ashf Posted November 7, 2022 Posted November 7, 2022 Please add the force integer pixel option for resizing/transformation without creating sub pixels. Such as in the Resize Document / the Resize Canvas / the Transform panel / the Export window loukash and pixelworker 2
pixelworker Posted November 14, 2022 Posted November 14, 2022 This is one of the main flaws. Working pixel perfect it's super difficult and frustrating in Affinity. ashf 1
pixelworker Posted November 14, 2022 Posted November 14, 2022 @ashf I think you should post it again in the current forum for Version 2. This one is archived. ashf 1
ashf Posted November 14, 2022 Author Posted November 14, 2022 Please move this topic to the V2 feedback section.
tudor Posted November 20, 2022 Posted November 20, 2022 On 11/7/2022 at 4:50 AM, ashf said: Such as in the Resize Document / the Resize Canvas / the Transform panel / the Export window Your request makes sense for free transform operations. But the functions you mentioned are based on numeric fields where you have to type some numbers. Can't you just use integer numbers there?
loukash Posted November 20, 2022 Posted November 20, 2022 3 hours ago, tudor said: Can't you just use integer numbers there? You can. But sometimes you may want a global setting that would block any attempt to enter decimal values. Even at the risk that it may result in slightly unpredictable jumps e.g. when proportionally resizing a rectangle. I.e. when advised to do so, the engine should always round up or down to integer, no matter what action is being performed. MacBookAir 15": MacOS Sonoma > Affinity v1, v2, v2 beta // MacBookPro 15" mid-2012: MacOS El Capitan > Affinity v1 / MacOS Catalina > Affinity v1, v2, v2 beta // iPad 8th: iPadOS 18 > Affinity v2
tudor Posted November 20, 2022 Posted November 20, 2022 8 minutes ago, loukash said: Even at the risk that it may result in slightly unpredictable jumps e.g. when proportionally resizing a rectangle. Adobe XD is one app that does exactly this: it always forces pixel alignment, no matter what. This breaks regular shapes like perfect squares, polygons or circles whenever you resize more than one shape at once. Look what it does to concentric circles: loukash and ashf 2
ashf Posted November 20, 2022 Author Posted November 20, 2022 5 hours ago, tudor said: Your request makes sense for free transform operations. But the functions you mentioned are based on numeric fields where you have to type some numbers. Can't you just use integer numbers there? That does not work when you lock the aspect ratio. And rotation is another problem.
Recommended Posts