Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Engine44

Members
  • Posts

    214
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Engine44

  1. 44 minutes ago, Alfred said:

    Cover the windows with a yellow rectangle and set the blend mode of the rectangle layer to ‘Multiply’.

    So your saying that HSL Adjustment is the wrong tool?

    I put a rectangle yellow rectangle around the windows but they came out different shades of yellow.  I would like them to be the same shade.

     

     

    7C5498C6-46EE-440C-8E34-8E510820C637.png

     

  2. Obviously, I’m doing something wrong.  The first image shows a tower with a number of windows.  I would like the windows to be lit yellow.  I selected the windows and copied them to a new pixel layer.  I selected the HSL Adjustment.  See second image.  I can’t seem to get any colour to show in the windows.  Any suggestions please,  Thanks

    4A6F92CB-AF2D-49AB-B174-A295F0F86B90.png

    1B2F4DA3-2631-47A5-85E2-9646FCF2E0FB.png

  3. 12 minutes ago, Alfred said:

    To modify an adjustment, double-tap the adjustment layer in the Layers Studio. The controls for the adjustment will be displayed on the Context toolbar.

    Interesting but it brings up another point.  Let’s say I have a Brightness adjustment set at -100 but that is not enough. If I want to reduce the Brightness further, I apparently need to add a second Brightness adjustment. Is that correct? Thanks.

  4. 39 minutes ago, stokerg said:

    Hi Engine44,

    Once you've made the selection you can then apply one of the Adjustment layers, to that selection.  The Recolour adjustment will all allow you to change the colour of an item.  By making the selection and then using one of the Adjustments, this will automatically create the mask from the selection :) 

    It worked, thanks.

  5. 2 hours ago, DM1 said:

    Gradient maps from adjustment studio are useful too. You can select colour ranges for shadow, mid tones and highlights and add additional points. In the channel studio. You can then invert the adjustment layer and use its built in mask and a black paint brush to brush in the effect to the areas you want. I find them useful when colourising b/w photos.

    Thanks. I need to learn more about Gradient Maps.

  6. Hi,

    In the attached photo, the tower layer is sitting on top of the grasses layer and doesn’t look natural. I thought of the following solution:  On the grasses layer select/save the grass area that is covered by the bottom of the tower.  It will be a new layer.  Delete the tower parts so only the grasses show.  Place the layer onto the main photo and align.  In effect, I am creating a png grass only layer.

    Can you suggest other methods that are easier? Thanks.

    6D8CAA00-1C53-4718-84C9-02EE8DBCF91C.png

  7. 6 minutes ago, Paul Mudditt said:

    Ok, better description perhaps is scalable raster image which retains it’s original imported resolution until you do a destructive edit or rasterise it to the underlying document resolution. Hope this has helped not created more confusion. Best thing is to experiment with it your self to understand how it works unless a Serif team member wants to step in and elaborate further..

    Ok, thanks.  I’ll play with it.

  8. 5 minutes ago, Paul Mudditt said:

    In this example I have placed a high resolution jpeg onto a small 4”x5” document.

    As I zoom in you can see the pixelation as it is mapped onto the underlying document pixel dimensions.

    Watch as I enlarge way past the size of the document and where the photo was pixelated previously the image is again now clear.

    This shows that the embedded image is a vector layer scalable onto underlying document pixel dimensions whilst adjustments are made.

    As you stated, only on a destructive edit takes place do you lose that underlying high resolution photo.

    A

     

    7 minutes ago, Paul Mudditt said:

    In this example I have placed a high resolution jpeg onto a small 4”x5” document.

    As I zoom in you can see the pixelation as it is mapped onto the underlying document pixel dimensions.

    Watch as I enlarge way past the size of the document and where the photo was pixelated previously the image is again now clear.

    This shows that the embedded image is a vector layer scalable onto underlying document pixel dimensions whilst adjustments are made.

    As you stated, only on a destructive edit takes place do you lose that underlying high resolution photo.

    You seem to be saying that even though you are importing a JPEG raster file, AP creates a vector file from it.  And it remains a vector image until you perform a destructive edit.

  9. 8 hours ago, Paul Mudditt said:

    You can apply adjustments to an image layer and adjust its dimensions without losing its original resolution, only when you make destructive edits will it be rasterised to a pixel layer. Notice how the embedded photo remains a full resolution a image layer for adjustments but is automatically converted to a pixel layer when an operation requires it.

     

    I was thinking about this last night and would like to clear up something.  In your video you show how the image can be enlarged without losing clarity.  That is before a destructive edit.  But in my original example, the typical JPEG image is already rasterised when it is placed.  If you enlarge it enough, it will become pixelated.  This is before any edits.  Please explain.  Thanks.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.