Nicole Hurst Posted December 28, 2022 Share Posted December 28, 2022 Hello! I am seeing two problems with adding live filters to masks. 1. When I try to add a live filter to a layer mask, the filter is placed at the top of my layers (instead of as a child to the mask). I can manually move the filter afterwards to be a child to the mask, but it would be nice if I didn't need to do that. 2. The bigger problem is that when I invert the filter (so that I can paint the filter onto just the desired areas), it will hide all of the filter AND all of the mask. It should only hide the filter, right? Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but if not I would love to have these bugs fixed! 🙂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotMyFault Posted December 28, 2022 Share Posted December 28, 2022 Same on iPad. After V1.5 nesting filters or adjustments intended to alpha channel never worked without severe issues. this tutorial might help Paul Mudditt 1 Quote Mac mini M1 A2348 | Windows 10 - AMD Ryzen 9 5900x - 32 GB RAM - Nvidia GTX 1080 LG34WK950U-W, calibrated to DCI-P3 with LG Calibration Studio / Spider 5 iPad Air Gen 5 (2022) A2589 Special interest into procedural texture filter, edit alpha channel, RGB/16 and RGB/32 color formats, stacking, finding root causes for misbehaving files, finding creative solutions for unsolvable tasks, finding bugs in Apps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicole Hurst Posted December 28, 2022 Author Share Posted December 28, 2022 If this has been a bug since 1.5, that's not encouraging that it will be fixed very soon... 😅 IPv6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lepr Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 On 12/28/2022 at 7:11 PM, Nicole Hurst said: 2. The bigger problem is that when I invert the filter (so that I can paint the filter onto just the desired areas), it will hide all of the filter AND all of the mask. It should only hide the filter, right? I agree that the inherent mask of the filter should control coverage of the filter only and not the mask that is being filtered, and so the current (2.0.3) behaviour is a bug. However, there is a workaround until the bug is fixed: instead of using the inherent mask of the filter, nest another mask in the filter. Nicole Hurst 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicole Hurst Posted December 30, 2022 Author Share Posted December 30, 2022 Thank you! That's a good work around for the time being. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.