Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Gmit

Members
  • Posts

    45
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Gmit

  1. Ok, i uploaded it.

    One annoyance i encountered when opening the .afpackage file:
    It tells me to update every linked resource which is fair enough.
    Sadly when updating these files, the page box gets reseted to TrimBox, while the original setting was BleedBox.
    So i additionally put in an .afpub file so you don´t have to do that work.

    Thanks

  2. Hi @Dan C,

    yeah that dpi value is unusal. On export for the web i need to meet an strict filesize requirement. So i play around with compression and dpi values until it fits.
    Sadly no, even when exporting with the document resolution and the downsample option activated/deactived/changed, the exported pdf shows the same problem.

  3. Hello there,

    got an issue with the pdf export from APub.
    In APub everything is nice and tidy. Pics are placed correctly.
    I placed these individual pages into another APub-file. The layout is still fine.
    But the exported pdf for web seems like there are some images moved:

    image.png.a14558386cdeed13a6835503c7932a43.png

    in APub there is space between image and text:
    image.png.dfa14a6edc4b28a3c5f53d90838e1576.png

    Here the layout in APub:
    image.png.9f3097417180c88d862a0bd59d0205a3.png
    Here the layout in the exported pdf (pic moved up):
    image.png.d21f3ca85481f945d481f3e4aab6b031.png

    It doesn´t happen in the print-pdf. Only in the pdf with reduced file size.
    Here are the settings:
    image.png.06b1a209aa46494746e1f505bf1cfb0c.pngimage.png.4acd7f813b760f76b857c23ff900deb9.png

    I already tried different export settings to maybe fix that issue, couldn´t find the faulty setting (combination).
    Many pics are not affected.
    I tried exporting as jpgs. No problem there
    I tried to "clean up" the pages sometimes there are unneccesary elements on these pages. No effect.
    I also deleted everything besides the image. Still the image moves around the page on export.
    It didn´t happen before on other projects with web-pdfs some months back.
    Hardware acceleration is on.
    Killed the Nextcloud-App which is used to sync the files. No effect.
    Exported old projects with these settings: The problem appears there too.
    The only thing that seemed to help is to rasterise the images. Almost every image is within a picture frame.
    I tried it with the same settings on my notebook and desktop, both windows 10. Both same issue.
    Viewed the pdfs with different apps, maybe i got a faulty pdf-viewer. Everywhere it is the same.
    Got the lastet version of APub and all the other Apps.

    Anyone got some tips?

  4. Sadly got the same issue. Saved it on the internal storage of my windows computer all day. No Problem, also the thumbnail updated every time i changed the first page. Then on export there were some funny artefacts in the pdfs so i restarted the whole computer, thinking it would might solve the problem. Nope Publisher can´t read the file correctly and reverted back several hours..... After saving the recovered state, it went from ~110MB to ~8MB....

    Something is going on there, no other app has a problem on my storage devices.

  5. Yeah your link helped me, i played around with the compatibility settings:
    grafik.png.35b10b905b0018d73e3980363c618ea7.png
    and it works on both displays

    That setting i am only used from old videogames, where the UI gets also very tiny on higher resolution displays.

    And i just noticed that this setting sadly introduces a blurry interface.

  6. Hello there,

    I got the issue that the windows explorer doesn´t scale correctly on my second monitor.
    grafik.thumb.png.a5a7e006dbc531c8a17ecf9cf0c06b26.png
    compared to the main
    monitor:
    grafik.thumb.png.edaa4ebc7cb368e39f9ab15ff140b3b4.png

    I got a Windows 10 PC
    a uhd display set to 150% scaling
    a 1440p display set to 100% scaling
    the 1440p display is set to be the main display.

    The rest of the UI scales without any issue, between the screens, but as soon a "Save as" window or anything involving going into the file system and the scaling is too small.
    If i set the uhd screen to be the main display, the scaling gets too big on the other display.
    If i set the scaling on the 1440p to be 150% the scaling works on the uhd display.

    Other software is able to scale the explorer correctly on both displays, so i could see that the issue is within the Affinity Apps.
    And it is the same in Photo, Designer and Publisher.

