Jump to content
Our response time is longer than usual currently. We're working to answer users as quickly as possible and thank you for your continued patience.

Affitoom

Members
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Affitoom

  1. I ALREADY FIND A PROBLEM with what I did, the Link studio does not recognize me now Designer, nor Photo. ____________________________________________ YA ENCONTRE un problema con lo que hice, el estudio Link no me reconoce ahora Designer, ni Photo. Tendré que volver hacia atrás y devolverle los nombres originales al los .exe. I'll have to go back and return the original names to the .exe.
  2. Thank you very much randontako, you are a genius!👍👏👌 It also worked for me to rename the .exe from Designer.exe to DesignerV1.exe, so I think the name can be anything. What I don't know is why it works, but it works. I have not noticed so far that it negatively affects the application, in fact I did it with Photo and Publisher and the problem was also solved. If someone can explain to us why that change of name in the .exe solves the crash of the program in this specific case, it would be great if you explained it to us. _________________________________________ ¡Muchísimas gracias randontako, es usted un genio!👍👏👌 A mí me funcionó también cambiarle el nombre al .exe de Designer.exe a DesignerV1.exe, por lo que creo que el nombre puede cualquiera. Lo que no sé, es porque es que funciona, pero funciona. No he notado hasta ahora que afecte de manera negativa a la aplicación, de hecho lo hice con Photo y Publisher y también se solucionó el problema. Si alguien nos puede explicar por qué ese cambio de nombre en del .exe soluciona el crasheo del programa en este caso específico, sería genial si nos lo explicara.
  3. sí, a mi también me gusta más en check box, no me gusta mucho de lo que hicieron con el panel de capas.
  4. No me gusta la mayoría de los cambios en UI en general, los iconos nuevos más que nada. Solo la el icono de la regla, la mano, la cuchilla, y la lupa no me desagradan tanto. El icono de la herramienta de relleno me parecía muy propio de Affinity, muy distintivo, además era más vibrante y llamativo. Muy bonito. Pienso que a algunos de los iconos nuevos les agregaron complejidad que no necesitaban y que ya en los viejos habían resulto bastante mejor, más simples y suficientemente legibles. (Ej. El icono de Crop tool, el de Corner tool, el de Contour Tool, el de fill tool, el de Texto Artístico y el de Caja de Texto.) Otra cosa de otras que no me gusta es esta ventana, no sé, me gustaba más la anterior. Lo de marcar los ajustes de documento favoritos si me gusta. También los iconos de cada tipo de documento, pero el preview del documento con los márgenes o con el “marquito” que se le hace cuando se marca la opción de "crear mesa de trabajo", o el icono en el centro del documento (tal vez mejor como antes que le ponían en el centro la leyenda: A1, A4, Letter, o según el formato del documento), no me gusta estéticamente hablando. Lo del resumen del documento no sé para qué. La disposición vertical de las opciones de ajustes del documento me gustaba más que la de forma horizontal en pestañas. No entiendo para qué meten lo de la Cuenta de Usuario ahí, y las muestras, me gustaba más en la pantalla de bienvenida. Yo no hubiera tocado nada de la UI, solo agregar los de las herramientas nuevas y remozar alguna que otra cosita. Prefiero la mayoría del UI anterior. Pero bueno, ni modo por mí, me quedaré con la versión anterior. Espero no nos abandonen con el soporte a los que no podamos cambiar a V2.
  5. +1I have the issue Mediamaskinen A mi me agradaría mucho que lo arreglaran.
  6. Well that's your criteria, I think it would be good but thanks for your reply 👌
  7. Wow! Sorry 😧 Sorry to ask for a feature that I find useful. I thought that is the objective of this space (ask for features and give feedback to improve the software). I do not expect my ideas to be accepted by everyone as if they were perfect, I only share them in the hope that some will be considered to be integrated into the application. On the other hand, I am not interested in making Affinity Designer a copy of Adobe Illustrator or other software, I only refer to other software to support the idea I am trying to communicate. I'm really sorry to have bothered you.
  8. Well, good question. I suppose that there could no longer be layers that were not associated with some "Artboard", not with this feature or workflow that I propose. Thanks for the question walt.farrell
  9. Yes, all that is great, what I request is to keep the layer panel more free. That only the layers of the "Artboard" in which you are working are shown. Example: if I am in an "artboard 1" the layers panel only shows the layers of that "artboar 1" and if I switch to "artboard 2" the layers panel shows me only the layers of "artboard 2" ". I think all the features of the Afinitty artboards that you like shouldn't have to change at all. It is just so that there is more order in the layer panel and not so many layers accumulate that it makes its administration more difficult. Thank you for your response and criticism.
  10. I requested something similar in a new topic, without realizing that it already existed (sorry for that). And obviously I second the request of TonyO.
  11. Sorry, I didn't see that one, I found another one, and I understood that it was not the same as what I was asking for. Thank you for your wake-up call
  12. Can you implement a function in the node tool that allows us to remove a node with one click? Maybe using a modifier key (Shift, Ctrl, or Alt) + click on the node we want to remove; or simply by clicking on an existing node. Something like this: Thanks! 😉
  13. Can you designate an exclusive panel for what has to do with the administration of the "artboards"?, something like what illustrator has. Just so you don't accumulate a bunch of "Artboards", each with its own layers (be it a few or a lot) in the layers panel. Some way to show, in the layers panel, only the layers corresponding to the "Artboard" in which we are working, for greater order.
  14. I think it would be good if when we started to draw our designs, each figure was housed from the beginning within a layer, to start each project in a more orderly way. And I think they could save us the trouble of creating layer 1 ourselves. I think Illustrator does it like this, in the layers panel every new document has always "Layer 1" created by default and then all the shapes that are drawn are stored within that layer. *Also in every "Artboard" created, I think its "Layer 1" should be created automatically.
  15. Maybe if we add new alignment handles to the "show alignment handles" option. We would have: align to the upper left corner, align to the upper right corner, align to the lower left corner, to the lower right corner and align to the center and the middle.
  16. well, there is always the possibility to customize our toolbar But you are right in what you say, thanks for your answer
  17. Yes you're right. Yes, surely almost nobody would use that kind of functions, I thought about it because I used it a lot in other software (Corel Draw) that allowed me to create a macro where I combined the alignment to the center and the middle, so that I could do those two steps in just one, it also allowed me to assign a short-cut and even create a button of my own to that function. I think I will have to resign myself to continue doing things as before. Thanks for your reply.
  18. Yes, the method you use is fine. But I think having a single action to align to center and middle would be great. Thanks for your reply!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please note there is currently a delay in replying to some post. See pinned thread in the Questions forum. These are the Terms of Use you will be asked to agree to if you join the forum. | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.