affinota

old thread, but as it seems there was no progress. Are there some plans to implement zotero in affinity publisher now or in near future?

ah, ok, thanks for the explanation!

ah, ok, so this inner bleed of the white page, which appears on the page with the graphic will not be in the printed version?

1. just print it as hard cover book on BoD with glued binding. As I understand, I need inner bleed there because of the pages, which have graphics on the whole spread of two pages. And BoD sais, I must have bleed on all sides. I suppose, otherwise it will show an error while uploading. But maybe I'm wrong. 2. yes, this is also what I think. There is no possibility to set different bleed just to some pages within one document.

@walt.farrell ah! I suppose, that's the point! I must change the layer order! Will try it next days, thanks! #edit: it works, thanks!

@werfox thanks! What if I have a document with different pages, some graphics cover the whole spread and some just one of the pages? As I understand, I must set "no inner bleed" on the white page, which is together on one spread with a full site graphic and the page with the full site graphic do need the inner bleed. F. e. left page is white and right page is covered with graphic. On the left page I set no inner bleed, but on the right page I set the inner bleed. 1. Is it the right way of thinking so far? 2. How can I realise different bleed setings in one document? cheers affinota

Hi, if I have one page with full grafic on it, which should not go through the whole spread of two pages, but it should have no white margin in the middle, whats the trick? If I just export the pages (not the spreads) - and thats what I want to do - I get some of the grafic on the other (white) page, BUT I have also some of the white page on my grafic. I hope, you know, what I mean It's a good thing, if I have one grafic going through the whole spread, but what about this situation? Should I change something to get the result I want? cheers affinota

Hi, I have inserted a new text field on a page and made some endnotes. Now the already existing text field below has the lower endnote as the inserted text field above. It should have higher endnote. Can I change the chronology of the text fields for the endnote count? cheers affinota #edit: I just deleted the field below, made a new field and copied the text, now the number has changed to a higher endnote. But is there any better solution for such problem?

I didn't touch the text with these broken endnotes, that's the point. So as it seems this whole endnote topic is a very fragile thing! So I must set these broken endnotes again... puh... If I delete one of the zeroed endnotes and set it again it appears again as 0! Even if I delete the text in the textfield, then edit it in libre office (delete all footnotes) and insert it again, I get 0 while seting the notes again! What do you mean by "type outside of the brackets"? Ah, you mean, if I activate "show note marks", I see the blue brackets on the endnote page and all the notes, I copied again, they are outside the brackets. But they make no problems. The zeroed notes have no entries (just as in the PDF), so there is nothing in the brackets. #edit: ok, after deleting the text field, creating new and copy the text inside, the endnotes get numbers instead of the 0 in the endnote page. I have no idea, what it was. I suppose, it was a bug, because I did not change anything in that text field before getting the zeroes.

ok, everything was ok, I worked a little bit on design of the book, without changing anything to endnotes and now I have this stange problem (attached as pdf for I could not save this page only). The endnotes are all there and publisher shows me just 0 0 0 0 for some of them. endnotes.pdf

ah, they did not disappear. They come just after the numbers. So I have three field with endnotes. - first: everything is ok - second: the ongoing numbers from the first field are there, but the entries for the numbers come after all numbers and they are without any numbers, smth. like that: 71 72 Entries ... - third field has the same problem I can copy all of them on the right places, but how can I say to all these three fields they should appear in ONE field? #edit: ok, I just manually push all the endnote bodies / fields together the end of the document Now I must just correct the entries, which are now below the numbers. So I copy them to the right numbers. I suppose there is a better way to do it

they disappeared after I reverted all notes to document settings It's no problem for I work in a copy of the document, but it would be nice not to write them all again

yeah, as it seems, this was the issue, thanks! This scaling handle is a strange thing.

ok, thanks, I will try to manage it. As it seems, I have a little chaos with some self defined notes. I've done as you said and I choose under "restart every": document. For I want to have all endnotes of the document on one point. The problem is, now I have just numbers of the endnotes, all entries for the endnotes are gone / empty except the first field. Is there any possibility to keep the already written endnotes in the list or must I write them again?

here it is. By the way, how can I save just some pages? Now I just deleted the pages before and after, but is there a better way to do it? Ah, I remeber this evil thing! I had problems with that by some footnotes. I will try to reset, thanks! I suppose, that could be the solution. medienkritik.afpub