    Did i miss something or is it just so unusual to have same sized screens with different resolutions =>different scalings

  7. Hi there,

    in my latest beta build (1.9.1.967) when i scale the page up, at ~ 300%, the master page content goes away.
    No problems with export, or so.

    Yes that content goes away, if i hide elements behind the master page content they reappear when zoomed in.

    I can reproduce that by creating a new document, put rectangle/text/images/... on the master page, apply that master page to an empty page.
    Then scale that page up.

    Turning off and on GPU acceleration doesn´t change that behavior.

    I have an tablet connected with no screen (XP-Pen G640), my Win10 considers itself completely up to date.
    cpu: 4790K gpu: GTX970 (Driver: 461.70) 32GB RAM

    That issue doesn´t appear in the non-beta release.
    And i added an example file which shows that error on my machine.

    can someone else see that bug?
    Or is there even a (new) setting which hides master page content when scaled up?^^

    MasterPageBlank.afpub

  8. 1 minute ago, HarryMcGovern said:

    Yes, that's it. The relationship between Grid Spacing, and Font size. Font is 10.5 and grid spacing is 11. No problem.

     

    huh? After fiddling with that, now ther isn't a problem. I don't get tthe samee effect. It's gone away. ???

    So I turned on Use Baseline Grid in the text frame.  That's all. Now, it doesn't exhibit that behaviour

    Grid spacing is 12.6 pt
    Fontsize is 10.5 pt
    So i don´t see a problem there?

  9. 8 minutes ago, Old Bruce said:

    It comes down to using percentage for leading you can change that to exact and see if that will work for you.

    Ah yeah a good advice

    I played around with the leading:
    If i change it to 12.6 pt the problem is still there.
    If i change it to 12.5 pt everything is fine.
    If i then change the baseline-grid to 12.5 pt the issue comes back.

    Interesting behaviour.

  10. Hi there,
    i am facing a problem with the drop caps,
    don´t know if i just didn´t get how they work or there is a bug or so.

    I have a drop cap at the start of the text. But if i change the size of the textbox the drop cap changes in size.
    The only solution i found was to ignore the baseline grid. Which i am certainly not a big fan of.

    Am i missing something?

  11. Hi there,

    i created a template for a magazine in DIN A5, mainly aimed at beginners.
    Experts change things like colorspace, bleed,....

    All the images you see there are from unsplash, pexels and pixabay and also are only in 72dpi in that, so replacethem :D

    I also got a german and english version so the naming of textstyles and other things make sense for non-german speakers.

    Fonts necessary (both free):
    https://www.fontsquirrel.com/fonts/fira-sans
    https://www.freefonts.io/akrobat-font-free-download/

    have fun with it :)

    and tell me if you got any ideas improvements, i don´t do templates very often.:)

    I put the template under CC0, so yeah have fun with it.

    Template A5 004 Englisch_7.jpg

    Template A5 004 Englisch_6.jpg

    Template A5 004 Englisch_5.jpg

    Template A5 004 Englisch_3.jpg

    Template A5 004 Englisch_1.jpg

    Template A5 004 Englisch_2.jpg

    Template A5 004 Englisch_8.jpg

    Template A5 004 Englisch_9.jpg

    Template A5 004 Englisch_10.jpg

    Template A5 004 Englisch_11.jpg

    Template A5 004 Englisch_12.jpg

    Template A5 004 Englisch_13.jpg

    Template A5 004 Englisch_14.jpg

    Template A5 004 Englisch_15.jpg

    Template A5 004 Englisch_16.jpg

    Template A5 004 Englisch_17.jpg

    Template A5 004 Englisch_18.jpg

     

    Template A5 005_1.jpg

    Template_A5_german.aftemplate Template_A5_005_englisch.aftemplate

  12. Maybe my computer needed an additional restart or so, to take on the new cmyk-profile. I did a quick retest and now it behaved exactly as you just described.

