HarleyN Posted December 18, 2020 Posted December 18, 2020 Seems like this is either a bug or a programming issue. When using the batch conversion to convert a .jpg to either .afphoto or .png the converted file size is exceptional larger. A 3MB file will jump up to 50-100MB. Seems like the converted file should be roughly the same size as the original? Quote
walt.farrell Posted December 18, 2020 Posted December 18, 2020 Does that also happen if you simply Open the file and then Save as a .afphoto or Export as a .,png file? Quote -- Walt Designer, Photo, and Publisher V1 and V2 at latest retail and beta releases PC: Desktop: Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 64GB memory, AMD Ryzen 9 5900 12-Core @ 3.00 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Laptop: Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 32GB memory, Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz, Intel UHD Graphics Comet Lake GT2 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU. Laptop 2: Windows 11 Pro 24H2, 16GB memory, Snapdragon(R) X Elite - X1E80100 - Qualcomm(R) Oryon(TM) 12 Core CPU 4.01 GHz, Qualcomm(R) Adreno(TM) X1-85 GPU iPad: iPad Pro M1, 12.9": iPadOS 18.5, Apple Pencil 2, Magic Keyboard Mac: 2023 M2 MacBook Air 15", 16GB memory, macOS Sequoia 15.5
HarleyN Posted December 18, 2020 Author Posted December 18, 2020 I opened a 2.1MB .jpg and saved it as a .afphoto which rendered to a 10MB file size. I then took the same original .jpg image and batch converted it to a .afphoto and it rendered at 38MB file size. Also, no edits where made during this process. Quote
Staff Chris B Posted December 18, 2020 Staff Posted December 18, 2020 I opened a 5.8MB JPEG and saved it as an .afphoto file which became 14.8MB. I then batched the orginal JPEG three times and got 5.9, 5.8 and 5.9 however the .afphoto that was created from the batch was 24.5MB all three times. Our .afphoto files can 'bloat' so it's not too much out of the ordinary except that the batch consistently bloated more than a Save As. Quote How to format a bug report | Learning Resources | List of V2 FAQs | YouTube Tutorials
HarleyN Posted December 18, 2020 Author Posted December 18, 2020 I get a little bloating but this seems outright obese. A 4 to5 times increase in an unedited file seems a bit extreme. What threw me off was that generally my Indesign files where much larger then affinity publisher files. So I assumed Affinity was running a more efficient file format across the board. I love what Affinity is doing, just seemed like a hiccup. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.