Petar Petrenko

It is even easier one app to read what is done in one app.

This is why I insist all three apps to be joined into one. But they do not want to hear about that. Imagine that a designer has to borrow tools for work from others designers. The app will be smaller, faster and easier to maintain.

That's what I want. All three on one place. But, it is so obvious. MattP said that nobody else offers this and they even could do it. Maybe they will do just what we love + something else that we can't think of.

Maybe they are going to skip 1.7 and give us a higher version with a lot more options than we expect?

You can't find anything about serious DTP on their "features" page: https://www.coreldraw.com/en/product/graphic-design-software/#features

Same as Adobe and, maybe, Autodesk.

Well, they can talk whatever they want, but, CorelDRAW is not even near to DTP. At least, not for long documents.

Yes, now it is OK.

The text remains editable.

OK. The modifer key is their choice. What I want is to have both possibilities: 1. to delete originals 2. to leave them together with the new object.

Maybe it's better if you make a numbered list of your wish list for simple referencing on them?

Yes. it is great. Also, it could be done without separating lines, words and letters. Rotation of words or letters inside a sentence is also welcomed.

Hi, can you add new options to the boolean operators: Some of them give us different results depending which object is on top. Instead of swapping the layers to get the other result, can it be done with ALT + click? Some of them give us a new object and delete the starting ones (like Intersect). Instead of that can we keep all 3 objects by pressing CTRL + click? Combination of 1. and 2. is welcomed, too.

Yes, you do. I've just forgot to mention "frame" when I wrote on next page/column/frame.

Do you mean you set the option in paragraph styles to start paragraph on next/odd/even page/column? If so, the aswer is YES. QXP doesn't have this feature.

Would you be so kind and explain it deeper, please.

QXP is much better than ID, but ID is better organized (menus, palettes, measurement palette...).

No comments from the staff on this, yet?

Maybe, but I would like Pablisher to have them, too. They are very usefull. Page numbers with leading 0's can be found in InDesign, but not in QuarkXPress.

It would be a nice surprise if Publisher features this on Master Page(s): editable master elements on working pages (QuarkXPress); allowing multiple instances of page number(s) -- good for preparing tickets; together with number 2: page numbers with leading 0's or some other character(s) with option > number of leading chars to be user defined.

Last info before some BIG event..

"Should" but not "are". No software is 100% proof. You must face that fact. Betas are unnecessary because users give their experience with retail versions, too.

If both versions are unstable (more or less), why there is beta version?

Why don't you remove beta versions and update/upgrade only retail ones?

Do you plan to finished it in near future? Where it can be found in HELP file?