Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

jackamus

Members
  • Posts

    2,390
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jackamus

  1. 4 minutes ago, G13RL said:

    If I've understood the question correctly, you can draw a sloping line to the vanishing point.
    Set "Enable Transform Origin" to the vanishing point.
    "Ctrl/Cmd + J".
    Slightly rotate the line at the end opposite the vanishing point.
    Repeat "Ctrl/Cmd + J" as many times as necessary.

    OK I know how to do that and I've used that many times but if the angle of those strokes were almost parallel the VP would be miles to the right and taking back to the VP would be impractical.

    What I am asking is given a top stroke and a bottom stroke being a small angle different, can equally spaced intermediate strokes then be drawn using Power duplication that are only long enough to fit within the work area?

  2. Can 'Power duplicating' be used to create a series of straight strokes that will follow back to an origin that is way off the visible illustration area? By this I mean imagine a series of lines going off to the right to meet at a perspective vanishing point that is at a distance way off to the right of the illustration area. I do have a possible way of doing it but because I do not know how Power duplicating works. I did try to search for it but got nowhere. I'll make my suggestion depending on any replies that I get.

  3. 14 hours ago, Pšenda said:

    If the center anchor was selected - then the position would jumped. But since the OP apparently did not understand the meaning of this shape, I assume that he did not even use it, and therefore that the anchor was set to the default state (top left) - that is, the position does not change when the size is changed.

     

    14 hours ago, Pšenda said:

     

    Spot-on. That is exactly what happened now I am a lot wiser.

  4. It would be useful that when changing the size of a QS ellipse (circle) that when it changes size it is still coincident with the original major and minor axes.

    At the moment before changing the size of a circle I need to place a vertical and horizontal guide positioned coincident with the centre of the circle and then changing the size. The new circle jumps to a new position and then I drag it to centre on the guides.

  5. 7 minutes ago, NathanC said:

    I've just now tried this with a CMYK/8 document palette and to my surprise it worked! This can easily be mis-interpreted by myself and others to be an auto-selection of a specific palette when creating a document in a specific colour format, I'll update the exiting issue since this function definitely needs some clarification. Cheers Walt.

    This appears to be an action you take when opening a new doc. Is there a way to make the Greys pallet a permanent default setting? My reason for asking this is because the bulk of my work is technical drawing and I f I need to choose a colour I use the Colour wheel. Otherwise I only need the Greys pallet.

  6. Somehow I believe that there is something fundamentally wrong with how guides and snapping works. It not as intuitive as I would have expected. There are too many different setting and procedures which can either switched 0n or Off or playing around with layers in order to get it to work in a particular way.

    I would suggest that there aren't that many AD users who know all the different ways to use AD. That is why I'm looking for a vector app that is more intuitive and meets the needs of a low level vector drawing artist.

    Maybe its my age but I have the same problem with Smart phones and modern car control systems. They all have far too many options, settings, choices and gears!

  7. 8 minutes ago, Pšenda said:

    If snapping will work correctly, then there is no need to display handles - snapping will ensure position to the right place. If the snapping doesn't work, then showing handles won't help you to snap correctly anyway, because you'll only be doing it approximately "by eye". That's why your comparison with moving a group is not relevant, because it is already done in principle only approximately "by eye", and therefore the visibility of group objects is necessary.

    P.S. The visibility of handles when placing guides could certainly be controlled in the same way as the visibility of object boundary when moving (Hide Selection while Dragging).

    I would agree if snapping was reliable nut it isn't because it can't be. A guide does not know which handle you want it to snap to. If the handle was always visible at least you would see if it snapped to it or not.

    I believe you are only saying this because you do not want to admit the obvious - which is that it is much better and not worse to be able to see a handle when snapping a guide.

  8. Hi Dan,

    Thank you for showing the guide snapping problems which I wasn't aware of! I started this thread complaining about the bounding box handles disappearing whilst trying to drag a guide to snap to them. You have really highlighted this particular problem in your various videos above.

    It seems that even you do not see my particular problem as being part of all the other snapping problems. Is there some thing wrong with me that I seem to be the only one who wants to snap guides to handles without the handles disappearing?

    Do you not think that it is a good idea for handles to always be visible when moving guides to snap to them?

    To me it is logical that if you want 2 things to interact together i.e.guides and handles, that both should be visible at the same time.

    Imagine wanting to drag an object into another group but the other group disappears whilst moving the object and then reappears when you think you have moved the object far enough and discover that it needs to move just a little more. Logic dictates that the object and the group should both be visible at the same time whilst carrying out the move.

  9. 14 minutes ago, Dan C said:

    Thanks for the clarification all, my apologies as I had missed the specificity of the bounding boxes midpoint in the original post.

    I agree that this does not seem correct, and I'm uncertain of the exact cause of some of the behaviours I'm seeing here currently. I'm going to raise this internally with the team and I will be sure to update you here with my findings in due course :)

     

    Thanks Dan. At last someone is going to try and do something about it.

  10. 12 minutes ago, Pšenda said:

    Personally (Windows) I have a problem with snapping horizontal guides - sometimes I can't snap to rectangle B, then "something" happens (I change the selection in the Layers panel, change the position of the Layers panel, ???) and more than once it snaps reliably, then again "something" happens and I can't snap to rectangle C, etc.

     

    I find the snapping ability to be quite unstable with grouped objects.

    So it seems that it is not just a problem of disappearing bounding box handles but a snapping problem! Looks like I've opened a can of worms!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.