jamesroy Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 I did a save as of a CR2 image that originally was 29MB and the AFFINITY saved file is now 182 MB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staff Lee D Posted November 10, 2016 Staff Share Posted November 10, 2016 Hi jamesroy, The large file sizes happen because our file format is optimised for loading speed rather than size. Some things that can have an effect on the file size are saved history, resampled image data. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staff James Ritson Posted November 10, 2016 Staff Share Posted November 10, 2016 Hi James, This is typically because developed raw images are processed to 16-bit images - it offers more precision but increases file size exponentially. Before you save your .afphoto file, you might try the following: Go to Document>Colour Format>RGB (8 bit) to convert the image to 8-bit and save file space. Go to View>Studio>Snapshots to bring up the snapshots panel. You should see an initial "Background" snapshot. Delete this as it's essentially a backup copy of your image that takes up file size space. Hope that helps! And just to re-iterate, you should either do this before initially saving, or use Save As to ensure the document is saved cleanly. Quote Product Expert (Affinity Photo) & Product Expert Team Leader @JamesR_Affinity for tutorial sneak peeks and more Official Affinity Photo tutorials Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kodiak Posted November 10, 2016 Share Posted November 10, 2016 I did a save as of a CR2 image that originally was 29MB and the AFFINITY saved file is now 182 MB • The critical point here is that the RAW file contains all the recorded data from the sensor… but it is not an image! Since a RAW file has no colour space, no channels nor layers, all the info is data in a rather compact form. Once saved, the conversion implies creating a picture, an image, including colour space, bit depth, and the necessary chan- nels to reflect the chosen output colour space… thus justi fying, explaining, the dramatic increase in file size. The cool thing is that, in the RAW converter, the original take is not altered in anyway. All rendition tweaks are recorded in some kind of xmp (sidecar) files that the converter always read to render an "on screen" jpg illustration of your work. As long as you stay in your converter, the original size of your file remains unchanged (but for the small sidecar xmp files). The chosen "save as" format of the final version will be bigger if saving the image rendition in 3 or 4 channels, adding to that the resulting effect of a higher bit depth and lower or lossless no compression. The chosen "save as" format of the final version will be smaller if the image is saved as a "flatten" image, with lower bit depth, and lossy compression. So I stay as long as possible in the converter and publish for pixel editing as last step in the post production. *** I am a photographer, not a programmer… I expressed this the way I understand it. Please correct the terminology or any mistake (s) I could have done! Quote www.kodiakmedia.at bureau@kodiakmedia.at TeamViewer: 668 015 544 Skype: kodiakonline If personal taste is involved, Light is free, Mother Nature provides the light discussion is pointless. capturing it is NOT. but talent renders the image. (Charlychuck) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.