recordable to macros inpainting

[kirk23]

So it cold record from what parts of an image  the inpainting  does the copy/paste    and I could make same inpainting  with perfect sync  on another layer

[carl123]

You have not stated what problem you were encountering.

But see this thread just in case it is relevant

 

[kirk23]

8 hours ago, carl123 said:

But see this thread just in case it is relevant

no, that thread is irrelevant to my issue.    What I need is  how  content aware fill works in Artomatix art engine or in Adobe Alchemist .   

For example you have a scan of  a dirt  consisting of two images : rgb color image and corresponding  grayscale depth/height  image .      You in-paint  over selected area in depth image and then wants to do same  on color image.     

You can record a macros and it does make  the  inpainting in both images  in selected area but the inpainting would be  totally  different .        In depth image it  would copy and fill  from one part of same image and on color  it would do   from another part  without any sync to what  it does on depth.     It would render  both images no more related to each other  with totally different details in inpainted  area.

[John Rostron]

Unfortunately, that is the way macros work. For example, if you record a Copy , Paste acrion in a macro  and then apply it to another image, then what gets pasted is a copy of the original image (as recorded). Not a satisfactory action!

John