Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

jamesholden

Members
  • Posts

    122
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jamesholden

  1. 41 minutes ago, Kuttyjoe said:

    Why?  Is it because people have absolutely no reason whatsoever to be frustrated?

    Not sure this entirely makes sense.

     I +1 to @MikeW comment because of the points he made, they were not written for the one you decided to add just now.

    I hope the reason why is clear from his quote, in that I simply agree with him.

    Go pick a fight somewhere else, these are challenging times for many, we all have better things to do.

  2. 30 minutes ago, MikeW said:

    So Matt writes that select same us the next feature he's going to work on, writing that today, and that initially it will work like Illy with it to be extended in the future and you feel the need to be a glass half full type of person?

    Any wonder why Serif stopped responding much to requests? 'Cause if this is the type of response, I would too.

    I couldn't +1 this enough.

  3. 48 minutes ago, debussy said:

    OK, but I work in the architecture business.

    Many people are using Illustrator and sticking to it, because it can import dxf/dwg data.

    This is a basic workflow in architecture & design. Both in practices and in universities.

    This is not a small freak feautre!

    Indeed. And I never said it was small— what I inferring was that the pressing needs of many will differ, almost finitely.

    To repeat, I and possibly others would trade dxf/dwg inport in a heartbeat for fully featured 3rd preset/addons and scipting in AD.

    I suspect for others this is heresy.

  4. 22 minutes ago, debussy said:

    Totally absurd that Affinity does not provide thtat functionality.

    And does not have any answer of how to work with dwg/dxf data.

    Here is a thought, dwg/dxf import is of little importance to me, but the inclusion of 3rd party presets, scripts and add-ons meant everything.

    As I have supposed before, the only development priorities the AD team may be following are their own.

    This may well be the most intelligent option considering so many of us need entirely different things all from the same product.

     

  5. 4 hours ago, robinp said:

    I’m not saying don’t post. I’m just asking to please be considerate of others who, most likely, agree with the sentiment. 
     

    We all want this feature and have done for years. Yes, I’m pretty fed up about it too. But receiving 10 email notifications in quick succession, visiting the thread and actually struggling to get to the most recent post because some of yours are so long the page crashes my phone browser and the page is reloaded repeatedly is just counter productive.

    I have to echo this sentiment.

    This is not even a key feature for me, extensions and plugins are, but I am subscribed and considering the interest here along with the time elapsed this might be seen as a litmus test for AD's growth and development generally.

  6. 3 hours ago, gafvert said:

    I agree that plugin support for Designer would be interesting, but in my case from a developer perspective. I develop some specialized macOS design software for making halftones and patterns that I think could be interesting to make into plugins to fit in better with designer workflows. And since I'm going away from adobe personally I don't want to build Illustrator plugins, so being able to make plugins for Affinity Designer would be great.

    I think we're essentially saying the same things, so agreed.

    I might add that additional support for Illustrator plugins would open up AD's creative potential considerably.

    As a side note I will never forgive you Serif + Affinity for introducing that dreadful reCAPTCHA here :). It's a running joke that no matter the logic you use to select images, you're better off choosing them  randomly.

    Anyhoo back on topic.. 

     

  7. 37 minutes ago, Leigh said:

    Thanks for waiting. Unfortunately, our developers have been unable to recover the file, sorry. You mention above that it was stored an a USB drive, do you know if the drive was unplugged unexpectedly? Did you create any backups of the USB drive at all?

    :(

    Must say though thanks Leigh for you and the team trying, it may have been and no backup of it.

  8. 21 minutes ago, Dan C said:

    Thanks for confirming that James, please let me know once the file has been uploaded.

    Done, many thanks. )

    21 minutes ago, Dan C said:

    We're currently in 1.8 beta, with 1.7.3 having been released since September of last year, making beta 1.7.0.14 considerably out of date!

    Is there a reason you're still using this specific beta version?

    (

    For some reason I never received any notifications about the updates, so hadn't known about this. A bummer TBH.

     

  9. 34 minutes ago, robinp said:

    It was mainly rhetorical, picking up the point from @Mark Ingram about how we've had years of free updates.  This is a common argument made but is more whattaboutery than an actual answer. If they feel hard done by for providing free updates, or for that matter, feel like it exempts them from criticism then I think it is really rather misguided.

    I was trying to make the point that a) we don't get to choose or not whether updates are free or not and, b) that I and many others would happily to get an update that includes this feature.

    I will continue to wait with my wallet at the ready if needed.

    I too wonder if they'd just charge more (frequently), wouldn't they then, by increasing resources, be able deliver more (frequently).

  10. On 12/3/2019 at 12:29 PM, robinp said:

    Where and how do I pay to get this feature added?

    I am not sure if this is rhetorical, or not.

    But if not, my stab at it is that firstly your money won't move the AD team so much. Years of requests may have proven that. Secondly as stated by @fde101 some companies already have this in place, I suspect with varying degrees of features and complexity, but there nonetheless.

  11. On 11/22/2019 at 1:46 AM, Ulysses said:

    ...While I agree that being able to at least read Smart Objects would ease the transition away from Adobe, what I would prefer from Serif is something even better. I have no idea what "better" would mean in precise terms, but perhaps it would make the tasks of editing and switching between Affinity apps even more enjoyable. I think this entire concept that is like a cake that’s still baking in the labs at Serif.

    Agreed. Though the reality is, will we ever see 'better' and if so when. I was a bit of an AD fanboy, but the feature timescales are unbearable, for some.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.