FatCatStudio Posted April 3, 2024 Posted April 3, 2024 When the layer is selected, but its visibility is turned off, I can still paint on it. I can't imagine any kind of situation when I would want to do that. Affinity Photo 2 v2.41, MacOS Sonoma 14.4.1, last Intel iMac. Quote >^..^<
NotMyFault Posted April 3, 2024 Posted April 3, 2024 This is a feature, not a bug. 9 hours ago, FatCatStud!o said: I can’t imagine any kind of situation when I would want to do that. Maybe lack of imagination. If you trace a layer below and don’t want to cover it during painting you can use linked layers to get the visible result in a copy of the layer the only point to made is that Affinity lacks a content lock against unwanted changing of certain layers. But this should be independent from layer visibility. Ldina and _考槃 1 1 Quote Mac mini M1 A2348 | MBP M3 Windows 11 - AMD Ryzen 9 5900x - 32 GB RAM - Nvidia GTX 1080 LG34WK950U-W, calibrated to DCI-P3 with LG Calibration Studio / Spider 5 | Dell 27“ 4K iPad Air Gen 5 (2022) A2589 Special interest into procedural texture filter, edit alpha channel, RGB/16 and RGB/32 color formats, stacking, finding root causes for misbehaving files, finding creative solutions for unsolvable tasks, finding bugs in Apps. I use iPad screenshots and videos even in the Desktop section of the forum when I expect no relevant difference.
NotMyFault Posted April 4, 2024 Posted April 4, 2024 To add an even stronger use case: you can edit multiple layers in one go (toggle “edit all layers”). you may have a stack of many layers, to keep things organized. Now imagine you want to add some pixel content in all layers, but need to hide some of the layers during painting to focus on the relevant parts. Affinity has much more use cases than one single person can imagine, and one of the core advantages is that it doesn’t block some functions to enforce only specific use cases. E.g. Allowing filters and adjustments for CMYK documents. Unfortunately this leads to many complaints due to unexpected results (as many adjustments are based on additive color model and provide strange results in subtractive CMYK model (thus technically correct). Quote Mac mini M1 A2348 | MBP M3 Windows 11 - AMD Ryzen 9 5900x - 32 GB RAM - Nvidia GTX 1080 LG34WK950U-W, calibrated to DCI-P3 with LG Calibration Studio / Spider 5 | Dell 27“ 4K iPad Air Gen 5 (2022) A2589 Special interest into procedural texture filter, edit alpha channel, RGB/16 and RGB/32 color formats, stacking, finding root causes for misbehaving files, finding creative solutions for unsolvable tasks, finding bugs in Apps. I use iPad screenshots and videos even in the Desktop section of the forum when I expect no relevant difference.
FatCatStudio Posted April 4, 2024 Author Posted April 4, 2024 20 hours ago, NotMyFault said: This is a feature, not a bug. Maybe lack of imagination. If you trace a layer below and don’t want to cover it during painting you can use linked layers to get the visible result in a copy of the layer the only point to made is that Affinity lacks a content lock against unwanted changing of certain layers. But this should be independent from layer visibility. Ok, you got the point. NotMyFault 1 Quote >^..^<
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.