Matthieu Cannavo Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 Hi everyone, I came into a problem with the support of open type feature in Publisher. I’m using Publisher 1.10.4. I create a typeface with Glyphs app (https://glyphsapp.com/fr/learn/stylistic-sets) and added some extra stylistic set and replacement features as shown in screen-capture "Stylistic-set-panel_in_Glyphs.png" When testing within the software, everything works fine. Plus I add a name for each features so I can find it easily. When switching to Publisher everything goes wrong. I can’t find any of the sets and the one I have seems to have random names (Alternative 1 and so on). Worse, the behaviour is really unexpected as it seems that some features are "merged" and other are partially working (see screen-capture "Font_in_Publisher.png". The only thing working fine is the default mode. Please help me understand if I’m doing something wrong or if it’s just the opentype support that is not doing what it should. Maybe I have to edit my stylistic sets differently but I did it as explain in the available tutorials. Thanks a lot, Matthieu cannavo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walt.farrell Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 It would help to have your font, so one of our font experts can look at what you've done in detail. Quote -- Walt Designer, Photo, and Publisher V1 and V2 at latest retail and beta releases PC: Desktop: Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 64GB memory, AMD Ryzen 9 5900 12-Core @ 3.00 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Laptop: Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 32GB memory, Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz, Intel UHD Graphics Comet Lake GT2 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU. Laptop 2: Windows 11 Pro 24H2, 16GB memory, Snapdragon(R) X Elite - X1E80100 - Qualcomm(R) Oryon(TM) 12 Core CPU 4.01 GHz, Qualcomm(R) Adreno(TM) X1-85 GPU iPad: iPad Pro M1, 12.9": iPadOS 18.1, Apple Pencil 2, Magic Keyboard Mac: 2023 M2 MacBook Air 15", 16GB memory, macOS Sequoia 15.0.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthieu Cannavo Posted December 20, 2021 Author Share Posted December 20, 2021 Hi Walt and thanks for the fast answer, The font is still under development and there is a lot of kerning to do and so on, but here it is, source file and one export Glass-Regular.otf Glass.glyphs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfred Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 You seem to have used non-standard names (e.g. hor, ver, dotz, slaz) instead of ss01, ss02, etc. I suspect the behaviour of the font will improve if you correct this. Quote Alfred Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for Windows • Windows 10 Home/Pro Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for iPad • iPadOS 17.5.1 (iPad 7th gen) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthieu Cannavo Posted December 20, 2021 Author Share Posted December 20, 2021 Hi Alfred, seems to me that any name should work but I will try that, thanks a lot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfred Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 5 minutes ago, Matthieu Cannavo said: seems to me that any name should work From the Glyphs tutorial: Quote Back to our a variations. The key to the stylistic variation is the glyph name. One default a, obviously, is called a. The alternate variation should be named a.ss01. The .ss01 suffix simply means it’s the a of the first stylistic set. If you want more stylistic sets, all you need to do is add the appropriate suffix to the glyph name: .ss02 corresponds to the second stylistic set, .ss03 to the third one etc. Since the maximum number of sets is twenty, your suffixes can go all the way up to .ss20. If you stick to this naming convention, Glyphs can build the feature code for you. Quote Alfred Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for Windows • Windows 10 Home/Pro Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for iPad • iPadOS 17.5.1 (iPad 7th gen) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthieu Cannavo Posted December 20, 2021 Author Share Posted December 20, 2021 Yeah I know this convention but when you’re building a complex system sometimes it’s easier to come with your own name... didn’t know that it was so rigid but thanks again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthieu Cannavo Posted December 20, 2021 Author Share Posted December 20, 2021 Ok seems to work now, thanks again! Callum, walt.farrell and Alfred 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.