Jump to content
Our response time is longer than usual currently. We're working to answer users as quickly as possible and thank you for your continued patience.


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

950 profile views
  1. For the design of machines I often need to connect 2 rotating parts. In attached example both cranks can be rotated individually. The green connection-piece should move Crank#1 to the right whenever Crank#2 is moved to the right. It probably goes beyond a little modification. But rumors say, Serif is working on 3D-modeling program ... would nice to get this function any which way. Connect two cranks.afdesign
  2. As of 10/26/2018 it is still not possible to combine the 2 red object in a non-destructive way - I am using OSX 10.12.6 with A Designer 1.6.1. Since it is difficult to select the tear with the knot-tool, I have hidden all layer but those two. Also I have tested if the order of selection makes a difference or if it could work by converting the tear to curves … none was successful. So, as I have noted as comment on the tutorial sit I just duplicate both layers and hide them before combining the two shapes permanently
  3. Hi reglico That looks like what I am looking for. Guess you created those brushes yourself Would you mind sending me a copy of those brushes via a post?
  4. Seems that this post covers the same need as I have. The patters should remain the same regardless if you draw lines in a rectangle, diagonal, or a circle. If you bend the line or you stretch an existing line for example to double its length it should still show the original patterns distances and position relative to the path.. If you add a texture like a checkerboard type it does not work for diagonal lines. If you use a texture like on a graph paper it could happen that a vertical or horizontal line picks up just a line (like „Green only“ in my example)- so no „dots“ show anymore. Same applies to textures in form of circles or 45 degree hatched lines. If you work with a „frozen“ texture this might look fine at first sight. But the moment you need to stretch that patterned line it gets ugly (like “Stretched“ in my example). So - in a way I am looking for a pattern which follows a given path. Wonder if the affinity team regards this „nice to have“ feature as doable and feasible. Your question … who needs that? In Germany the protective wiring (grounding conductor) consist of a copper lead in a yellow/green sleeve. Usually the drawings for electric wirings are black and white incl. the respective symbols. But the readability could be improved by using color - at least in case of very critical wiring. In brainstorming layouts one could use those dotted lines to mark a specific type/flow of thoughts. In advertising one could have „line-effects“ simplified The attached demo-file was made with affinity photo ... so no real drawing GreenYellow.afphoto
  5. I had to do yet another comparison. Surprise, the folks at Serif have done a great job. Now I'm happy. My feeling is, that you have now a greater flexibility with Affinity Photo's shadow correction as with Photoshop. Pixelmator dos the job too but with just one slider, further fine-tuning is not part of that effect. The result on the iPad is for me the best. However I have not tried too much on my MacBook to achieve a similar result. So all in all I feel that Affinity Photos has now the best control to correct shadows by not only lighten it but by offering additional sliders to maintain the overall appearance of a picture.
  6. Hi MEB, thanks for your quick help. I obviously was on the right track with boolean but my logic was confused.
  7. Drawing something by rotating is OK as long as nothing is overlapping. I tried a daisy (Daisy.afdesign) and cannot manage that the last leave at 5 o’clock comes on top of the start-leave = 6 o’clock AND remain below the leave at 4 o’clock. It should work using boolean function but what ever I’ve tried … only the wrong portions got cut off. Is there a way to have TWO boolean relations do the trick? The other optien I could only think of would be to apply boolean (DaisyBoolean.afdesign) and cover the not wanted green line at 5:30 via a hand-drawn orange layer. DaisyBoolean.afdesign Daisy.afdesign
  8. I had posted my finding of doing frequency separation first and then lighten shadows. Strange enough this post is gone. So her is again the result of frequency separation = 20 pixel ... after that I could move up with the shadow to 143. The results are better than going through the Develop Persona. Also in the Develop Persona the maximum is 100 - hence the results are not as light as by using frequency separation. But at least its a way to lighten it without washing out effects.The second picture is the result via Develop Persona. By the way - there is no difference if you I convert to 32bit HDR. Both look like the second picture
  9. Hi Lutz, how should one install the beta? On a separate system/drive or can it exist parallel with the current Version 1.6.6 on my standard Macintosh HD ? Regards Affni
  10. It's actually from the current stable desktop version 1.6.6. But my iPad Pro Affinity Photos version 1.6.5 produces the same unreal shadow effect. ... as does Affinity Designer 1.6.0. I realize that this post deals with beta-issues. But I felt it makes no sense to open an extra post on one of the a final versions. I trust the this can be resolved but not with one single slider.
  11. Have the same problem. When I need to lighten the shadows Photoshop offers many options to finetune this process - like selecting the strength and range separately or protect the black. When I do the same in Affinity Photo I only have ONE slider to lighten the shadows. And the result: I get a washed out picture especially when applying it to faces. But even other pictures like of buildings or furniture looses saturation and the color as such is shifting. And you can not compensate this effect by increasing for example the saturation. Since I was not sure, what to post without violating any rights I thought Mr. Bach will not mind, being used for demonstration purposes. First picture ist processed with Affinity Photo, the last with Adobe Photoshop - in the middle is the original.
  12. One more comment from my side. I was actually involved in logistic myself. I agree - the concept of having a „basket“ for all purchases does really not make sense for your small line. If one cooperates with a third party for actual processing and shipment, the communication has to be absolutely clear. Also within the logistics portion of the supply chain it is required for warehouse management as well as selecting the right transport box to differentiate between single- oder multi-books containing parcels. Those who have the fun, to punch in all the stuff to satisfy SAP-based software systems know setting up a new article requires more than only some key strokes. Just google BOM = Bill of Material and you get an idea. So I agree - by keeping the supply chain lean Serif is keeping cost for its customers best under control. One more comment: I am into computers since the late 1970s (Apple II). At those early times you almost always received one or several manuals with the purchase of software … which were obviously included in the price calculation (ZBasic came for example with 5 manuals). In many cases one did not really need a manual. So at that times users often said, why don’t they stop to include manuals and lower prices instead. And if someone needs a manual it should be offered separately. And that’s what we have now today.
  13. Ok - understood ... so, I ordered the books one after the other. Thanks for your quick response
  14. I like to use your special offer for both workbooks = Affinity Photos and Designer hoping to save on shipping. And I would only have to be ready for ONE delivery. But the moment I add the Designer book the Photo-version is gone. So ... I cannot get both books in my shopping basket. What's the trick?
  15. You are probably right - that the max Value of 64 GB includes true RAM and swap. So far I was used (in Photoshop and other programs) to adjust the RAM separately from the cache. Because the RAM setting influences how much "air" ist left for other apps. If you allocate only 8 GB RAM to Affinity Photos you can allocate swap-space separately then you can still open huge file without affecting other apps. In the case of affinity photo you have only the choice. Example: If I want to load 36 GB of files in Affinity Photos fpr no other program is RAM left. If I load 32 GB in programs with separate swap-mangement, I could load 1GB in RAM and 31 GB in swap = leaves 15 GB to other programs. This is surely an exaggerated example. In reality you would probably have no fun to work with such a set-up. Anyway - I was just looking for a confirmation of my assumption. So far there is no really anything I am missing in Affinity Photos compared to Photoshop (which I had been using since 1982 before I left Adobe software )
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please note there is currently a delay in replying to some post. See pinned thread in the Questions forum. These are the Terms of Use you will be asked to agree to if you join the forum. | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.