Jump to content

Tomáš Luža

Members
  • Content Count

    21
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. @carl123 Ahh you are right as long as group is object free (only pure adjustments) I am good. It actually works as intended then and could be worked around by doing seperates group (one for adjustments and one for objects) and then group those 2 groups into one master group and I am ok. Thanks for pointing that out! Edit: Yeah PS can handle that, that's why I was confused about it in a first place. Nvm maybe in the future AP shall handle it aswell.
  2. Hello there, today I stumbled upon curious problem. I made a few adjustments to final layer and whenever I put those adjustments into group final result is changed. Is this intended or I don't know... ? See gif below Using latest version of AP (1.7.3.481)
  3. Thank you but I am good with 1.7.1 yet. I was just curious if it were safe to upgrade. All good, I got info and I'll wait a bit, its not a problem.
  4. I see, good thanks for info. PS OT: GL with Johnson...
  5. Hey guys, is this bug already solved? I can't find any answer to that and I don't want to instal new version only to downgrade again. Thing is that everytime I open AF there is an updater that pops up to remind me to update to 1.7.2 but I can't do it unless this is solved.
  6. Well it might look logical but it is not what you think it is. In this case adjustments should affect upper layer (actually only the upper layer) becasue they are bind to it (I don't know any other words to better describe it). It should and DID work just like I am describing before 1.7.2 update. EDIT: OK since this is still confusing for someone I will demonstrate further more. Here you can see that adjustments are not just put below top layer they are put "inside top layer" aka bind to. Then they were put into group so it is easily managable (like hide or show) but that group is still "inside top layer" so it still should affect top layer (actually ONLY that layer). Here you can see how that works wonders without group. And here you can see how this can be usefull (that it affects only that specific layer). And finally here you can see how it again doesn't work when used as grouped adjustments. I am actually confused that it is confusing for someone as I thought that this method is bread and butter for almost anyone who works with this kind of software?
  7. Ok I just tried new clear file. Put an image into it and then applied adjustments (black and white) and put them under that specific image layer worked fine, then i put those adjustments into a group and well...doesn't work anymore. And just to make things clear, it worked before the update.
  8. I second this problem. It seems that not just masks but also adjustments itself doesn't seems to work when put UNDER a specific layer in group (does work when there is no group). I'll try to demonstrate see pic below :
  9. Hello guys, frist of all great job on another version! However I have stumbled upon a small tedious detail that doesn't seems to work (tested on 2 pcs). In 1.65 when I created adjustment layer I simply used mask that was created along with it and painted right into it and small thumbnail preview poped up on icon of that adjustment layer that showed what was painted and what not. After today's upgrade this preview stopped popping up and since then there is only a white blank screen. There is a workaround to use manual mask ontop of specific adjustment layer and that manual mask DOES show preview. Any chance that you could look at that? TL:DR - Adjustment layers inbuild masks does work but preview thumbnails of adjustment layers inbuild masks are broken. (see pics as attached) Thanks and cheers, T.
  10. Hey I just stumbled upon this topic, because I was looking to solve this specific problem aswell. This macro works wonders (too bad AP macro system doesn't remember the way you change size of canvas e.g. =+ 52 rather it does take in account the final number that comes out). Thank you for this I just changed radius and combined your macro with another macro and I am good to go (good think is that you can actually macro record pressing another macros and therefore combine multiple macros into one prime). By the way Note3: You can assign a shortcut key to a macro to make it easy to run instantly - how can I assign keybind to a macro? Cheers
  11. Hey @Dan C thank you for clarification. Nevermind and I'll patiently wait for this feature, it is still awsome piece of software! T.
  12. Hello there, I have got another curiosity I wanted to ask about :). Is there a way to attach a mouse button to shortcut? Let's just say I don't really favour pressing ALT + Right mouse button and Left mouse button to be able to adjust width/hardeness of brush size. So can I rebind it to just let's say ALT + RMB? I tried to do that but wasn't able to get mouse buttons to keybinds at all. Thanks, T.
  13. @GabrielM I just tested it and it looks promising. There is still a bit of a lag when you paint and then release mouse button it takes like 1-2 seconds to update preview in thumbnail, but still that is good enough as long as it doesn't get completely stuck. Will further testing. Thanks
  14. Hello @GabrielM, thanks and I will do. Just wanted to ask, can I install it alongside my Af. Photo master build? I suppose this won't affect my main installation? Thanks, T.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please note the Annual Company Closure section in the Terms of Use. These are the Terms of Use you will be asked to agree to if you join the forum. | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.