cramosm Posted May 31, 2017 Share Posted May 31, 2017 When I try to record a macro for resizing pictures to exact pixels, the macro records the transform process in terms of percentages applied to the resulting file. That's convenient, but it would also be convenient in exact number of pixels, regardless of the size of the initial file. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFisher Posted June 1, 2017 Share Posted June 1, 2017 Hi cramosm :)Macros are still being developed and will improve over time, feel free to post any suggestions in the Feature Requests section.For now rather than using the transform you could try Document > Resize Document for your macro. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBMiller Posted July 1, 2017 Share Posted July 1, 2017 I've tried to create a macro that resizes images to a 600px horizontal dimension at 72dpi. When I apply it to some images it resizes the 600px dimension correctly but not the vertical. It looks like it is using the final vertical dimension from the image used in the macro creation instead of recalculating a new one based on the new image size. The image comes out a bit squashed looking. Image one is the resized image used to create the macro. Image two is the new images I want to resize. Image three is the result. Am I doing something wrong or is it in the macro creation? Donald EDIT: The images loaded in reverse! The last one in the row is the first to look at. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.