NotAffine Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 So I tried making a shuriken. For that, I wanted (at first) to make a triangle and cut out a bit of that in the middle. I made a quite simple shape, wanted to duplicate that, flip it horizontally and then combine those. But there remains a seam, no matter how I snap the two together. Someone on an unofficial Affinity Discord Server (credits to gromofdoom) helped me out by saying the snapping was never really working in this software and I need to overlap the two halves, combine them and then delete the unneeded nodes. Why does Affinity make such a simple task this painful? That's a pretty difficult workflow for something that wants to be an Adobe alternative. Or am I blind and there's actually a better way to do that? I attached my project file (with extended history in it!) so you can see what I did (there's much stuff I did which didn't make any sense, lol). shuriken.afdesign rsmcguitar 1 Quote
Staff Callum Posted December 6, 2019 Staff Posted December 6, 2019 Hi Not Affine, Welcome to the forums If possible could you point out where the seam is that you are getting? Also you said you want to combine both shapes wouldn't subtracting the green shape from your triangle work better? Thanks C Quote Please tag me using @ in your reply so I can be sure to respond ASAP.
NotAffine Posted December 6, 2019 Author Posted December 6, 2019 (edited) Ah, damn, I uploaded the wrong file. Uploaded the final result but I forgot to save the history there. Uploading it here now. I'm sure you'll spot the seam in the middle of the green two curve layers. They are snapped to each other but they still have a seam that only gets bigger the further you zoom in. @Callum shuriken (1).afdesign Edited December 6, 2019 by NotAffine added mention Quote
Dazzler Posted December 6, 2019 Posted December 6, 2019 They are actually positioned correctly, it's a visual thing that happens due to anti-aliasing of the edges of the layer. To solve this, click on each of the green layers and click the cog icon at the top of the layers panel. Then in the dialogue that pops up, select the coverage map and drag the left hand point up to make a straight line across the top and it'll solve your issue. Quote
NotAffine Posted December 6, 2019 Author Posted December 6, 2019 3 hours ago, Dazzler said: To solve this, click on each of the green layers and click the cog icon at the top of the layers panel. Then in the dialogue that pops up, select the coverage map and drag the left hand point up to make a straight line across the top and it'll solve your issue. This only solves the issue visually. They're still two different shapes. You can see that if you zoom in quite a bit. Or if you let Designer show you the nodes. Quote
NotAffine Posted December 6, 2019 Author Posted December 6, 2019 4 minutes ago, Lagarto said: The nodes can be merged but only with considerable effort Exactly. I managed to do it with a different method but it was a comparable effort to do so. This could be improved greatly by "just" fixing the snapping, I think. Or, if the actual problem arises because of some problems with the shapes themselves, there should be an option to see/fix those issues! Do you agree? rsmcguitar 1 Quote
Move Along People Posted December 6, 2019 Posted December 6, 2019 - Quote Move Along people,nothing to see here
NotAffine Posted December 6, 2019 Author Posted December 6, 2019 5 minutes ago, haakoo said: zoom in very closely bring them both to the document snapline,then its no effort to add both the green shapes together I think you didn't get the problem. 1. The snapping itself should snap them together so you don't need to do that in the first place. 2. If you do what you said and then zoom in even further, you'll see either that the shapes still don't meet or that the shapes already overlap. You can't possibly put them together just like that, there'll be always a zoom level where it doesn't fit any more. Quote
NotAffine Posted December 6, 2019 Author Posted December 6, 2019 1 minute ago, Lagarto said: But I am condient that Affinity will get these wrinkles smoothed out eventually. The one who helped me combine the shapes originally said Affinity gets said to fix that since around 2015 and they still haven't done that. Of course I can't just believe such a loose statement but if that's remotely true it's pretty sad. This makes working with symmetrical shapes (which are quite common) soo much worse than in Illustrator. If you have a bigger project with symmetrical shapes you'll loose hours on these small details. rsmcguitar 1 Quote
Move Along People Posted December 6, 2019 Posted December 6, 2019 - NotAffine 1 Quote Move Along people,nothing to see here
NotAffine Posted December 6, 2019 Author Posted December 6, 2019 6 minutes ago, haakoo said: No, you simply didn't snap as you can see, it just snapped(green line) and I made it work like you wanted it I could've sworn I tried the same thing but yeah, it works now. But only if I select the nodes (with the node tool selected) and not the whole curve (with the transform tool selected). Right? Quote
Move Along People Posted December 6, 2019 Posted December 6, 2019 - Quote Move Along people,nothing to see here
R C-R Posted December 7, 2019 Posted December 7, 2019 10 hours ago, NotAffine said: But only if I select the nodes (with the node tool selected) and not the whole curve (with the transform tool selected). The Curve snapping: nodes and control handles video tutorial explains how each of the Node Tool's "Snap" options on the context toolbar work. As mentioned at around 0:40 in the video these snapping options are completely independent of the "global" snapping options on the main toolbar. NotAffine 1 Quote All 3 1.10.8, & all 3 V2.5.7 Mac apps; 2020 iMac 27"; 3.8GHz i7, Radeon Pro 5700, 32GB RAM; macOS 10.15.7 All 3 V2 apps for iPad; 6th Generation iPad 32 GB; Apple Pencil; iPadOS 15.7
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.