joe_l

Expanding e.g. Exposure on the Basic tab makes the checkbox ticked. Collapsing makes it unticked and removes the setting. Same behaviour in Details and Tones, but not in Lens. Here expanding and collapsing has no impact on the state of the checkbox. Any good reason to remove settings while collapsing the items? This irritates me.

Percentage, both in retail and beta on Win 10.

Menüpunkt FENSTER, dann TEXT.

I know this is nitpicking. The German help talks about selected cells (plural), so I would expect, that this is a selection on a per-row-basis.

I could argue, that since I selected several rows, I mean the bottom border of all selected rows. Bottom is bottom, not the very bottom.

Imagine a table with several rows and columns where all bottom borders are 3 pt thick and all other borders 1 pt thick. Workflow right now: 1) Select the whole table. 2) Pick "Bottom" and change to 3 pt. + 3) Keep the selection, pick "Inside Horizontal" and change to 3 pt. This could be shortened with just step 2). I mean, I selected several rows not just one, so why does only the last row get a thicker border?

Den findest du jetzt im Menü "Fenster" > "Text".

Pardon? A textframe cannot be copied? Is there any major difference between textframes in 2.1 und 2.2 I missed? I can understand, that from 2.x to 1.x is no compatibility, but between subversions? Why do not simply "flag" elements as not compatible and make them invisible when you open 2.2 in 2.1? Of course I am no software engineer, so I cannot figure out consequences from this.

Only photo format option in Export?

Hmmm weird. Not able to produce this anymore. A hiccup in the software? Thanks for checking.

This is not the case in 2.1.1. 1. Have a filled text frame. 2. Click into it and deactivate the text ruler if shown. 3. Deselect the text frame and doubleclick it with the Move Tool. Result: Text ruler shows up again.

@Ash You mean <X Handle>? 😄 No, honestly. Very nice feature, well done.

1. Draw a polygon. 2. Hit . to cycle the selection box to regular bounds. 3. Change the width or height of the polygon with the Transform panel. Result: The base box of the polygon will be displayed. 4. Now manually change the size of the polygon with any of the handles. 5. Hit . to cycle the selection box to regular bounds. 6. Change the width or height of the polygon with the Transform panel. Result: Still the regular bounds of the polygon will be displayed. My wish would be anyway to have the option to make the type of Selection Box to be sticky (or not).

+1 for a rotate option and having the choice to have more than 100 duplicates.

You Win, Dennison Mac?

Oh dear. I didn't see this option. 🤦‍♂️ Thx!

I attached a video.

Frequently I temporarily group objects and now I have to type in a name for the group? Naming groups can be helpful to keep everything organised. BUT this is an extra step creating a group. What was so bad about renaming a group afterwards, instead of being forced to name it directly? I like the idea behind this additional dialogue, but I would like to see this as an option somewhere. namegroup.mp4

This is the proof. I am old. 😭

Loreley, Germany at the Bizarre Festival. Not to sure if it was 87 right now. I have to look at the ticket at home, I am getting old resp. I am old. 🤦‍♂️

I saw them on a festival in 87. Well, not too much seeing after a few liters of Vodka-Lemon. Their concert was pretty cool (the other 4 or 5 times also). Thx for your poster, inspiration for seeing them again after so many years. 🙏 Edit: Amsterdam is already sold out. I was too late. What a pity.

Export as tab separated list and copy the content of that list into the table. Yes, I know, this is too much work too.

Maybe pasting a tab separated list might help? copypaste.mp4

Personally I would like to see, that you can change the position of guides via the Transform panel instead of approximating the position manually or entering a menu for a precise position more than having colors for guides, which is fine and obviously a wanted feature.

Still confused. You made a 200 pages document in Indesign? Why don't you finish it in Indesign? Obviously there is something going wrong with the IDML import. You should ask a moderator to give you a private upload link for them to check your document. To be clear: There is NO feature parity between Indesign and APublisher, so opening an IDML in APublisher means addtional work in APublisher.