JpLaf

I'd like to make it clear that I'm extremely satisfied with Affinity Photo, but I personally expect the developers to develop the software in the spirit of Photoshop, in particular for "automatic" selections such as "sky, background, object", etc., so as to save time in Post Production. In any case, thank you once again to the engineers, who have succeeded in making an extremely powerful piece of software, at a very aggressive price. Affinity Photo is much more precise, and more pleasant to use, if I compare it to DXO and ON1. But this is just my personal perception of Affinity Photo.

I completely agree with the person who made this comment. As professional photographers, we need Photoshop-type development. I think that a lot of development has been done recently for designers and graphic artists.

I would like to thank the engineers for developing such remarkable tools: Compound Mask Luminosity Mask Colour Mask I have to admit that it's now impossible to do without them when I'm post-producing my photos. Best regards JpLaf

Good evening, I've just read in the IT press that Microsoft has just removed the "ms-appinstaller" protocol, which manages the installation of MSIX files. Given that I installed my Affinity Photo 2 version using this file format, how will they manage the installation of future updates, which will then be in ".EXE" format ? Thank you in advance for your reply. Hervé Lafontaine

Hello, In order to harmonise the way Affinity Photo works (V 2.2.0), I'd like to suggest a small modification to the "De Haze" module. Could you change the way the module works so that the settings you make are automatically applied when you close it, without having to press the "Apply" button. Thank you in advance for your understanding. Best regards. Hervé Lafontaine