ashf Posted December 3, 2022 Share Posted December 3, 2022 There's a strange problem with these fonts. GenEi Gothic N / 源暎ゴシックN GenEi Gothic P / 源暎ゴシックP Somehow only the numbers are distorted only on Windows. And it happens with only these traits. Light, Semi Light, Bold, Semi Bold You can obtain those fonts here.https://okoneya.jp/font/download.html#dl-geg-all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenmcd Posted December 3, 2022 Share Posted December 3, 2022 59 minutes ago, ashf said: There's a strange problem with these fonts. GenEi Gothic N / 源暎ゴシックN GenEi Gothic P / 源暎ゴシックP Somehow only numbers are distorted only on Windows. And it happens with only these traits. Light, Semi Light, Bold, Semi Bold You can obtain those fonts here.https://okoneya.jp/font/download.html#dl-geg-all I do not know much about CJK fonts or vertical fonts ... The characters/glyphs inside the fonts look fine. There are minor differences in figure heights for regular vs. half-width, but nothing like that in the image. The 5,6, and 9 are definitely vertically distorted (not alternates, distorted). Weird that is only those characters. I think it is because the fonts are designed as vertical fonts, and the Affinity applications are having some issues with processing some of those vertical tables (VORG, vhea, vmtx), and some of the OpenType vertical features (vpal, etc.). I have seen some CJK fonts which were designed as vertical-only that simply did not work in horizontal text. But these look like they were designed for both horizontal and vertical. So they should work. Looks like a bug. ashf 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ashf Posted December 3, 2022 Author Share Posted December 3, 2022 The font author says they are basically for the horizontal writing, although it works for the vertical writing as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staff Dan C Posted December 12, 2022 Staff Share Posted December 12, 2022 Hi @ashf, Thanks for your report and our sincerest apologies for the delayed response here. I can confirm I've been able to replicate this issue here and I've logged it with our developers now for you ashf 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ashf Posted September 13, 2023 Author Share Posted September 13, 2023 Still the same in v2.2 beta. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.