Jump to content

.: NICKY G. :.

Members
  • Content count

    81
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About .: NICKY G. :.

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday 05/06/1981

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Italy

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. .: NICKY G. :.

    overflow text in new block

    I think it's a small implementation that is missing in AD! They should add it. I understand that for long layouts Pubblisher is better suited to the purpose but with Designers you can make small layouts, tree-folders and it would be very useful to be able to divide the text into columns or let the text blocks continue in other text blocks. Could you add ??
  2. .: NICKY G. :.

    overflow text in new block

    I would like to know how it works in AD! what is the practice to follow in AD, the question concerns "Af Designers" TKS
  3. Hello, How can I scroll the text that does not fit into the text box into a new text box (linked to the first one) ?? As it happens in indesign to understand each other better.
  4. .: NICKY G. :.

    object scrolling bug

    Yes but it would be more logical to have the scroll of the page dragging even beyond the rulers. As it is now you have to be careful in stopping first otherwise you won't move the work table
  5. .: NICKY G. :.

    object scrolling bug

    Ok now it works for me too. yes I extended myself beyond the rulers and the scroll bars. I think it's more intuitive as it works in Adobe. Then oh well they are choices.
  6. .: NICKY G. :.

    object scrolling bug

    that's exactly what I do !!! Except that I don't move. I do not understand! Maybe I have some wrong settings in the preferences ?? Can you send me the screens of your preferences?
  7. .: NICKY G. :.

    object scrolling bug

    you can show me how you do it because I can't do it.
  8. .: NICKY G. :.

    object scrolling bug

    if I have a rectangle in Ai and stretch it, the page scrolls. In AD it doesn't work ... Watch the video. 1 (1).mp4 1 (2).mp4
  9. See that the right export should be done this way, like in the picture! if I have an A4 210 + 297mm document and a 5 mm margin for each side, when I export the document with the crop marks, the cut marks must adapt to the size of the bleed, then export a PDF with a total size of 220x307mm without any further blank space . If the Typographer gives me very precise spaces (table dimension + bleed) I must respect that measurement and not give it a larger PDF which then will have to cut the excess white part, because it will most likely use larger sheets in the machine and therefore others will be placed side by side. pages... In this thing Adobe is wrong too! I never used to add the marks in the PDF export, I always put them by hand or with a JSX plug-in that did this, but still remaining within the limits imposed by the bleed.
  10. Exactly as you say, but an icc color profile different from the color profile in use in the document, it always comes, in any case converted from a source profile to a destination profile, instead the exact procedure is that it must always keep the numeric values and never convert to destination (unless appropriate user requests). In practice, with "no profile embedded" images it behaves well in this way. Now that I remember well "the Adobe theory" there are 3 criteria of choice in color management in Adobe Suite. 1. deactivated 2. maintains the embedded profiles 3. converts into a work profile the right choice is 2, it keeps the numerical values embedded in the color profile of the file. Put simply, consider that photo as if it had no color profile applied and read only the numerical values applied to it. Then in the PDF / jpg export phase etc, you decide to "keep the numerical values" and apply a color profile of your choice, which can be either the work document or other. Practically if I have a fogra39 profile document and I insert images with the fogra39 profile embedded, the numerical values are read in the right way. If I change color profile to the working document and I put fogra27 example and I click Assign, the color profile in fogra27 will change and the numerical values will remain the same as before (and it works well), but if I then have a fogra27 document and insert an image again with different profile eg fogra39, this image will be converted and numeric values will change. In practice, when inserting a photo AD always applies a color conversion in the destination profile !!!! Even if the Convert colors box is not checked in the color preferences. I don't think the color assignment command works well. The color profile of the document should be ASSIGNED to each image inserted, imported, linked to the document so as not to VARY the numerical values even if you work with different embedded color profiles. CAUTION!!! Working appropriately with color management in the press, web, etc. (but above all in the press) is FUNDAMENTAL! Incorrect conversion of numerical values can lead to serious financial damage during printing! A trivial example if a 100% black is converted to a rich black 80-80-30-80 is not the same thing! Not to mention color change in images or dominant etc .. this thing is very delicate Attention Affinity !!! It took me years of study to understand how the "good" thing works in Adobe, now here I find myself headed and above all with the awareness of a wrong management by the software. Affinity we would love to leave Illustrator (because it's shit!) But you have to be able to do it without problems!
  11. .: NICKY G. :.

    bugs ? black overprint

    OK I am confused. I am confused about the fact of the transparency conversion that in pdf / x 2003 the shadow / transparency areas were rasterized as an image.
  12. .: NICKY G. :.

    bugs ? black overprint

    I would not be wrong but in Adobe even the shadows remain vector!
  13. .: NICKY G. :.

    bugs ? black overprint

    I agree with you 100%. A lot of things in AD work great, better a lot better than Ai. But many things and I talk about basic things, they would be improved and revised. Maybe they work but they have a strange logic. 1. Overprint 2. Nero does not overprint by default 3. Color Samples that you can't select more than one, so if I want to convert 50 colors like global color or overprint I have to do them one by one. 4. default global colors 5. viewing of separate color channels and overprinting and spot colors 6. the possibility to export in different color profiles "Maintaining numerical values". Now if I believe a document in fogra39 and I wanted to export a PDF to fogra27, it changes all the numerical values of the colors .. and it's not good!
  14. .: NICKY G. :.

    bugs ? black overprint

    you're right! PDF / X works overprinting. But to make sure that shadows, transparencies etc. don't rasterize what you need to use PDF / X4? I used PDF 1.6 / 1.7 compatibility in ADOBE and everything worked fine-
  15. .: NICKY G. :.

    bugs ? black overprint

    I created a black in overprint in AD, I exported the pdf with black overprint why does Acrobat tell me that black is not overprinted? but does it create a hole inside me?
×