Saijin_Naib Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 2018-09-30 01.22.55 [X-S1].7z I know this file is a particularly difficult sample, but I've been watching your journey to improve such files since the 1.5 release and beyond, and I'd like to see the RAW processing engine handle things like this better before 1.7x launch, if possible. I've collected a number of comparison images across other engines in this thread below: Summary: Affinity Photo does worse than most every other RAW processing engine I've tested, though I've seen improvements from v1.6 stable to v1.7 beta, though they're not drastic. However, the proper application of the Lens Profile is most welcome and appreciated. PaulAffinity 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staff Sean P Posted November 23, 2018 Staff Share Posted November 23, 2018 Hi Saijin_Naib, The original issue is still with development to be improved, so I've passed on your updated feedback to the development team. Thanks for letting us know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saijin_Naib Posted November 25, 2018 Author Share Posted November 25, 2018 On 11/23/2018 at 6:15 AM, Sean P said: Hi Saijin_Naib, The original issue is still with development to be improved, so I've passed on your updated feedback to the development team. Thanks for letting us know I hope I don't come off disparaging or too critical. I'm hugely fond of Affinity, but it just doesn't work with my RAWs well yet. I hope you can get things worked out, not only for my sensor, but for all RAWs. thanks for your work! Sean P 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.png.07777caea1576ad7ffbb2d0a7a5146f2.png){kind=avatar}
Recommended Posts