Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Alex_M

Members
  • Posts

    475
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    : Bulgaria

Recent Profile Visitors

3,109 profile views
  1. Very clever suggestions from all. Thanks! So looks like this is not directly possible without a workaround at the moment. I've just submitted a feature request. Hopefully it will be implemented in an upcoming update.
  2. It would be nice if we could invert the layer selection. This could be useful, for example, with documents with hundreds/thousands of layers/objects where we want to delete all of them except for the few objects we've selected on the canvas.
  3. Yes, it was my intention to leave only these layers. I've stripped away all unnecessary layers from the file as they don't contribute anything to the bug report. No screenshots are needed. Just follow the steps I've provided and you'll be able to reproduce it. Thank you! Yes, when I use OpenCL acceleration this problem doesn't appear (although I have other issues happen sometimes with OpenCL enabled so I leave it off).
  4. Is this possible? My quick search in the help file and on the forum didn't yield any results. I have a PDF open with hundreds/thousands of layers/objects and I want to delete all of them except for the few objects I've selected on the canvas.
  5. Hello, I've got a document where the masks change (white patches appear) when the document's bit depth is changed from 8 bits to 16 bits. Hardware Acceleration/Open CL compute in Settings is turned off. Please check the attached file. Steps to reproduce: Open the file. Go to Document > Convert Format / ICC Profile... Change format from RGB/8 to RGB/16. Check the masks. White patches will appear in the masks. convert-to-16-bit-mask-changes.afphoto
  6. Yes, such option would be greatly appreciated!!! I acknowledge the speed of Affinity Photo and I can attest to it. However, when I finish a project and go on to archive it, speed becomes irrelevant since most of the time it's not expected for me to work on it anymore (or at least not actively). In this case, I want my files to be as small as possible in order to save on disk space (cloud storage can be expensive with large imagery and other media!). 400mb is waaay too much for a simple 8-bit document at 4800x3200 px with a single image layer, I think you would agree. Now consider that I have at least 4 of these documents on average in a project and you get the idea of how quickly things start getting out of control sizewise. That's 1.4 GB of storage that shrinks down to just 75 MB when I use linked layers/purge the cache and archive with 7zip (I've just tested this). I certainly can use the workaround where I create a new document from scratch and copy all the contents from the old one in there and save again with a new name. However, this is really cumbersome and time consuming with a lot of documents when there could be a simple feature called "purge cache" or similar that removes all cached stuff from the file when the user is not expected to work on it actively and it's fine to wait a bit more for things to load next time. I hope you consider this feature. Let me know if I should post a new thread about it in the Feedback & Suggestions section.
  7. Hello. I still have this problem with Affinity Photo 2.4.2. A document with a single linked image layer (PNG image) is almost 400mb. Can you kindly look into this issue? Would you like me to send you this document?
  8. Thanks. I've just updated to 2.4.2. I will let you know if it happens again and send the generated crash report.
  9. Hi, @DWright , This is not true for Photo version 2.3.1. Please see the video I recorded below. Was this functionality intentionally removed in the new versions, and if yes, why? photo-231-pan-while-using-live-filter.mp4
  10. There's been an issue since the past few updates where picking colors by using the ALT+LMB shortcut crashes Photo to desktop. Has anyone else experienced this? I'm on Photo version 2.3.1. Are there any crash reports generated that I should send?
  11. That's really odd. Why no option to change this? This must be the first software I've seen that doesn't allow its users to stop update checks (apart from Windows, which is understandable to a degree as an OS can become vulnerable to hacks if left outdated for a long time). I'm not really confident with fiddling in the registry. Unfortunately, I often have a lot of software that uses a lot of RAM running all at once, and also to clear my taskbar which is often filled up, so I can't leave Photo open all the time and I often have to close it at least 4-5 times a day. So I'm just going to be nagged to death? Looks like a bad design and user experience choice. I'm not a programmer, but I would imagine it wouldn't take that many hours to put a simple checkbox in the preferences that stops the update checks if there's already a hidden way to do it by messing with the Windows registry.
  12. Hello, There are bugs in the newest version of Affinity Photo that compelled me to stay on the previous version (2.3.1). How do I disable the update message box that shows every time I start the software? I've looked everywhere in the preferences and I didn't see an option to disable update checking or showing of such messages. Is there no option to disable this message?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.