Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

With the stock version of Affinity, there was no profile for my Olympus 12-45 F4 Pro.   I have downloaded the latest database from Github, installed mil-olympus.xml in the lens profile folder via Preferences and restarted Affinity.  I have confirmed that mil-olympus.xml contains a profile for my lens (it is the last one).   Despite this, opening a RAW file does not select a profile for this, and neither does it appear in the drop-down list.

I think I have followed the correct process.  What might be going on?

mil-olympus.xml

Posted

Very strange, I can see it using your xml file, the entry <model>OLYMPUS M.12-45mm F4.0</model> matches the second Olympus lens listed. I can't comment on auto selection though

The attached file contains only the data for your lens which might be worth a try

Olympus12-45.png

olympus12-45.xml

Microsoft Windows 11 Home, Intel i7-1360P 2.20 GHz, 32 GB RAM, 1TB SSD, Intel Iris Xe
Affinity Photo - 24/05/20, Affinity Publisher - 06/12/20, KTM Superduke - 27/09/10

Posted

The problem with this database is that the Metadata Lens name do not always match with the Lens name in the database. I have a Panasonic lens where I after a lot of trial and errors was successful after renaming the File name in the database to its full Panasonic name, despite a much shorter name in Matadata.

My suggestion is that you play around with the file name in the Lens name in the Lens Profile database.

Posted
1 hour ago, Lars Nordberg said:

The problem with this database is that the Metadata Lens name do not always match with the Lens name in the database.

Yep. I managed to find a raw file using this lens:

Exif
<model lang="en">Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-45mm F4.0 Pro</model>


Lensfun
<model lang="en">Olympus M.Zuiko ED 12-45mm f/4.0 Pro</model>
 

It works now

WorksNow.png

olympus12-45.xml

Microsoft Windows 11 Home, Intel i7-1360P 2.20 GHz, 32 GB RAM, 1TB SSD, Intel Iris Xe
Affinity Photo - 24/05/20, Affinity Publisher - 06/12/20, KTM Superduke - 27/09/10

Posted

Thanks to both of you.   I was getting there myself, but I had been comparing the contents of tag <model> which seemed to match rather than <model lang="en">, which I had assumed to be a display value.   Cheers, Chris

  • 1 year later...
Posted

I've just bought the OM-5 camera with this lens & Affinity wasn't recognising it. The metadata created in the image files uses a different lens name. So I assume that while the older lenses of this type work with the custom lens profile the newer ones don't.

I've created a modified version of David's file, which works for my lens...attached.

BTW, lensfun seem to have two XML files featuring this lens: mil-olympus.xml and another file with om in the name & just a single entry for this lens. I'm sorry to be vague, but I find it difficult to navigate the lensfun sites so although I saw & looked at the XML file last night I can't find it today. Having two XML files with slightly different entries for effectively the same lens might cause confusion.

om12-45.xml

  • 1 year later...
Posted
On 7/25/2023 at 11:48 AM, ciscrh said:

I've just bought the OM-5 camera with this lens & Affinity wasn't recognising it. The metadata created in the image files uses a different lens name. So I assume that while the older lenses of this type work with the custom lens profile the newer ones don't.

I've created a modified version of David's file, which works for my lens...attached.

BTW, lensfun seem to have two XML files featuring this lens: mil-olympus.xml and another file with om in the name & just a single entry for this lens. I'm sorry to be vague, but I find it difficult to navigate the lensfun sites so although I saw & looked at the XML file last night I can't find it today. Having two XML files with slightly different entries for effectively the same lens might cause confusion.

om12-45.xml 9.67 kB · 32 downloads

Someone has created this issue in the lensfun project and we need a raw image taken with this lens to process it. The image can be taken with the lens cap on and uploaded here. Please make a reference to issue #2376 in the comment of the upload.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.