Jump to content

Manu R

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    22

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1.    Aammppaa reacted to a post in a topic: Way to scale rounded corners proportionally?
  2. Manu R started following .EXR support, Hotkey for selecting when using color picker, No pressure sensitivity in Designer and and 2 others
  3. Manu R
    Is there a hotkey for temporarily switching to the selection tool when using the color picker? I constantly keep hitting "V" and back to "I". I would expect to see a hotkey like Command/Control to temporarily switch to the selection (move) tool.
  4. Manu R

    No pressure sensitivity in Designer

    Manu R replied to Manu R's topic in (Pre 1.7) Bugs on Mac

    Vector brush
  5. Manu R

    No pressure sensitivity in Designer

    Manu R replied to Manu R's topic in (Pre 1.7) Bugs on Mac

    Did that, it doesn't work.
  6.    Waltervob reacted to a post in a topic: No pressure sensitivity in Designer
  7. Manu R
    There doesn't seem to be any pressure sensitivity in Designer. Brushes respond to pressure in Photo, but not Designer. macOS 10.12.4 Wacom Intuos Pro, latest driver installed 6.3.21-8
  8. Manu R
    One thing I dearly miss in Designer is the ability to scale skew and rotate a selection of vector points (vertices). Another small little thing that annoys me is that you can't use the ALT key to duplicate anything in the Layers palette even though that is how it works on the canvas. It would be nice to have some consistency.
  9.    Alfred reacted to a post in a topic: Way to scale rounded corners proportionally?
  10. Manu R
    I would call it more logical. :)
  11. Manu R
    Not bad. But unfortunately, it doesn't work if your artwork contains corners with different radii. Typing 50% in the input field will set all corners to the same radius which is not what it should be doing IMO.
  12. Manu R
    Is there a way to scale corners proportionally without having to convert to curves? And why'll I'm at it, how about line thickness? Can that be scaled proportionally without expanding the stroke? Sorry if this has been answered before, it seems such an obvious thing to ask for but I can't seem to find it anywhere.
  13. Manu R
    I see, thanks. But really, when adding a new feature like that, shouldn't it default to the old behaviour? It's very disruptive when you open an old file and it suddenly outputs differently.
  14.    Manu R reacted to a post in a topic: Designer doesn't output transparency in PNG?
  15. Manu R
    I'm pretty sure that in the past I exported PNGs from Designer with a functional alpha. Using the latest version, that doesn't seem to work anymore. Any ideas?
  16. Manu R

    .EXR support

    Manu R replied to Manu R's topic in Older Feedback & Suggestion Posts

    Oh cool. Will you be supporting OpenEXR 2.x with tiled multi-resolution?
  17. Manu R
    Affinity Photo supports quite a few file formats out there. One that's sadly missing is .EXR, a format that's gained quite a bit of popularity in the world of 3D. One problem is of course that .EXR goes up to 32 bit/channel and Photo only goes up to 16 bit/channel. So my request doubles up as a request for 32 bits/channel support.
  18.    matt reacted to a post in a topic: Can't always deselect shape with Node Tool
  19. Manu R
    When clicking in empty space with the node tool, it deselects the current shape. But when you drag in an empty space, it doesn't deselect. This seems to be inconsistent to me.
  20. Manu R
    Any reason why it's not available when using the HSL sliders? Or the Colour Wheel?
  21. Manu R
    Unless I'm mistaken, there aren't really any ways to manipulate the visibility of multiple layers in one go, like toggling the visibility of all other layers than the current one, solo-ing a layer or dragging over the visibility tick boxes to change multiple layers in one go. In fact, you can change the locking or opacity of multiple layers, but not the visibility. I admit some my examples smell a bit of the typical Adobe ways of doing things, which is not necessarily how it should be. It's more about the principal.
×