment. Adobe is $600 US per year Affinity products are $50.00 each some level of expectation management is required.
-
As a professional, I can't necessarily agree that it is not production-ready. It depends on your workflow and if you are willing break out of your comfort zone. Many of the issues that the video complained about were non-issues as they were just presented differently than he was accustomed. When I first started using Affinity Products I sat down and went through the tools as I accepted that it was not going to replicate Adobe. I used InDesign from 1.0 and it had it flaws and quark "die-hards" had made many of the complaints that are being made about publisher. In my not so humble opinion, Once you accept that alternative does not mean the product does not match adobe feature-for-feature.
-
It does a decent job of trapping but at the end of the day you're still at the mercy of the printing press
-
Just for the record, I have sent numerous files to print originally produced in Affinity Designer, no issues. As long as you know what you're doing it should be fine.
-
I am a designer but I was fortunate to work with a few prepress houses back in the early days before direct-to-press. You had to do separations to film and then burn plates. Film was not cheap so you HAD to get it correct almost from the very beginning.
-
I second that, It is a big pain in the behind. Set up your native style sheets (in this case apub) and then bring in plain text is the way I have always done it. It can even be a pre-press nightmare as when you're pre-flighting and it's looking for a nonexistent font.
-
"Dead in the water" is a bit melodramatic. I constantly have state this, alternative does not mean competitor. Never once have the good people touted their software as a feature to feature replacement of Adobe's products. Goals and objectives are different in very organization, they may just be looking for a piece of the pie not the whole bakery. There are many many persons in the field that it will suit their needs just fine. Frankly expecting a $50 (US) one time purchase software to match a $600(US) Per year subscription base feature for feature is a tad unrealistic.
-
kirknurse changed their profile photo
-
Or you could try VIVA Designer, they have different packages in terms of cost you should be able to get a version for under $100 USD
-
When Will Affinity Be A Real Photoshop Contender?
kirknurse replied to HarpyG's topic in Older Feedback & Suggestion Posts
It's already an alternative, It may not fit your needs but It does for many. I stand corrected, but I get the impression from you that adobe needs to be crushed in order for affinity to be a success (A lot like that Windows vs MAC Crap). Alternative does not mean it has to match feature to feature. For me any professional tool must offer CMYK support for Offset as the bare minimum. I never really saw Affinity overtaking Adobe to begin with, but as a niche market for some design professionals like myself. -
When Will Affinity Be A Real Photoshop Contender?
kirknurse replied to HarpyG's topic in Older Feedback & Suggestion Posts
What exactly are your requirements? I used Photoshop for 22 years and yes it does lack some features but it is no way a slouch. Just because development is slow does not mean it has stopped. Programming is complex, and their team is no way as large as Adobe's, it will take time. I am genuinely curious what as to what's a must for you? As I used photoshop as early as version 2.0, and had to do many of the automated task manually, so none of the issues with Photo are a deal-breaker for me.