    So, i would leave it at that, i already put so much time in that question and asking different people, checking what different apps are behaving,.... and all of that just out of curiosity.
    Your explanation makes sense, and from the quick test it looks like that´s how it should behave. Unless someone proofs a different behavior.
    I can´t say that this knowledge helped me work better, i don´t put cmyk-values in my rgb-document^^ But it made me more confident in my knowledge of the Affinity Apps, i know more what is happening under the hood.

    And i choose that Newspaper profile to have a easy time to tell the different cmyk-profiles apart. Interesting you say that "if often a bit overdone" for that brownish tint. But i also to 99,99% of the time don´t work with newspaper-paper or similar, but good to know :D

    Thank your for your time and input, most likely the best source of information in researching that question.


     

  13. yeah it´s not the question "should i work this way?" No, obviously not^^
    I asked out of curiosity "what is happening under the hood?".

    Yeah the "lock colorspace" also wasn´t clear to me, for a longer time.

    At least on my test it didn´t take into account the last cmyk colorprofile i used or the default cmyk in the preferences.
    So let´s say i am confused.^^
    I changed my default cmyk profile to "Japan Color 2002 Newspaper" which is very small and the K100 also ends up in this brown-dark grey.
    And did create some documents in that colorspace and saved them and stuff. Still when i created a new rgb document and created a K100 Color which was way darker and the brown-tint is gone.
    I created a ROMM RGB Document and put a bitmap with the newspaper profile in it. That colorspace is way smaller than i could create with the cmyk-sliders.

    At first i thought they simply convert the values like these online color-converter: https://www.rapidtables.com/convert/color/cmyk-to-rgb.html
    (which yeah are quite funny, but are waaay too simplified) But a simple tested proofed me wrong.

    So i am at a loss. Krita for example asks for an colorprofile when changing the colortool to a different colormodel than the document colormodel.
    That´s what i get, but i don´t get what is automagically happening here.

  14. First i asked that question that question on facebook and it failed. Many didn´t understand that question correctly and told me about the basics about color-management and how that is a bad idea,......
    that´s not the question.

    If i let´s say have a AdobeRGB Document and choose a color with the cmyk-sliders. They are clearly limited and don´t cover the whole AdobeRGB colorspace. The question is to what colorspace are they limited?
    I changed the default cmyk-colorprofile in the preferences but that didn´t affect the cmyk-sliders in rgb documents in any way, so it doesn´t seem to be based on that.
    So what are the cmyk-sliders based on?

     

  15. Hi there,
    i know how to export single page pdfs  that´s not the problem.

    But i am over and over again explaining people how to do that.
    Because the words the settings uses is not so clear for so many people.
    Many printshops use the word "Einzelseiten" and so people search for that exact term and don´t find it.

    So how about changing "Alle Seiten" to "Alle Einzelseiten" which would clarify what exactly is happening with this setting?

    Joshua
     

    image.png

  16. 3 minutes ago, Joachim_L said:

    It happened again right now. APu suddenly opens PDF as default programme. Please test it yourself.

    1. Restart your PC.

    2. Start APu. Then use File -> Open to open a PDF file.

    3. Save the new file as you like.

    4. Open the PDF you opened in step 2 with doubleclick.

    Result: Now APu is default for PDF. If I change back the default programme for PDF, all PDF will be opened with the default PDF viewer (in my case Acrobat Pro) until the next machine reboot. My OS is Windows 10 Pro. So I have still no clue who is to blame. ;)

    Did exactly that and the PDF still did open in the default pdf-reader, not in APub. On 2 windows machines. Something is weird on your side.

  17. 3 hours ago, Joachim_L said:

    I guess I know what Sam Neil means. From time to time the Affinities hijack the file association of other formats. I experience this mostly with PDF. So once a day I have to correct the file association. I wonder if this is an Affinity matter or a Windows 10 matter. If I recall it correctly I never had such a problem with Windows 8.1.

    aaah i heard of that from other software too and i see many fingers pointing to windows. Some recommend restarting some services some other recommend reinstalling windows. The later seems a bit extreme, but most certainly fixes it. Just searched for "Windows File Association" and yeah many complain about having to choose the app which opens the file every time, it changed to some other app,.... seems not so nice to have that bug.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.