Jump to content

Transparent not transparent


Recommended Posts

Hi Guys I have just installed the new version 1.8.5 of Publisher, and found a really bad printout problem. I have two different Canon printers (MG7550, and TS8251) both are showing the same thing via Stright print out, and also export from PDF. A dark background is showing where it should be completely transparent. It does not show on the program, or on the PDF, only on the prints. This has never happened before the upgrade to this new .5 version. I am not happy, as this is a very bad bug to have just appeared. Is there any way to down grad back to the previous version?

Hope to hear from you soon on this matter. 

Thanks!

transparent background not trsnsparent.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Gabe, I have attached the afpub, I did buy direct from you, and still have the downloads of 1.8.4 from the previous version, can I just go over what I already have, and will the program allow for the downgrad. Thanks for your HELP!

NOS4A2_season_2_(MKV_HD_HEVC).afpub

Edited by accesstime
also will I have to down grade photo and designer as well.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Staff

Thanks. I just tried it in 1.8.4 with the same result. The problem is not the app, but the images you used. They are CMYK images, with an sRGB icc profile. This is wrong and should not be possible, as the colour model of RGB and CMYK is completely different. I suggest you convert your images to either CMYK (with a CMYK colour profile) or RGB(with an RGB colour profile) and you should not have the transparency issue. 

16 hours ago, accesstime said:

and still have the downloads of 1.8.4 from the previous version, can I just go over what I already have, and will the program allow for the downgrad

If you already have 1.8.4, you don't need to re-download it. But that's not gonna fix the issue anyways. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry I am not sure I understand, as I have used the icon images in many other layouts as is without this problem ever coming up. The main picture tells me it an RGBA/8 with sRGB IEC61966-2.1 profile. checked the 18, and this has RGB/8 with sRGB IEC61966-2.1 profile. only difference is "A" not sure what the "A" in the profile does to the picture. I tried changing the profile to CMYK but there was no option to do this in Photo. I then looked at a picture I had done Tuesday, using the same two icons on a main picture, checked the profile of that picture, and it is RGB/8 with sRGB IEC61966-2.1 profile. Transparent background on both the two icons was as expected, and until now I have never had this problem. Is RGBA/8 not supported within publisher, and if not would changing the format to say PNG make it work, as the icons are both transparent PNG pictures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok! I found away in to convert the main picture into a CMYK picture when resaving as a JPG from within Photo. which appears to have worked, this I fear maybe the only work - around for the problem. I think that the "A" maybe a new copyright add in to the RGB format to stop people from using a particular picture in the way I use them. So, in future I will look for the "A" in a profile and change to CMYK before using the picture in my work.

Thanks for your HELP!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, accesstime said:

The main picture tells me it an RGBA/8 with sRGB IEC61966-2.1 profile. checked the 18, and this has RGB/8 with sRGB IEC61966-2.1 profile. only difference is "A" not sure what the "A" in the profile does to the picture.

"A" is Alpha. It is used for transparency, although it can be used for other things in some apps..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi anon2,

Thanks for the information about the "A", I wonder what it had been used for in this picture, as there is no transparency needed in this picture. Unless this picture was made from many different layers to composed within another program. I have found that all the pictures on the site I got this picture from has the same Alpha channel "A" within their description's, and this is the only time I have come across problem. Now I am aware of this, I will look for this before I use their pictures. Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.